Answer all of the areas from the document I added.


Topic is Health care career paper = MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNICIAN– Use correct spelling, grammar and syntax– Include six different sources of information (books, professional journals, articles, electronic sources, websites)it is important to add two book sources, two journals, two articles and the others from website

Discuss the range of ways in which women are represented in Armenian literature from the eighteenth to twentieth centuries. To what extent do you perceive a significant change in their social role and status during this period. Illustrate your argument by focusing on THREE of the works we have read.


The three works will be attached below.Raffi- The FoolArmeniaThe Bride

The purpose of this assignment is to present a comprehensive summary of the Event Planning Project.Using the content from the previous topic assignments, synthesize the event planning process in a 10-12 slide PowerPoint presentation. The group will present an overview of the Event Planning Project to their peers, including the challenges the group f and the overall experience of planning an event. Review the feedback you received on the previous assignments from your instructor and revise the project elements based on the feedback. Evidence of revision will be assessed on the final presentation. Comprehensive notes and citations are required in the Notes section of the PowerPoint presentation. The presentation should include the following sections:


Event Brief: Provide the event brief details and describe the role of specific challenges/concerns associated with planning the event.


Event Feasibility: Describe the findings of your research from the Event Feasibility document, including any action taken to mitigate risk during planning. Discuss the challenges and feasibility of the event.


Event Budget: Discuss the ability of the group to complete the comprehensive budget, including any changes to the budget that occurred over the course of the event planning.Describe whether your group was successful in staying within the designated budget.


Event Marketing Timeline: Discuss the accuracy of your event marketing timeline, and any changes to the timeline over the course of the event planning process. Discuss the summary rationale for how key marketing items of your event marketing timeline were organized.


Event Planning Problem – Pivoting: Present the event planning problem assigned to the group, and how you were able to overcome the event planning problem.


Sponsorship Deck: Provide the brief overview of your sponsorship packages. Using feedback from your instructor and peers, determine the successfulness of your sponsorship deck in acquiring potential sponsors.


Community Partnerships: Present the nonprofit organization that showed the most promise for community partnership. Include a general overview of how the group plans to market on behalf of this community partner, and the positive impact that will result on the overall mission of the nonprofit organization and the objectives of the event.


Social Media Campaign: Provide the brief overview of your social media event announcement. Using feedback from your instructor and peers, determine the successfulness of your social media campaign from the perspective of your followers.


Group Evaluation of Event Planning: Provide insight into your experience of planning this fictitious event as a group.


The event is for planning a high school basketball tournament in Arizona.

Assess the contribution of your intervention to patient or family satisfaction and quality of life.


Explain how your intervention enhances the patient, family, or group experience.


Describe your use of evidence and peer-reviewed literature to plan and implement your project.


Explain how the principles of evidence-based practice informed this aspect of your project.


Assess the degree to which you successfully leveraged health care technology in your capstone project to improve outcomes or communication with the patient, family, or group.


Identify opportunities to improve health care technology use in future practice.


Explain how health policy influenced the planning and implementation of your capstone project, as well as any contributions your project made to policy development.


Note specific observations related to the baccalaureate-prepared nurse’s role in policy implementation and development.


Explain whether your project outcomes matched your initial predictions.


Discuss the aspects of the project that met, exceeded, or fell short of your expectations.


Discuss whether your intervention can, or will be, adopted as a best practice.


Describe the generalizability of your intervention outside this particular setting. Assess your personal and professional growth throughout your capstone project and the RN-to-BSN program.


Address your provision of ethical care and demonstration of professional standards.


Identify specific growth areas of which you are most proud or in which you have taken particular satisfaction.


Competency 2: Make clinical and operational decisions based upon the best available evidence.


Describe ones use of evidence and peer-reviewed literature to plan and implement a capstone project.


Competency 3: Transform processes to improve quality, enhance patient safety, and reduce the cost of care.


Explain whether your project outcomes matched one’s initial predictions and document the practicum hours spent with these individuals or group 


Competency 4: Apply health information and patient care technology to improve patient and systems outcomes.


Assess the degree to which one successfully leveraged health care technology in a capstone project to improve outcomes or communication with a patient, family, or group.


Competency 5: Analyze the impact of health policy on quality and cost of care.


Explain how health policy influenced the planning and implementation of ones project, as well as any contributions the project made to policy development.


Competency 7: Implement patient-centered care to improve quality of care and the patient experience.


Assess the contribution of an intervention project to patient, family, or group satisfaction and quality of life.


Competency 8: Integrate professional standards and values into practice.


Assess ones personal and professional growth throughout a project and the RN-to-BSN program.

Instruction: Read the assigned articles. Submit a one page either in MS Word or pdf format.Please write clearly and be succinct.


I have the following research question:To what extent does COVID-19 in pregnancy alter the risks of adverse birth outcomes such as low birth weight, premature birth, and infant death compared with pregnant individuals without COVID-19?Do you recommend to use relative risk (RR) or odds ratio(OR)? Why? Explain.

Unit 2: Identifying and Assessing Marketing Opportunities


2.0 SITUATION ANALYSIS


Write a 1-paragraph summary of the current situation write this section after completing the following sections of the Situation Analysis, but put it in this order.


2.1 Market Summary


(Write this section after completing 2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.1.3, 2.1.4, and 2.2). In a 12 paragraph summary, address:


What are your target customer groups? Why?What are your projections for the growth of this market?2.1.1 Market Demographics (refer to Chapter 8 of your Kotler text for helpful definitions/explanations).


Carefully define the demographic profile of your target market.In a similar fashion, define the geographic target area you are choosing.What are the behavior factors that will influence your decision-making?Define the values and lifestyles (psychographics) of your target market.2.1.2 Market Needs


What are the benefits that are important to your customer base?What needs do they have and how do you know this?2.1.3 Market Trends


Identify and explain at least three trends that will influence how your customers view your product. These should be trends going on in the industry or the environment; these are trends that your company/product can respond to in some way. Remember: Trends are long term; fads are short term.2.1.4 Market Growth


Is the market growing, static, or diminishing? What are the growth trends?What is the evidence? What research are you using to determine market growth?How will you address the market if it is growing, static, or diminishing?2.2 SWOT Analysis (refer to Chapter 2 of your Kotler text for a thorough explanation of a SWOT analysis)


2.2.1 Strengths: List and describe at least three positive internal aspects that add value.


2.2.2 Weaknesses: List and describe at least three negative internal aspects that place you at competitive disadvantage.


2.2.3 Opportunities: List and describe at least three opportunities external to your business that will lead to your success.


2.2.4 Threats: List and describe at least three threats external to your business that will threaten your success (Note: It is common to include unexpected acts of nature, government and regulatory concerns, and competition in this section of the SWOT).


2.3 Competition


Describe your competition.Why will customers prefer your product?How will you compete with your competition and win?What is the marketing mix (price, place, promotion, product, you know them as the 4 Ps of Marketing) of at least one of your competitors?2.4 Product Offering


What are the product/features/benefits? (we particularly care about benefits as these are from the perspective of the target market)Describe your Brand Equity Model and say how you will build brand equity for this product/service.2.5 Keys to Success


List and describe at least three factors that will determine your success.2.6 Critical Issues


How will you leverage your SWOT strengths and opportunities to your advantage?How will you lessen the impact of your SWOT weaknesses and threats?Where is your product in the product life cycle and why? Refer to your Kotler text for a definition of a product life cycle.

INDIVIDUAL JOURNAL ARTICLE For the individual part of the Term Paper, you will need to find a source that has to be a scholarly article that addresses your groups topic. This article can be a report of an empirical study (quantitative or qualitative), a systematic review, or a meta-analysis.The following gives you some guidance on how to analyze the paper for the assignment. You do not have to follow this template slavishly and some points might not apply to the paper you chose for the assignment. The overall goal is that the reader of your summary gets a very good idea of the content of the paper. With regard to details, it is important to strike a balance between being too general and too specific. For instance, when you describe the methods in a study you should not mention minor details such as an incentive handed out to the participants.  Do not write the summary as an essay about the topic (e.g., there is no thesis you are defending) and do not write this up as a list (i.e., it needs to be a coherent text and cannot be point-form). You can use the following questions to structure your text. The content and structure of your summary depends on the kind of paper you are summarizing. Given that most of you will summarize an empirical paper that reports the results of a single study I will focus on this kind of source first. I will then add some information about meta-analyses and systematic reviews.I) Empirical paper:In a nutshell, your summary needs to cover the questions and rationale of the study (this includes the literature review), the theoretical and methodological approach taken (e.g., based on Banduras social learning theory; an experiment), the results, and how the authors interpret the results. These topics need to be covered. Here are some more specific questions:  1. What are the goals / research questions of this study? This information you can find in the Introduction of the paper. 2. Describe the rationale for the study (e.g., what is known from previous research, what is not known or controversial, what is the theory behind the study). This information you can find in the Introduction of the paper.3. If this is possible, identify the philosophical assumptions behind the research (what we discussed in class, such as mechanistic versus organismic). All sections of a paper are pertinent to this issue, particularly the Introduction, Methods, and Discussion sections. A specific theory (e.g., Banduras social learning theory) is not a philosophical assumption.4. What are the independent and dependent variables. This information you can find in the Introduction and also in Methods and Results). This might not apply, for instance for a qualitative study.5. What are the hypotheses? This might not apply, for instance for a qualitative study.6. What is the design of the study? Qualitative, quantitative, mixed methodCorrelational, experimentalLongitudinal, cross-sectionalThis information you can find in the Methods section of the paper.7. Describe the sample  Population (e.g., high school/undergraduate students, married couples, Martians, parents, divorced couples, victims of domestic violence).  Demographic characteristics (e.g., age, sex, race, educational level, income, length of relationship).   Size of the sample? This information you can find in the Methods section of the paper.8. Instruments and procedures of the study  Questionnaire, tests, experimental proceduresThis information you can find in the Methods section of the paper.9. List significant findings from the study.  This information you can find in the Results section of the paper. Do not get caught up in details; report the gist of the results.10. How did the authors interpret their findings?This information you can find in the Discussion section of the paper.9. Limitations of this study. Explain why these issues impact the findings. 10. Strengths of this study. Explain why these issues strengthen or give validity to the findings. 11. What are the implications of the study for professional practice? For the questions 9-11 you can summarize what the authors say about these issues and what you think about these issues.II) Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysesA systematic review is like a major literature review. It answers a defined research question by collecting and summarizing as comprehensively as possible empirical evidence that fits pre-specified eligibility criteria (e.g., design of the study). This means that a systematic review is not an empirical study; it is a comprehensive summary and evaluation of what we know from existing empirical studies. Systematic reviews are written in a narrative style (e.g., There is strong empirical support for the notion …).A meta-analysis is the use of statistical methods to combine and summarize the results of many empirical studies. Meta-analyses also summarize results in a narrative style, but they always include tables and stats. Often, papers include a meta-analysis and systematic review.If this is only a systematic review, then typically the sections of the paper look different from an empirical paper. Systematic reviews are usually organized around questions and topics (What do we know about the impact of A on B, of A on C, etc.)A number of the questions listed above also apply to a systematic review/meta-analysis. For instance:1. What are the goals / research questions of the review/m-a? This information you can find in the Introduction of the paper. 2. Describe the rationale for the review/m-a (e.g., there is a controversy about a treatment method). This information you can find in the Introduction of the paper.3. If this is possible, identify the philosophical assumptions behind the review/m-a (what we discussed in class, such as mechanistic versus organismic). This task is often more difficult when you deal with a review/m-a (the assumptions are often more hidden).4. How do the authors interpret the evidence (the difference here is that a review/m-a does not interpret the results from a single study; it is about the big picture)?But there are also differences. For instance, reviews/m-a usually do not have explicit hypotheses or one explicit theory. The Methods section is also different. The design question is rather simple: a systematic review has no design and a m-a is a m-a (you dont have to go into details here). One methodological question for reviews is how they found their information and what kind of evidence they included (this is not always evident and/or explicit). M-a are usually very explicit on this issue and you should mention this issue in your summary (but no details). Other issues are rather obvious: a review paper has no sample-size (but a m-a tells you have many studies were included and what the combined number of participants was). The best way to summarize a review/m-a is the following:1) What is the question, rationale, etc.2) MethodsFor instance:

Essays are expected to show your familiarity with the issues dealt with in the sessions devoted to India, in terms of history and cultural idiosyncrasies ( especially religious diversity and conflict, colonialism and caste), and also with the narrative and analytical materials included (especially Mr and Mrs Iyer, but also Earth, the film on Dr. Ambedkars life, the Introduction to Annihilation of Caste, and the Dalit poems).– Do not forget to choose a strong and clear thesis statement for your essay, that you will defend and illustrate throughout.– In each essay there should be some reference to at least two from the following texts or visual narratives: Mr and Mrs Iyer, Earth, Introduction to Annihilation of Caste, Dalit poems.– Use of further or secondary sources will be welcome, although it is not compulsory. In this case, please, make sure to provide the appropriate references, preferably in APA format (you can also choose another format, but be consistent anyway).– Class materials and other sources are allowed for consultation during essay writing. URKUND will be enabled in the task, and plagiarism will be severely penalized.– I shall be in the BBColl room to answer your questions in the chatbox on Tuesday 25 between 7 and 8.30 pm. Later than that, write any possible questions via e -mail.– The Word file should be uploaded on the Moodle any time before May 26 May, 7 pm.– Please, name your document: Surname, Name, HICPOCO20-21EssayII.


 – ACKNOWLEDGE YOUR SOURCES AND LIST THEM APPROPRIATELY AS WORKS CITED.– Essay format: Word file; up to 2 sides; 12 pt. Times New Roman; 1.5-sp.

Project 1 is your first step toward Project 3: Article. Its an important step, too, because without strong and fitting ideas, you will not be successful in your next two writing projects. Because all three of the major writing projects are scaffolded, you must understand how Project 1 leads to Project 2 which leads to Project 3a lineage that was covered in the Unit 1: Orientation folder in Bb. After you understand the links between projects, Project 1 becomes relatively simple. You will create a business-style memo (much like the document youre reading right now!) in which you detail your top two ideas for Project 3. Only one of your two ideas will move forward in the writing process and eventually become the basis for the research you conduct for P2 and the writing you do for P3. Your memo must be 1,000 to 1,500 words, which includes only the body of the memo and not the heading. To help you develop a thorough memo, please address the following prompts: Introduction: What is your understanding of Project 3? What is a trend analysis and how does this differ from, say, a formal argument or a cause and effect essay? Then, spoil the surprise by telling us up front which of the two ideas youre leaning toward. Body: From the work youve done so far, select your top two most fitting ideas and, per idea, address each of these prompts: How did you land on this idea? Use the Radical Thinking worksheet, all the brainstorming youve done, and your peers feedback on the discussion board to answer this question. Everyones research question will be the same: How has X changed over time? With that overarching question in mind, think about sub-questions that will help you answer our shared question. List 3-5 open-ended research questions you could ask about the sub-topics of your idea that will help you answer the overarching research question. So what and who cares? In other words, how might this idea apply to others or speak to a more universal issue, trend, etc.? What is the moment of exigence for this idea (a major event or starting point for this trend) and why did you choose it? Conclusion: Briefly reiterate your preferred idea. This memo will help solidify your plans for moving forward. And if your idea works in fulfillment of the Project 3: Article, then you will continue on to Project 2 and begin the research portion of the writing process. This incorporates the last project you completed for me so it made sense for me to request you for it.

2.    In The House of God, with time, Roy began to dehumanize his patients (following in the footsteps of Pinkus and some others).  In fact, some physicians believe it is necessary to remain emotionally unattached to their patients for professional impartiality, self-care, and other reasons.  Others argue that patients have to be viewed as unique, individual, and, importantly, whole human beings who are owed all of a physicians attention, care, and perhaps even empathy and love.  Do you think that Shem (the author) takes a position on this debate in the book, and if so, what is he trying to say?  Whatever your argument might be about Shems intent and/or message, do you think that he is right?  Why or why not?