HCM 700 Milestone Two Guidelines and Rubric

HCM 700 Milestone Two Guidelines and Rubric

Steered

For Milestone Two, you are going to submit a draft of your proposed needs evaluate. It’s good to encompass a press unlock of need that lets within the reader to learn more about your preferred assert,

items proof that supports the necessity to your program, and demonstrates that your organization understands the need and could address the assert. If the assert entails a explicit affected

inhabitants(s), corresponding to staff or sufferers, make positive to determine that inhabitants’s explicit needs. The usage of what you realized about administration theories in Module Two, focus on explicit

administration theories that guided your identification of the assert.

Namely, the next critical plot must be addressed:

II. Proposal Wants Evaluate

Invent a press unlock of need that lets within the reader to learn more about your preferred assert, items proof that supports the necessity to your proposal, and demonstrates that your

organization understands the need and could address the assert. If the assert entails a explicit affected inhabitants(s), corresponding to staff or sufferers, make positive to determine that inhabitants’s

explicit needs. Discuss over with the Module Two resources to focus on about explicit administration theories that will most doubtless be critical for solving the assert.

What to Post

The draft of your Wants Evaluate must be submitted as a 2- to a couple-online page Microsoft Phrase doc with double spacing, 12-point Instances Original Roman font, and one-skedaddle margins, and any

references cited in APA structure. Train relevant headings to determine every critical part.

Milestone Two Rubric

Standards Exemplary (100%) Proficient (90%) Wants Enchancment (70%) No longer Evident (0%) Designate

Proposal Wants Evaluate:

Assertion of Want

Meets “Proficient” standards and

affords a press unlock of need

with a high level of part

Identifies the need or assert to

be explored

Identifies the need or assert to

be explored but does now not

encompass ample part

Doesn’t encompass a press unlock

of need

30

Proposal Wants Evaluate:

Proof

Meets “Proficient” standards and

demonstrates an insightful

idea of the proof

Provides proof that

supports the need for the

program and demonstrates an

idea of the need

Provides proof that

supports the need for the

program but does now not

brand an idea

of the need

Doesn’t most up-to-date proof that

supports the need for the

program

30



4/8/25, 12:fifty three PM Project Data

https://learn.snhu.edu/d2l/le/voice material/1894082/viewContent/40165657/Look 1/2

Standards Exemplary (100%) Proficient (90%) Wants Enchancment (70%) No longer Evident (0%) Designate

Proposal Wants Evaluate:

Administration Theories

Meets “Proficient” standards and

supports the evaluate with

relevant administration

theories

Discusses explicit administration

theories and the very best plan they apply to

the complications

Discusses explicit administration

theories but now not how they

apply to the complications

Doesn’t focus on explicit

administration theories

30

Articulation of Response Submission is freed from errors

linked to citations, grammar,

spelling, syntax, and

organization and is introduced

in a talented and uncomplicated-to-

read structure

Submission has no main errors

linked to citations, grammar,

spelling, syntax, or organization

Submission has main errors

linked to citations, grammar,

spelling, syntax, or organization

that negatively affect

readability and articulation of

main ideas

Submission has critical errors

linked to citations, grammar,

spelling, syntax, or organization

that prevent idea of

ideas

10

Whole: 100%

4/8/25, 12:fifty three PM Project Data

https://learn.snhu.edu/d2l/le/voice material/1894082/viewContent/40165657/Look 2/2