ASSESSMENT DETAILS Course Lead: Mr. Vincent Lim Alice Lee Centre for Nursing Reviews Yong Relaxation room Lin School of Treatment, Nationwide University of Singapore Overview of Review Item No. Description Weightage Review/Due Date Instructions 1 Class active participation 10% N/A N/A 2 Crew Presentation (20 minutes) 30% (25% group work + 5% particular person provide) All groups submit PPT slides by Sunday Fifth Oct 2359hrs Presentations: Week 8 ->uncommon groups Week 9->even groups Soft reproduction (PPT file) – upload final slides to Canvas in week 7 by Sunday Fifth Oct 2359hrs 3 Particular person Written Project (1,800 words ±10%) 60% Week 12 6th November 2359 hrs Upload softcopy of project with the fleshy Turnitin similarity index REPORT to Examsoft by 6th Nov 2359 hrs for marking. Write My Project Hire a Expert Essay & Project Writer for finishing your Tutorial Assessments Native Singapore Writers Group 100% Plagiarism-Free Essay Highest Pride Rate Free Revision On-Time Supply Review Suggestions and Criteria Component 1: Class active participation (10%) Students might be assessed according to their participation in tutorial actions from week 0 to week 12. The actions comprise taking share in group discussions and presenting findings to the class. Component 2: Crew Mission/Presentation Suggestions- Crew Review (30%) (25% Crew work + 5% particular person provide) DUE Sunday 5 Oct 2359 hrs submit thru CANVAS a. Students will invent diminutive groups (4-6 students per group, resolve 1 group leader) and make community evaluation and profiling. b. Length: 15 minutes presentation with 5 minutes for questions and discussion following the presentation. Total time (most) 20 minutes per group c. You might maybe pick a geographic community of curiosity to your group – A community can excellent be assessed by one group of students. As soon as your group has made up our minds, comprise a group leader tell the tutor thru e mail. d. Read and note steps in book pg. 102-111 to conduct community health evaluation and reward the followings: Introduction – Picture your community’s profile/history and traits with supported proof such as news, articles, social media, graphs, etc. – Recount causes of deciding on the community your group chose. Crew Review – Seriously analyse the observations, windshield seek for or foot surveys, and interview findings to call the health points and the wants of the community i.e., social demographics, health inequalities, psychosocial points, determinants of health, financial, sources, etc. – Focus on the challenges your group faced all thru the community evaluation route of o Identification of Health Components – In step with your diagnosis, name now not lower than 3 community health points/risks i.e., power illness, physical or mental cases and give an explanation for the ONE most important utter with proof from literature to reinforce diagnosis e. PowerPoint is the format for presentation (# of slides doesn’t topic). f. Presentation might be delivered face to face. Every student in the group must take part in the presentation. g. Marks (5%) might be allocated for particular person provide and presentation expertise. h. Discussion wants to be generated following every presentation. Crew engagement (Kahoot, seek for, etc) is anticipated with preparation of questions and feedback. i. Students who are absent for the presentation without approval from the Course Lead or tedious submission (submitted after October Fifth 2359) might be subjected to PENALTY MARKS for the evaluation. Marking Criteria for Class Active Participation (CAP) Pupil name / Matriculation quantity: Class Weightage Exemplary 8-10 Prison 5-7 Emerging 3-4 Formative 0-2 Rep Perspective (20%) Continually respectful to self, peers and tutors and has a certain attitude. Continuously provides constructive ideas on the work and ideas of others. On the final respectful to self, peers and tutors. On the final has a certain attitude. On a regular basis provides constructive ideas on the work of others. Now and again behaves in a respectful manner and has a certain attitude. Now and again provides constructive ideas on the work of others. Rarely ever behaves in a respectful manner. Rarely ever or does now not provide constructive ideas on the work of others. Focal point (20%) Continuously specializes in the topic of debate. Very self-directed. On the final specializes in the topic of debate. Self-directed. Now and again ready to retain point of curiosity on what wants to be performed. Might maybe want an occasional reminder. Rarely ever ready to retain point of curiosity on what wants to be performed. Must be reminded. Contribution (20%) Continuously provides precious tips in class participation. Makes effort to be willing for discussions. On the final provides precious tips in class participation. Makes effort to be willing for discussions. Now and again provides precious tips in class participation. Makes effort for what’s required. Rarely ever provides precious tips in class participation. Seldom makes effort to take part in discussions. Group player (20%) Continually listens to others, shares and helps the efforts of the crew. On the final listens to others, shares and helps the efforts of the crew. Now and again listens to others and shares and helps the efforts of the crew. Rarely ever listens to others and shares and helps the efforts of the crew. Disrupts or discourages crew’s attempts to participate. Conduct (20%) Alert and engages in all discussions with out a demonstration of disruptive behaviour. Alert and engages in most discussions with out a demonstration of disruptive behaviour. Alert and engages in some discussions with out a demonstration of disruptive behaviour. Alert and engages in few discussions. Now and again demonstrates some disruptive behaviour. Total /100 Marking Criteria for Crew Presentation Course: NUR3117A Public and Crew Health Class Exemplary Prison Emerging Formative Rep Weightage (58%) Shriek ( 8 to 10 ) Demonstrates fleshy mutter material info with appropriate explanations and elaboration. Offers definite neutral discussion with examples, discussion with strengthen examples, facts, and/or seriously strengthen conclusions tips with proof. ( 5 to 7 ) Demonstrates ease with the mutter material info with explanations and elaboration. Offers seriously definite neutral and discussion with some examples, facts, and/or seriously strengthen conclusions tips with proof. ( 3 to 4 ) Demonstrates rudimentary mutter material info with cramped explanations and elaboration. Offers susceptible neutral and discussion with examples, facts, and/or strengthen conclusions tips with insufficient proof. ( 0 to 2 ) Demonstrates no mutter material info with explanations and elaboration. Offers no and pertinent neutral and discussion with out a facts, and/or strengthen conclusions tips with out a proof. Organization (15%) ( 8 to 10 ) Right and absorbing introduction; Overall Introduction; Overall organized; conclusion presentation is reinforces main point. presentation is reinforces main point. presentation is unclear and now not linked. Discontinue the presentation all thru the allocated time. ( 5 to 7 ) Determined Introduction; Overall presentation natty; conclusion all thru the allocated time. ( 3 to 4 ) A little bit definite Introduction; Overall presentation appropriate organized; conclusion. Discontinue the presentation inside 30 sec +/- of allocated time. ( 0 to 2 ) No definite Introduction; Overall presentation now not smartly linked; cramped conclusion. Discontinue the presentation inside 1 min +/- of allocated time. Discontinue the presentation inside 2 min +/- of allocated time. Particular person Supply (17%) ( 8 to 10 ) Improbable presentation. Captured the viewers with query contact and definite train; smartly willing. ( 5 to 7 ) Prison presentation, appropriate query contact, appropriate train; willing. ( 3 to 4 ) Choppy presentation, little query contact, exhausting to hear and note; seriously willing. ( 0 to 2 ) Bad presentation, no query contact, very sophisticated to hear and note; unprepared. Collaboration (10%) ( 8 to 10 ) Improbable crew work. Every group member contributes equally and sufficiently. ( 5 to 7 ) Prison crew work. Every group member contributes seriously equally and sufficiently. ( 3 to 4 ) Cheap crew work. Every group member makes some contributions. ( 0 to 2 ) No crew work. Crew participants conclude now not make contributions equally and sufficiently. Total: Aquire Personalized Reply of This Review & Elevate Your Grades Web A Free Quote Component 3: Particular person Writing Project – Crew Nursing Notion of Care Administration (60%) DUE on the 6th November 2025, 2359 hrs thru EXAMSOFT TURNITIN and Examsoft might be made readily accessible on the 6th October 2025 for submission This particular person written project targets to consolidate the student’s studying by linking principle to clinical note in the community. The community evaluation expertise provides students with accurate lifestyles physical and cognitive experiences, assesses community wants and identifies key health points. The usage of the findings out of your group’s community evaluation performed, obtain methods, integrating a health promotion mannequin/ principle, to handle health/psychosocial points from a case query in underneath. Explain your group’s chosen community’s sources and settings to acquire particular person/family nursing care conception to the points. Like a case query with your group’s identified health utter (now not lower than 1 health utter) and address the questions underneath: a. Name and severely analyse now not lower than 3 key health or psychosocial behaviour/points affecting the client and/caregiver. Present proof from literature to reinforce diagnosis. b. Like a condominium care self-administration conception for 3 points that had been talked about in above by making expend of a health promotion mannequin (e.g. HBM, TTM, or CCM). The conception might well mild comprise teach targets/measurable outcomes and interventions to empower the client/caregivers to self-put collectively in the dwelling/community. Present evidences to reinforce your proposed interventions. In case your case-query has a affected person being discharged from the hospital to home, you might well also moreover discuss the expected wants in the dwelling that the affected person has such as, gear, products and services, and referrals. c. Within the conception, note how reward community sources might well even be constructed-in into the administration of care to bid effective person-centered care in the community. The community location your group chose for the community evaluation venture might be regarded as as the community for the case-query. d. Focus on evaluation approach for assessing the measurable outcomes. Frequently Requested Questions: A case query might well even be developed from a resident your group encountered all thru the community evaluation venture otherwise you might well also expend your any family member/relative/friends/outdated clinical attachment affected person (without names) with power ailments might be acceptable (please opinion an example in underneath). Contain caregivers and psychosocial points. Easiest assignments submitted in EXAMSOFT might be marked. Must you submit the final file into Canvas, this is able to maybe now not be marked and tedious submission protection might be affected. Please read the steps required to submit your final file: 1. Generate Turnitin document thru Canvas and 2. Put up your final file thru Examsoft. Must you will settle on to make expend of one other conduct principle moreover HBM, TTM, or CCM, please write an e mail to your tutor with rationale and make sure with the tutor first. 3 key health or psychosocial conduct points must encompass each client and caregiver. Components can’t be all about caregiver. 150-200 of words, must encompass power ailments, demographics, social/scientific history, family strengthen, health conduct points. CASE- Scenario Instance: Mr Tan is a married 70-year-feeble, retired Chinese gentleman and lives in a 2-room Flexi Flat alongside with his important other historical 68 years feeble in Queenstown. They conclude now not comprise any younger other people. Mr Tan has frequent admissions to the hospital as a consequence of a whole lot of episodes of breathlessness. He is a power smoker (started in the final 40 years) and he has scientific history of hypertension diabetes and hyperlipidemia. In his recent hospital admission, Mr Tan changed into as soon as referred to the Respiratory Treatment department as he skilled persistent shortness of breath despite of inpatient therapy. Mr Tan’s spirometry check advised of average to excessive obstruction of airways. His main diagnosis for admission concluded as Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Stage 2. He changed into as soon as discharged with Salbutamol (Metered Dose Inhaler with Spacer). Sooner than discharge, he got affected person education on the expend and effects of the inhalers, reinforcements of early symptom recognition and administration and advice on smoking halt. Criteria: Context and Reason (10%) – Name key health and psychosocial points affecting the client and/ caregiver. Shriek (30%) – Picture the facts of the methods and targets, allowing for on the native healthcare machine and sources readily accessible. – Incorporate appropriate health promotion mannequin/principle. – Recount the measurable outcomes and provide evaluation approach. Diagnosis (30%) – Seriously analyze the principle health and psychosocial points affecting the client and/caregiver. – Focus on and imply interventions for monitoring and empowering the client/caregivers to self-put collectively for a sustainable home care administration using the excellent principle/mannequin – Explore how reward community sources out of your community evaluation might well even be constructed-in into the administration of care to bid effective person-centered care in the community. – Focus on life like evaluation approach for every measurable outcomes. Quality of Evidence (10%) – Toughen with high quality scholarly evidences. – Contain an intensive literature evaluation and proof primarily based entirely entirely note articles (now not lower than 12). Clarity (10%) – Elaborate the major tips and be consistent with the wander of information. Yell of Reference (10%) – Adherence to APA seventh version format. The word restrict for this project is 1,800 words (+/- 10%) except for duvet/title web mutter, contents web mutter, tables, figures, graphs, conclude-reference checklist and appendices. High of the variety scholarly evidences are regarded as as to find-reviewed articles/books. In-textual mutter material quotation and reference checklist might well mild note the seventh version of the Newsletter Manual of the American Psychological Association (APA) vogue. The marking requirements is linked in Appendix B in the evaluation diminutive print. Contents in tables might maybe now not be marked. Tutorial Format Project wants to be of 1.5 spacing and expend a 12-point the reader-pleasant font (eg: Calibri, Times Unusual Roman, Arial). The margins wants to be now not lower than 2.5cm. A title web mutter might well mild encompass the student quantity, route name, route code, route lead, evaluation title, & due date The usage of APA Format Text citations and reference lists might well mild note primarily the most up-to-date American Psychological Association (APA) format. Extra info is straight away accessible on the NUS library webpage at https://libguides.nus.edu.sg/APA/references Plagiarism All students portion the responsibility for upholding the educational requirements and recognition of the University. Tutorial honesty is a prerequisite situation in the pursuit and acquisition of information. Tutorial dishonesty is any misrepresentation with the intent to deceive or failure to acknowledge the source or falsification of information or inaccuracy of statements or dishonest at examinations/tests or noxious expend of sources. There are many kinds of tutorial dishonesty and plagiarism is conception of as one of them. Plagiarism is usually outlined as ‘the note of taking but one more person’s work or tips and passing them off as one’s have’ (The Unusual Oxford Dictionary of English). The University does now not condone plagiarism. Plagiarism is a excessive offence and is in breach of the Copyright Act. The University makes an intensive effort to coach students relating to the importance of tutorial integrity. Please talk over with http://www.usp.nus.edu.sg/curriculum/plagiarism/ for the University’s build on plagiarism. You’d also talk over with the websites of the Centre for Pattern of Instructing and Studying (CDTL) at https://www.nus.edu.sg/cdtl and NUS libraries at https://libguides.nus.edu.sg/new2nus/acadintegrity for added info. Students are to submit the mushy reproduction of the written project (without duvet web mutter, conclude reference, and declaration invent) in the ‘Review’ Folder in Studying Administration Gadget for the Turnitin Document (the similarity index wants to be lower than 20%). If the similarity index is bigger than 20%, the project will might well mild be revised sooner than resubmission. Students submitting written assignments in any invent are required to glue to their project a reproduction of the TURNITIN fleshy document and a signed reproduction of the plagiarism declaration (without the student’s name) indicating the student’s pledge that every person work in the project is their very have; and that they’ve acknowledged all sources of information aged to acquire the project. Students are required to retain a mushy and exhausting reproduction of their project submitted for grading. Even though due care might be fascinated about all submitted assignments, the ALCNS college participants are now not to blame if the student is unable to create a reproduction of any submitted project, might well mild the student’s project be inadvertently misplaced or destroyed. Late Submission All assignments wants to be submitted by 2359 hours of the due date. All extension requests wants to be talked about with the route lead outdated to the due date of the project. The penalty will procedure terminate enact if the project is submitted after 2359 hours of the due date. Students are required to submit all parts of the route evaluation, no topic whether or now not a piece of evaluation is tedious, to be eligible for a final grade for the route.” **Last-minute excuses such as laptop crashes, unfamiliarity with utility and/or file corruption might maybe now not be current. The manner to submit the actual person written project (2 steps): Students must upload the actual person project (without the title web mutter and conclude references) online thru Canvas to generate a Turnitin document (1st step) Then, submit the fleshy Turnitin document (now not honest one web mutter), 2. No Plagiarism Declaration Type (reward in Canvas), and 3. particular person project (at the side of title web mutter and conclude references) (Microsoft place of work word format or PDF) to Examsoft sooner than the closing date for marking (2nd step). The written project wants to be submitted to Examsoft to be marked. (if the file size is too huge, you’ve gotten to compress the file, expend this Adobe link to be taught to compress/decrease your file size) https://www.adobe.com/sg/acrobat/online/compress pdf.html?promoid=C12Y2YQN&mv=completely different Referencing Desire of references. You are expected to make expend of a range of appropriate quality publication in supporting your discussion. An approximate guide for the sequence of referencing required might be ONE reference for every 150-200 words in word restrict (minimum 12 references) Referencing vogue: APA. An conclude-reference checklist wants to be offered, precisely formatted as per the APA seventh pointers. All tips and arguments derived from the literature MUST be referenced all thru the physique of your essay as you cite or paraphrase them. It is miles NOT acceptable to provide in-textual mutter material quotation excellent on the completion of every paragraph. In-textual mutter material citations might well mild seem in opposition to the teach sentence to which they note. Marking Criteria: Particular person Written Project – 60 % Course: NUR3117A Public and Crew Health Name/Pupil ID: Weightage Exemplary (8 to 10) Prison (5 to 7) Emerging (3 to 4) Formative (0 to 2) Context and Reason (10%) Demonstrates a thorough figuring out of context and neutral that is central to the assigned job(s). Demonstrates a appropriate figuring out of context and neutral that is central to the assigned job(s). Demonstrates a median figuring out of context and neutral that is central to the assigned job(s). Demonstrates minimal or no figuring out to the context and neutral that is central to the assigned job(s). Shriek (30%) Demonstrates in-depth mutter material info with appropriate explanations and elaboration. Demonstrates appropriate mutter material info with ample explanations and elaboration. Demonstrates average mutter material info with minimal explanations and elaboration. Demonstrates unhappy mutter material info and unable to reply to to the project requirements. Diagnosis (30%) Synthesizes proof to inform insightful patterns, similarities or variations connected to the duty. Suggestions are smartly supported with proof. Organizes proof to inform important patterns, similarities or variations connected to the duty. Suggestions are reasonably supported with proof. Organizes proof to inform superficial patterns, similarities or variations connected to the duty. Suggestions are minimally supported with proof. Uses noxious proof which comprise little and now not relevant to the assigned job. Quality of Evidence (10%) Uses most up-to-date compelling proof from primarily to find-reviewed expert journals or completely different current sources which might well be most relevant to the assigned job. Uses appropriate proof from primarily to find-reviewed expert journals or completely different current sources which might well be reasonably relevant to the assigned job. Uses superficial proof from primarily to find-reviewed expert journals or completely different current sources which might well be minimally relevant to the assigned job. Uses noxious proof which comprise little and now not relevant to the assigned job. Class Weightage Exemplary Prison Emerging Formative Rep Clarity (10%)Yell of Reference (10%) (8 to 10) Uses language that enables the wander of tips smoothly from one to at least one other regularly and sustains reader’s curiosity all thru. (5 to 7) Uses language that in most cases enables the wander of tips from one to at least one other and retains the reader’s consideration as a rule. (3 to 4) Uses language that enables occasional wander of tips and is sophisticated to retain reader’s curiosity. (0 to 2) Uses language that impedes figuring out and loses reader’s curiosity. (8 to 10) APA format is aged precisely in quotation and reference. (5 to 7) APA format is aged with minor errors in quotation and reference. (3 to 4) APA format is aged with main errors in quotation and reference. (0 to 2) Format of the project is now not recognizable as APA. Total: Assessor’s Name & Signature: Date: Checker’s Name & Signature: Date: Caught with masses of homework assignments and feeling stressed out ? Steal expert tutorial assistance & Web 100% Plagiarism free papers Web A Free Quote
- WE OFFER THE BEST CUSTOM PAPER WRITING SERVICES. WE HAVE DONE THIS QUESTION BEFORE, WE CAN ALSO DO IT FOR YOU.
- Assignment status: Already Solved By Our Experts
- (USA, AUS, UK & CA PhD. Writers)
- CLICK HERE TO GET A PROFESSIONAL WRITER TO WORK ON THIS PAPER AND OTHER SIMILAR PAPERS, GET A NON PLAGIARIZED PAPER FROM OUR EXPERTS
QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPER – NO ChatGPT.NO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER
Looking for unparalleled custom paper writing services? Our team of experienced professionals at AcademicWritersBay.com is here to provide you with top-notch assistance that caters to your unique needs.
We understand the importance of producing original, high-quality papers that reflect your personal voice and meet the rigorous standards of academia. That’s why we assure you that our work is completely plagiarism-free—we craft bespoke solutions tailored exclusively for you.
Why Choose AcademicWritersBay.com?
- Our papers are 100% original, custom-written from scratch.
- We’re here to support you around the clock, any day of the year.
- You’ll find our prices competitive and reasonable.
- We handle papers across all subjects, regardless of urgency or difficulty.
- Need a paper urgently? We can deliver within 6 hours!
- Relax with our on-time delivery commitment.
- We offer money-back and privacy guarantees to ensure your satisfaction and confidentiality.
- Benefit from unlimited amendments upon request to get the paper you envisioned.
- We pledge our dedication to meeting your expectations and achieving the grade you deserve.
Our Process: Getting started with us is as simple as can be. Here’s how to do it:
- Click on the “Place Your Order” tab at the top or the “Order Now” button at the bottom. You’ll be directed to our order form.
- Provide the specifics of your paper in the “PAPER DETAILS” section.
- Select your academic level, the deadline, and the required number of pages.
- Click on “CREATE ACCOUNT & SIGN IN” to provide your registration details, then “PROCEED TO CHECKOUT.”
- Follow the simple payment instructions and soon, our writers will be hard at work on your paper.
AcademicWritersBay.com is dedicated to expediting the writing process without compromising on quality. Our roster of writers boasts individuals with advanced degrees—Masters and PhDs—in a myriad of disciplines, ensuring that no matter the complexity or field of your assignment, we have the expertise to tackle it with finesse. Our quick turnover doesn’t mean rushed work; it means efficiency and priority handling, ensuring your deadlines are met with the excellence your academics demand.
