Review Brief Programme: Core module working all over assorted undergraduate programmes Module Code: SM9689 Module Title: To blame Strategy Dispensed on: September 2025 Submission Time and Date: Phase 1 – Individual task to be submitted electronically by the time and date indicated on the module elp (blackboard) Phase 2 – Group Presentation to be submitted electronically by the time and date indicated on the module elp (blackboard) Observe Restrict: for Phase 1 Individual task: 2000 words (+/- 10%) for Phase 2 Group Presentation: 10-minute (+/- 10%) recorded presentation Weighting The section 1 coursework accounts for [75]% of the entire sign for this module The Phase 2 of the task (Group Presentation) accounts for [25%] of the entire sign for this module. Submission of Review Digital Administration of Review (EMA): Please masks that your task is submitted electronically and also can peaceable be submitted online by approach of Turnitin by the given closing date. It is doubtless you’ll possibly well acquire a Turnitin link on the module’s eLP blueprint. It is your accountability to earn sure that your task arrives sooner than the submission closing date stated on the eLP. Watch the College coverage on slow submission of labor. Write My Assignment Struggling With Your SM9689 To blame Strategy Individual Assignment? Native Singapore Writers Crew 100% Plagiarism-Free Essay Absolute top Satisfaction Charge Free Revision On-Time Shipping Directions on Review: For Phase 1 Individual task you are required to earn a 2000-notice (+/-10%) document based mostly totally totally on the next duties: Opt out a firm from the list of firms supplied on the module eLP. Defend in thoughts the strategic development of your chosen organisation through the company social accountability and sustainability lens the utilization of quite so much of factual frameworks supplied and discussed all the arrangement in which through the course of the module. This also can embody theories, models and frameworks from the realm of strategic administration, industry ethics and to blame organisational contexts. Your task must observe the next development: An introduction. This half introduces the vow material of the task and the firm. It in immediate outlines the organisation’s strategic space inner their industry. We imply that you attain now not narrate larger than 100 words for this half. [5%] A 3-horizons evaluation The narrate of a three-horizons framework discuss the firm’s soundless, emerging and prospective activities shaping the sort forward for the organisation and its doubtless development. Drawing upon the price chain and resource-based mostly totally mostly gape discuss the firm’s sources of competitive advantage. Which of the firm’s competencies and/or dynamic capabilities attain contribute essentially the most to its to blame and sustainable development and future? Use quite so much of scholarly sources, debates and frameworks to habits a important evaluation. (aprox 800 words) [40%] Stakeholder Review Defend in thoughts the accurate approach to blame the strategic course of the organisation has been from the level of gape of its key stakeholders. Focus on how the organisation tackled assorted company social irresponsibility (CSIR) acts it committed over the previous 10 years and which stakeholder groups were affected essentially the most by the firm’s misconduct/s. Focus on whether or now not the organisation has performed ample to rectify the damages precipitated to its key stakeholders and whether or now not and the arrangement in which the firm invested into constructing and strengthening these relationships for future success. For this section of the evaluation, you are welcome to make narrate of factual CSR and CSI frameworks supplied and discussed all the arrangement in which through the course of the module (approx. 800 words) [40%] Drawing upon the total evaluation, propose a factual strategic course for the firm to earn it more to blame, sustainable and ethical both transient and long-length of time. The ideas proposed for the firm’s strategic development also can peaceable be assessed in opposition to SAF (Suitability, Acceptability, and Feasibility) criteria and grounded in functional concerns (aprox 300 words) [15%] Review Guidance Rotund Review Guidance shall be given in Assignment Lecture (please make certain that you review this enviornment topic). You furthermore would possibly possibly can very well be allowed to resolve a firm of your want to your task but will additionally be supplied with an legit list of firms on the module eLP. It is doubtless you’ll possibly well habits a written strategic evaluation (development outlined above) that informs the reader referring to the strategic development of the organisation through the utilization of quite so much of company social accountability and sustainability frameworks and what the firm does or can attain to expand and offers a boost to its social accountability to its key stakeholder groups for a more sustained competitive advantage. Most of your evaluation shall be based mostly totally totally on the notion and frameworks taught as section of this module and the knowledgeable opinions from authoritative sources (all referenced and cited within the APA type) that you are going to narrate to reduction your strategic evaluation. Your strategic ideas will occupy assorted suggestions on more to blame and sustainable future for the industry and their key stakeholders. You furthermore would possibly possibly can very well be strongly knowledgeable now to now not make narrate of Synthetic Intelligence (AI) to jot down your task as this also can end result in Tutorial Misconduct (AM). Narrate: Turnitin will present the module tutor with an Synthetic Intelligence (AI) Get hold of figuring out any text that can possibly well admire been generated by AI. This contains vow material know-how by ChatGPT and/or other AI platforms. We strongly imply that you attain NOT narrate these and other similar instruments which can lead to Tutorial Misconduct. At the same time as grammar-checking by Grammarly and proofreading companies are allowed they’ll also peaceable be dilapidated only inner cheap limits. Northumbria College Tutorial Misconduct coverage states: p.1.8 “Proof-reading entails the identification of grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors in text. The narrate of proof-reading or translation companies also can affirm tutorial misconduct if the service contains any editorial activity which entails re-writing or re-wording the student’s usual work beyond this”. 3.6 extra clarifies “Ghosting collectively with Contract Dishonest and narrate of Synthetic Intelligence (AI) Programs Ghosting exists the put: 3.6.1 A student submits as their bear, work which has been produced in entire or section by but any other person or AI plot on their behalf, e.g. the utilization of a ‘ghost writing’ service, AI plot or similar. Here is additionally veritably steadily known as ‘contract dishonest’ and covers the purchase of companies from on-line essay writing websites and the utilization of AI programs to generate essays”. Structure for Submission The Phase 1 of the evaluation – Individual Assignment – also can peaceable be written: in Arial, 11pt, left-justified, 1½ spacing as a Microsoft Observe doc only DO NOT put up your task as a PDF doc DO NOT put Your Name (or any Tutor’s Name) wherever to your task. Every page also can peaceable be numbered (in header or footer) and vow your student ID. Each half also can peaceable originate up on a brand contemporary page. DO NOT narrate appendices. Tables, figures and frameworks dilapidated for illustration and explanation also can peaceable be placed on the same page or conclude to the put it became referred to in text. All tutorial and other sources want to be cited APA format and integrated ONCE in a single reference list on the tip of the doc. Enact now not cite Northumbria Lectures, Seminars or Workshops. Reducing and pasting enviornment topic straight from sources without citation is Plagiarism. Reducing and pasting enviornment topic straight from sources with citation is Wretched Scholarship. Rapid quoted extracts from cited sources are permissible – narrate double quotation marks”” and citation that suggestions the page want of the cited doc. The overwhelming majority of your task notice count also can peaceable narrate your bear words or paraphrase respected sources. For Phase 2 of the task, which is a Group Presentation, you are required to prepare a neighborhood presentation. In a neighborhood of (3-5 folk) you are required to prepare a 10-minute recorded presentation. As administration consultants that it is doubtless you’ll also admire been employed by a firm that has been struggling to combine CSR into its industry capabilities and operations. It is doubtless you’ll possibly well be required to habits research into your chosen organisation and prepare a opinion of how the organisation would possibly possibly possibly make and mix or give a boost to its CSR in a single amongst its industry capabilities. Suggestions supplied would abet the organisation to change into a more socially to blame and sustainable industry. Please masks: Your neighborhood must select an organisation by yourselves for the task. You furthermore would possibly possibly can very well be now not allowed to make narrate of any of the firms supplied for the Phase A of the task. Your team of workers will earn a 10-minute recorded presentation (i.e. a powerpoint with a recorded voiceover submitted as a recorded video file) and also can peaceable embody: An introduction to the team of workers and each member’s particular responsibilities for this job. An introduction to the firm outlining its key industry specialisation, industry and strategic traits. A high level conception of the organisation’s capability to CSR with particular examples connected to a particular industry characteristic. Students are required to produce proof that their chosen firm is struggling to combine CSR and name major problems contributing to this vow. A opinion with ideas outlining the steps the organisation can/also can peaceable rob to change into more socially to blame, ethical and sustainable. A reference list that suggestions the entire sources dilapidated in conducting your research and presentation. Review Guidance To your neighborhood PowerPoint presentation you are expected to make narrate of visible materials, make parts, and infographics to successfully aid your account and masks your tips clearly whereas bettering the total presentation quality. Your neighborhood PowerPoint presentation would also can peaceable be recorded and uploaded by every member of the team of workers onto the module blackboard Phase 2 submission level sooner than the submission closing date stated above and on the module eLP. Your neighborhood presentation shall be based mostly totally totally on the research performed from tutorial sources (articles, textbooks, conference papers), authorities experiences, newspaper articles, practitioner literature and your chosen firm’s web page and their sustainability experiences. It is doubtless you’ll possibly additionally bid to the factual vow material lined in lectures and seminars in particular spherical to blame decision making, the triple backside line, CSR and CSI and other factual frameworks. You furthermore would possibly possibly can peaceable additionally keep in mind how the firm meets its sustainability agenda. We imply that for this section of the task you read industry connected newspapers and magazines similar to Monetary Cases, the Economist, the Cases, the Harvard Industry Review and quite so much of tutorial articles printed over the previous 10 years. Mapping to Programme Dreams and Targets Module Stage Targets: Records & Working out : MLO1: Love and severely review strategic opportunities and challenges inner a advanced international industry context. MLO2: Defend in thoughts the broader impression of strategic industry choices on social, financial and environmental contexts. Intellectual / Expert abilities & abilities: MLO3: Construct theoretically and empirically knowledgeable arguments referring to the nature of to blame industry. Non-public Values Attributes (World / Cultural awareness, Ethics, Curiosity) (PVA): MLO4: Deem to your interpersonal communication abilities and with ability to work inner multi-cultural groups. Programme (Stage) Studying Outcomes that this module contributes to: Records and Working out (Enough&U): 6.1.1 Appraise data of most modern official observe in industry and administration knowledgeable by notion and research. 6.1.2 Appraise data of industry and administration to advanced problems in or connected to official observe in bid to call justifiable, sustainable and to blame solutions. Intellectual / Expert Talents & Talents (IPSA): 6.2.1 Defend in thoughts effective interpersonal communication abilities and the ability to work in multi-cultural groups. Non-public Values Attributes (World / Cultural Awareness, Ethics, Curiosity) (PVA): 6.1.3 Appraise an awareness of the cultural and ethical contexts in which international industry operates. Need Knowledgeable Abet to your SM9689 Individual Assignment ? Glean A Free Quote Module Suppose Review Standards and Rubric Marking Rubric for Phase 1 Individual Assignment (75% weighting) Grade Nominal % Integer Vary Unsatisfactory 0-29% Insufficient 30-39% Enough 40-49% Factual 50-59% Very Factual 60-69% Honest 70-seventy nine% Prominent 80-100% Introduction 5% weighting (5 marks) No introduction to the document. Fully insufficient overview of the firm and its space inner the industry The introduction is now not effective. Insufficient overview of the firm and its space inner the industry Adequately effective introduction to the document. The overview of the firm and its space inner their industry is ample. Factual introduction to the document, which encompasses a accurate overview of the firm and its space inner the industry Very accurate introduction to the document, which encompasses a in truth accurate overview of the firm and its space inner the industry Honest introduction to the document, which encompasses an excellent overview of the firm’s space inner the industry Outstandingly effective introduction to the document, which contains an prominent overview of the firm’s space inner the industry Serious three-horizons evaluation 40% weighting (40 marks) Shrimp or no evaluation of the firm’s soundless, emerging and prospective activities, competencies and dynamic capabilities contributing to the firm’s competitive advantage and to blame future. Fully insufficient narrate of tag chain and resource-based mostly totally mostly gape theories. Insufficient evaluation of the firm’s soundless, emerging and prospective activities, competencies and dynamic capabilities contributing to the firm’s competitive advantage and to blame future. Fully insufficient narrate of tag chain and resource-based mostly totally mostly gape theories. Enough evaluation of the firm’s soundless, emerging and prospective activities, competencies and dynamic capabilities contributing to the firm’s competitive advantage and to blame future. Enough narrate of tag chain and resource-based mostly totally mostly gape theories. Factual important evaluation of the firm’s soundless, emerging and prospective activities, competencies and dynamic capabilities contributing to the firm’s competitive advantage and to blame future. Factual narrate of tag chain and resource-based mostly totally mostly gape theories. Very accurate important evaluation of the firm’s soundless, emerging and prospective activities, competencies and dynamic capabilities contributing to the firm’s competitive advantage and to blame future. Very accurate narrate of tag chain and resource-based mostly totally mostly gape theories. Honest important evaluation of the firm’s soundless, emerging and prospective activities, competencies and dynamic capabilities contributing to the firm’s competitive advantage and to blame future. Honest narrate of tag chain and resource-based mostly totally mostly gape theories. Prominent important evaluation of the firm’s soundless, emerging and prospective activities, competencies and dynamic capabilities contributing to the firm’s competitive advantage and to blame future. Prominent narrate of tag chain and resource-based mostly totally mostly gape theories. Stakeholder Review 40% weighting (40 marks) Shrimp or no review of the strategic course of the organisation from the level of gape of its key stakeholders. Shrimp or no discussion of the firm’s capability to tackling its CSI acts. Shrimp or no examples of rectification and narrate of connected notion and frameworks. Insufficient review of the strategic course of the organisation from the level of gape of its key stakeholders. Insufficient discussion of the firm’s capability to tackling its CSI acts. Insufficient examples of rectification and application of connected theories and frameworks. Enough review of the strategic course of the organisation from the level of gape of its key stakeholders. Enough discussion of the firm’s capability to tackling its CSI acts. Enough examples of rectification and application of connected theories and frameworks. Factual review of the strategic course of the organisation from the level of gape of its key stakeholders. Factual discussion of the firm’s capability to tackling its CSI acts. Factual examples of rectification and application of connected theories and frameworks. Very accurate review of the strategic course of the organisation from the level of gape of its key stakeholders. Very accurate discussion of the firm’s capability to tackling its CSI acts. Very accurate examples of rectification and application of connected theories and frameworks. Honest review of the strategic course of the organisation from the level of gape of its key stakeholders. Honest discussion of the firm’s capability to tackling its CSI acts. Honest examples of rectification and application of connected theories and frameworks. Prominent review of the strategic course of the organisation from the level of gape of its key stakeholders. Prominent discussion of the firm’s capability to tackling its CSI acts. The evaluation is supported with rich examples of rectification. Prominent application of connected theories and frameworks. Honest 2 Obj. 2 (No longer met) Honest 2 Obj. 2 (No longer met) Honest 2 Object 2 (Met) Honest 2 Object 2 (Met) Honest 2 Object 2 (Met) Honest 2 Object 2 (Exceeded) Honest 2 Object 2 (Exceeded) Recommen dations and conclusions 15% weighting (15 marks) Shrimp or no proof of ideas and conclusions being drawn from the evaluation in outdated sections. Shrimp or no proof of connected notion being dilapidated to point out the ideas. Insufficient ideas and conclusions being drawn from the evaluation in outdated sections. Insufficient narrate of connected notion to point out the ideas. Enough ideas and conclusions being drawn from the evaluation in outdated sections. Enough narrate of connected notion to point out ideas. Factual Enough ideas and conclusions being drawn from the evaluation in outdated sections. Factual narrate of connected notion to point out ideas. Very accurate ideas and conclusions being drawn from the evaluation in outdated sections. Very accurate narrate of connected notion to point out ideas. Honest ideas and conclusions being drawn from the evaluation in outdated sections. Honest narrate of connected notion to point out ideas. Prominent ideas and conclusions being drawn from the evaluation in outdated sections. Prominent narrate of connected notion to point out ideas. Marking Rubric for Phase 2 neighborhood Presentation (25% weighting) Grade Nominal % Integer Vary Unsatisfactory 0-29% Insufficient 30-39% Enough 40-49% Factual 50-59% Very Factual 60-69% Honest 70-seventy nine% Prominent 80-100% 25% weighting (25 marks) Presentation is unfortunate and unprofessional. Shrimp proof of research or evaluation. No or minute proof of the utilization of connected notion and frameworks. Shrimp or no proof of a opinion with obvious, tough and relevant ideas. Wretched narrate of visible materials, make parts, and infographics to reduction the account Presentation is unprofessional with minimal research and evaluation performed into the organisation. One or two tutorial sources dilapidated but lacks ample evaluation. A opinion lacks ample, obvious, tough and relevant ideas. Insufficient narrate of visible materials, make parts, and infographics to reduction the account Presentation requires enchancment. A minute of evaluation has been implemented but lacks depth and more tutorial and practitioner sources. Suggestions are classic or superficial. Enough narrate of visible materials, make parts, and infographics to reduction the account Factual presentation. Factual stage and vary of research undertaken although would possibly possibly possibly well now not be analysed in elephantine. Factual and logical ideas proposed. Factual narrate of visible materials, make parts, and infographics to successfully aid the account Very accurate presentation. Vast vary of research undertaken collectively with both tutorial and practitioner sources. Suggestions are logical and well connected to the evaluation undertaken. Very accurate narrate of visible materials, make parts, and infographics to successfully aid the account Honest and professionally performed presentation. Vast vary of research undertaken that is severely performed and linked to ideas. Suggestions based mostly totally totally on the research undertaken and masks modern pondering. Honest narrate of visible materials, make parts, and infographics to successfully aid the account and aid the total presentation quality. Prominent and professionally performed presentation. Vast research undertaken collectively with a entire vary of relevant tutorial and practitioner literature. Sophisticated modern ideas proposed that get hold of from a severely performed research and evaluation. Prominent narrate of visible materials, make parts, and infographics to successfully aid the account and aid the total presentation quality. Honest 2 Obj 2.1 (No longer met); Honest 3 Obj 3.1 (No longer met); Honest 3 Obj 3.2 (No longer met) Honest 2 Obj 2.1 (No longer met); Honest 3 Obj 3.1 (No longer met); Honest 3 Obj 3.2 (No longer met) Honest 2 Obj 2.1 (Met); Honest 3 Obj 3.1 (Met); Honest 3 Obj 3.2 (Met) Honest 2 Obj 2.1 (Met); Honest 3 Obj 3.1 (Met); Honest 3 Obj 3.2 (Met) Honest 2 Obj 2.1 (Met); Honest 3 Obj 3.1 (Met); Honest 3 Obj 3.2 (Met) Honest 2 Obj 2.1 (Exceeded); Honest 3 Obj 3.1 (Exceeded); Honest 3 Obj 3.2 (Exceeded) Honest 2 Obj 2.1 (Exceeded); Honest 3 Obj 3.1 (Exceeded); Honest 3 Obj 3.2 (Exceeded) ASSESSMENT REGULATIONS You furthermore would possibly possibly can very well be knowledgeable to read the guidance for college students referring to evaluation insurance policies. They are available in online: https://www.northumbria.ac.uk/about-us/university-companies/student-library-and-tutorial-companies/quality-and-instructing-excellence/evaluation/evaluation-rules-and-insurance policies Tutorial Misconduct The Review Guidelines for Taught Awards (ARTA) occupy the Guidelines and procedures applying to dishonest, plagiarism, the utilization of Synthetic Intelligence (AI) Programs, and other forms of tutorial misconduct . The elephantine coverage is available: https://northumbria-cdn.azureedge.gain/-/media/instructing-excellence/pl,-d-,005-v005-tutorial-misconduct-coverage.pdf?modified=20230315105545 You furthermore would possibly possibly can very well be reminded that plagiarism, collusion, the utilization of Synthetic Intelligence (AI) Programs, and other forms of tutorial misconduct, as referred to within the Tutorial Misconduct approach of the evaluation rules, are taken very seriously. Assignments in which proof of plagiarism or other forms of tutorial misconduct is found also can fetch a sign of zero. Leisurely submission of labor The put coursework is submitted without approval, after the broadcast hand-in closing date, the next penalties will observe. For coursework submitted as much as 1 working day (24 hours) after the broadcast hand-in closing date without approval, 10% of the entire marks available for the evaluation (i.e.100%) would possibly possibly be deducted from the evaluation sign. For readability: a slow fragment of labor that can possibly well admire scored 65%, 55% or forty five% had it been handed in on time shall be awarded 55%, forty five% or 35% respectively as 10% of the entire available marks can admire been deducted. The Penalty would now not observe to Lumber/Fail Modules, i.e. there shall be no penalty for slow submission if assessments on Lumber/Fail are submitted as much as 1 working day (24 hours) after the broadcast hand-in closing date. Coursework submitted larger than 1 day (24 hours) after the broadcast hand-in closing date without approval shall be marked as zero but shall be eligible for referral. The reassessment also can peaceable the put appropriate, and as sure by the Module Leader, be the same approach (e.g. essay) but possibly with a obvious job (e.g. numerous essay title) or with the same job (e.g. the same essay title) as indicated within the Module guide. In modules the put there would possibly possibly be bigger than one evaluation component, Students are now not required to entire all evaluation parts if an total Lumber Stamp (40% UG, 50% PGT) has been finished. The single permitted exception shall be in instances the put the College is prevented from doing so by a PSRB requirement. In the case of PSRB necessities, a variation bid shall be required from the rules. In modules, the put there would possibly possibly be bigger than one evaluation component and an total circulate sign has now not been finished, Students shall be eligible for a referral* within the person failed module and/or now not tried component(s) of evaluation. These provisions observe to all assessments, collectively with those assessed on a Lumber/Fail foundation. The elephantine coverage also can additionally be found at: https://northumbria-cdn.azureedge.gain/-/media/instructing-excellence/pl,-d-,008-v005-slow-submission-of-work-and-extension-requests-coverage-stc.pdf?modified=20230401131943 Observe limits The notice count is to be declared on the front page of your task and the task masks sheet. The notice count would now not embody: · Title and Contents page · Reference list · Appendices · Appropriate tables, figures and illustrations · Glossary · Bibliography · Quotes from interviews and level of curiosity groups. If the task is inner +10% of the stated notice limit no penalty will observe. Please masks, in text citations [e.g. (Smith, 2011)] and instruct secondary quotations [e.g. “dib-dab nonsense analysis” (Smith, 2011 p.123)] are INCLUDED within the notice count. If this notice count is falsified, college students are reminded that under ARTA this would possibly be belief to be tutorial misconduct. For those assessments the put college students are required to protect to the notice limit, it is miles proposed that they are able to also peaceable be knowledgeable that the marker will give up reading on the level as soon as they resolve that the notice limit exceeds the advised notice count by larger than 10%. The marker will level to the level at which they give up reading on the text. Students must retain an digital copy of this task (collectively with ALL appendices) and it want to be made available inner 24hours of them inquiring for it be submitted. The elephantine Observe Restrict Protection is available right here Prick-off dates and penalties for presentations The time allotted for the presentation want to be adhered to. On the tip of this time, the presentation shall be stopped and also can peaceable be marked based mostly totally totally on what has been delivered inner the closing date. Group Work The neighborhood work coverage also can additionally be found right here Can’t Total Your Northumbria To blame Strategy Document and Group Presentation on Time? Glean A Free Quote
- WE OFFER THE BEST CUSTOM PAPER WRITING SERVICES. WE HAVE DONE THIS QUESTION BEFORE, WE CAN ALSO DO IT FOR YOU.
- Assignment status: Already Solved By Our Experts
- (USA, AUS, UK & CA PhD. Writers)
- CLICK HERE TO GET A PROFESSIONAL WRITER TO WORK ON THIS PAPER AND OTHER SIMILAR PAPERS, GET A NON PLAGIARIZED PAPER FROM OUR EXPERTS
QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPER – NO ChatGPT.NO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER
Looking for unparalleled custom paper writing services? Our team of experienced professionals at AcademicWritersBay.com is here to provide you with top-notch assistance that caters to your unique needs.
We understand the importance of producing original, high-quality papers that reflect your personal voice and meet the rigorous standards of academia. That’s why we assure you that our work is completely plagiarism-free—we craft bespoke solutions tailored exclusively for you.
Why Choose AcademicWritersBay.com?
- Our papers are 100% original, custom-written from scratch.
- We’re here to support you around the clock, any day of the year.
- You’ll find our prices competitive and reasonable.
- We handle papers across all subjects, regardless of urgency or difficulty.
- Need a paper urgently? We can deliver within 6 hours!
- Relax with our on-time delivery commitment.
- We offer money-back and privacy guarantees to ensure your satisfaction and confidentiality.
- Benefit from unlimited amendments upon request to get the paper you envisioned.
- We pledge our dedication to meeting your expectations and achieving the grade you deserve.
Our Process: Getting started with us is as simple as can be. Here’s how to do it:
- Click on the “Place Your Order” tab at the top or the “Order Now” button at the bottom. You’ll be directed to our order form.
- Provide the specifics of your paper in the “PAPER DETAILS” section.
- Select your academic level, the deadline, and the required number of pages.
- Click on “CREATE ACCOUNT & SIGN IN” to provide your registration details, then “PROCEED TO CHECKOUT.”
- Follow the simple payment instructions and soon, our writers will be hard at work on your paper.
AcademicWritersBay.com is dedicated to expediting the writing process without compromising on quality. Our roster of writers boasts individuals with advanced degrees—Masters and PhDs—in a myriad of disciplines, ensuring that no matter the complexity or field of your assignment, we have the expertise to tackle it with finesse. Our quick turnover doesn’t mean rushed work; it means efficiency and priority handling, ensuring your deadlines are met with the excellence your academics demand.
