ASSESSMENT BRIEF
BUS9005 Economics for International Industry
Evaluation 2
| Evaluation Description | Microeconomics Account |
| Particular particular person/Team | Particular particular person |
| Dimension | 1,500 phrases |
| Self-discipline Studying Outcomes | a, b, c, d |
| Week Due | Week 9 |
| Weighting | 30% |
| Relate of Generative Artificial Intelligence (Gen AI) | Not allowed |
Overview of the Evaluation Job
On this particular particular person assessment, it’s possible you’ll perchance perchance be required to look at microeconomic theories and ideas to analyse the market wherein a particular Australian company operates. This file will assess your skill to critically review how market forces, market constructions, and market screw ups impact industry intention and public policy.
You should pick out one Australian company (from any industry equivalent to retail, transport, technology, mining, finance, etc.) and learn about:
- The provision and rely on stipulations shaping the company’s market
- The market constructing and its implications for industry intention
- Any related market failure(s) and how public policy addresses them.
This task encourages you to link conception to staunch-world Australian industry stipulations, showcasing your skill to mediate critically and observe financial reasoning to realistic industry challenges.
Evaluation Directions
Resolve one Australian company operating in a particular industry (e.g., retail, banking, transport, vitality, technology) and put together a 1500-observe analytical file addressing the following:
Fragment A: Company and Market Context (Approx. 300 phrases)
- Portray your chosen company and its major companies and products or merchandise, major potentialities and competitors
- Present at the least one half of proof out of your chosen company (e.g., screenshot or link to annual file, product page, or media launch).
Fragment B: Market Dynamics (Approx. 400 phrases)
- Decide out one particular companies and products or merchandise provided by your chosen company.
- Title three components that pick rely on and three components that pick provide for this product/carrier.
- Discuss about how adjustments in these components impact rely on and provide. Relate rely on and provide curves to illustrate the outcomes (hand-drawn, digital, or spreadsheet graphs are acceptable).
- Present at the least one half of proof out of your chosen company, or credible market sources. (e.g., screenshot or link to annual file, product page, or media launch).
Fragment C: Market Construction and Method (Approx. 400 phrases)
- Title and account for the market constructing wherein your company operates (excellent competitors, monopolistic competitors, oligopoly, or monopoly).
- Clearly provide three reasons supporting your classification (e.g., selection of competitors, product differentiation, boundaries to entry, pricing vitality).
- Show how this market constructing influences the company’s strategic choices equivalent to pricing, innovation, or advertising.
- Present at the least one half of proof out of your chosen company, or credible market sources. (e.g., screenshot or link to annual file, product page, or media launch).
Fragment D: Market Failure and Protection Response (Approx. 400 phrases)
- Title a related market failure affecting your chosen company or industry (e.g., pollution, records asymmetry, beneath-provision of public goods).
- Analyse how this failure impacts the company, consumers, or society.
- Evaluation an Australian govt policy or regulation addressing this danger and focus on whether it successfully corrects the procedure back.
- Present at the least one half of proof to aid your resolution (e.g., screenshot or link to annual file, product page, or media launch).
Evaluation Phases and Mark Allocation
| Stage | Description | Week Due | Marks |
| Checkpoint 1 Company Need and Rationale | Decide out one Australian company and post your different in the Dialogue Forum. Most lively three college students could perchance also fair pick out the the same company. Present a short justification (100–150 phrases) explaining why you chose this company. | Week 4 | 3 marks |
| Checkpoint 2 Draft Submission | Put up a short draft (roughly 400–500 phrases) displaying your progress. This could also fair unruffled consist of early sections (Fragment A and B) with some preliminary records or graphs. The draft could perchance also fair unruffled pronounce staunch progress and working out, no longer a full file. | Week 8 | 2 marks |
| Final Account Submission | Put up your accomplished 1,500-observe file addressing Ingredients A–D. | Week 9 | 25 marks |
Other Directions
- Construction of the file – Introduction, solutions to segment A-D, summary/conclusion, reference list.
- Reference list is no longer segment of the observe depend.
- Submission layout- observe file. All submissions thru Turnitin on Canvas.
This assessment could perchance also fair unruffled incorporate APA seventh referencing model. For aid on reference mediate in regards to the AIHE Studying Toughen Hub on canvas for extra records.
Relate of GenAI is no longer allowed:
On this assessment, the utilization of generative man made intelligence (GenAI) tools is no longer licensed. These tools consist of recount mills, records analysis tools, and other AI-assisted technologies. Students must make certain that their work is entirely their very rep. Any submission that entails recount created by unauthorised explain of man made intelligence tools is a breach of academic integrity.
Marking Criteria
Please seek advice from the linked rubric for marking criteria and requirements of performance. Optimistic solutions could be offered within a successfully timed formulation in line with AIHE Evaluation Direction of.
This assessment is no longer redeemable except in every other case specified.
Limits for Assessments
Written submissions that exceed the observe restrict by more than 10% will discontinue to be marked from the level at which that restrict is exceeded.
Closing dates for in-particular person or video presentations that exceed the allocated closing date by more than 10% will discontinue to be marked from the level at which that restrict is exceeded, and Lecturers could perchance also fair quiz college students to discontinue their presentation.
Evaluation Variation and Special Consideration
Students could be eligible for a variation to assessment arrangements when sudden or extenuating circumstances impact on their performance or their skill to whole their assessment tasks by or on the specified date. Students must whole the Software to Fluctuate Evaluation with proof.
Students with identified, particular or particular needs could perchance also fair observe for adaptations to assessment in the topic. Students are required to contact the Student Toughen Officer or Student Studying Consultant to chat about their particular needs.
Tiresome Assignment Submission Penalties
An assessment task is leisurely for submission when it’s no longer submitted by the due date and time as indicated on Canvas, or by an agreed extension date and time as confirmed by the topic lecturer.
Tiresome assessment tasks could be penalised at the bustle of 5% of most that it’s possible you’ll perchance be factor in marks, per calendar day (i.e. 24 hours or segment thereof). After seven (7) calendar days, assignments will entice zero (0) marks. Assignments submitted at any stage within the principle 24 hours after the closing date could be realizing of as to be in some unspecified time in the future leisurely and subsequently discipline to the associated penalty. For added detail mediate about: AIHE Evaluation Direction of.
Tutorial Integrity
Tutorial integrity is a foremost quality for larger training and is a main segment of studying and instructing. AIHE is committed to promoting academic integrity and moral behaviour. The recognition of AIHE and its graduates, and the academic standing of its skills rests with its skill to promote academic integrity and set up of living up academic misconduct somewhat and consistently.
All college students must change into familiar with, and understand the meaning and consequences of plagiarism, dishonest in exams and tests, unauthorised explain of man made intelligence, collusion, contract dishonest and other academic offences beneath the AIHE Tutorial Integrity Protection.
Marking Rubric & Requirements of Efficiency
Particular particular person Account (Microeconomics)
| Criteria | High Distinction (85-100%) | Distinction (75-84%) | Credit (65-74%) | Circulation (50-64%) | Fail (0-49%) |
| Checkpoint 1: Company Need & Rationale (3 marks) | Company selection is recurring, highly related, and successfully-justified with obvious reasoning and proof of initiative. | Company clearly justified; sound rationale offered. | Relevant company chosen with overall justification. | Company popular but light or unclear justification. | No submission, leisurely post, or unjustified different. |
| Checkpoint 2: Draft Progress Submission (2 marks) | Optimistic and crucial progress. Demonstrates earn working out of conception and explain of proof. | Superb progress and partial analysis shown. | Some progress is obvious but uneven or tiny. | Minimal progress lacks meaningful pattern. | No or superficial draft submitted. |
| Fragment A: Company & Market Context (5 marks) | Offers an legal, concise, and insightful overview of the company, its major merchandise/companies and products, potentialities, and competitors. Involves at the least one related, verified half of proof (e.g. screenshot or link). | Optimistic description of company and context; mostly legal proof dilapidated successfully. | Reasonable description; minor gaps or tiny proof. | Frequent or in part appropriate overview; minimal or unclear proof. | Wrong or incomplete company description; no supporting proof. |
| Fragment B – Market Dynamics (6 marks) | Thorough and successfully-structured analysis of three rely on and three provide components. Clearly explains how adjustments impact the market the utilization of legal, labelled graphs. Integrates credible proof from company or market sources. | Superb clarification of rely on and provide components with mostly obvious diagrams and proof. | Ample analysis, some conception utilized; graphs or proof tiny or partly wrong. | Frequent or uneven discussion of components; light theoretical links or unclear graphs. | Erroneous or missing discussion; lacks theoretical working out or proof. |
| Fragment C – Market Construction and Method (7 marks) | Market constructing precisely identified and convincingly justified with three earn reasons (selection of competitors, differentiation, boundaries, pricing vitality). Insightful analysis of strategic implications (pricing, innovation, advertising). Uses related and verified proof. | Lawful classification and justification with factual discussion of intention; sound proof. | Reasonable identification and partial justification; some reference to intention and proof. | Restricted or in part appropriate identification; light justification or minimal strategic link. | Erroneous or missing classification; no obvious reasoning or proof. |
| Fragment D – Market Failure and Protection Response (5 marks) | Clearly name the related market failure(s). Offers serious analysis of impact on company, consumers and society; evaluates policy response with perception and credible proof. | Superb analysis of market failure and policy with related examples. | Ample discussion; essentially descriptive with some evaluate. | Frequent or generalised description; tiny policy discussion. | Wrong or missing discussion; no link to proof or policy. |
| Tutorial Writing, Referencing & Integrity (2 marks) | Superb organisation, academic tone, and legal referencing (APA 7); completely demonstrates originality and integrity. | Optimistic writing and mostly appropriate referencing; factual proof of authenticity. | Ample writing. Some referencing or clarity complications. | Identical old constructing or referencing. Restricted demonstration of rep work. | Poorly written or referenced. Doable academic integrity issues. |
- WE OFFER THE BEST CUSTOM PAPER WRITING SERVICES. WE HAVE DONE THIS QUESTION BEFORE, WE CAN ALSO DO IT FOR YOU.
- Assignment status: Already Solved By Our Experts
- (USA, AUS, UK & CA PhD. Writers)
- CLICK HERE TO GET A PROFESSIONAL WRITER TO WORK ON THIS PAPER AND OTHER SIMILAR PAPERS, GET A NON PLAGIARIZED PAPER FROM OUR EXPERTS
QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPER – NO ChatGPT.NO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER
Looking for unparalleled custom paper writing services? Our team of experienced professionals at AcademicWritersBay.com is here to provide you with top-notch assistance that caters to your unique needs.
We understand the importance of producing original, high-quality papers that reflect your personal voice and meet the rigorous standards of academia. That’s why we assure you that our work is completely plagiarism-free—we craft bespoke solutions tailored exclusively for you.
Why Choose AcademicWritersBay.com?
- Our papers are 100% original, custom-written from scratch.
- We’re here to support you around the clock, any day of the year.
- You’ll find our prices competitive and reasonable.
- We handle papers across all subjects, regardless of urgency or difficulty.
- Need a paper urgently? We can deliver within 6 hours!
- Relax with our on-time delivery commitment.
- We offer money-back and privacy guarantees to ensure your satisfaction and confidentiality.
- Benefit from unlimited amendments upon request to get the paper you envisioned.
- We pledge our dedication to meeting your expectations and achieving the grade you deserve.
Our Process: Getting started with us is as simple as can be. Here’s how to do it:
- Click on the “Place Your Order” tab at the top or the “Order Now” button at the bottom. You’ll be directed to our order form.
- Provide the specifics of your paper in the “PAPER DETAILS” section.
- Select your academic level, the deadline, and the required number of pages.
- Click on “CREATE ACCOUNT & SIGN IN” to provide your registration details, then “PROCEED TO CHECKOUT.”
- Follow the simple payment instructions and soon, our writers will be hard at work on your paper.
AcademicWritersBay.com is dedicated to expediting the writing process without compromising on quality. Our roster of writers boasts individuals with advanced degrees—Masters and PhDs—in a myriad of disciplines, ensuring that no matter the complexity or field of your assignment, we have the expertise to tackle it with finesse. Our quick turnover doesn’t mean rushed work; it means efficiency and priority handling, ensuring your deadlines are met with the excellence your academics demand.
