Healthcare Policy and Prognosis Policy What are legislators currently doing to deal with your chosen advocacy priorities for a inclined population? Are there most up to date insurance policies in pickle? Are there most up to date insurance policies
What are legislators currently doing to deal with your chosen advocacy priorities for a inclined population? Are there most up to date insurance policies in pickle? Are there most up to date insurance policies proposed at either the relate or federal stage? What are primarily the most evident strengths and weaknesses of these insurance policies as they repeat to your advocacy priority? What may perchance presumably well need to change?
For this Discussion, you’ll be in a position to name a relate or federal protection that aligns with your advocacy priority. After figuring out the protection, you’ll be in a position to take be conscious of how the protection aligns and helps your identified inclined population. How and why does this protection align with your advocacy priorities?
Sources
It’s well-known to positively compare the Learning Sources earlier than finishing this declare. Click the weekly sources hyperlink to derive admission to the sources.
WEEKLY RESOURCES
Learning Sources
Required Sources
Readings
Dawes, D. E. (2020). The political determinants of health. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Chapter 5, “Wining the Recreation That By no way Ends: Success Way Continuous Employment of the Political Determinants of Health” (pp. 112–130)
Porche, D. J. (2023). Health protection: Functions for nurses and varied healthcare experts (third ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Chapter 15, “Politics: Thought and Apply” (pp. 201–237)
Doc: Inner most Legislative Agenda and Dawdle Thought Exemplar (Observe Doc)Download Inner most Legislative Agenda and Dawdle Thought Exemplar (Observe Doc)
Association of Public Health Nurses Public Health Policy Committee. (2021). Public health protection advocacy guidebook and instrument kitLinks to an exterior space.. https://www.phnurse.org/property/doctors/APHN%20Public%20Health%20Policy%20Advocacy%20Guidebook%20and%20Toolkit%20_May%202021.pdf
Congress.govLinks to an exterior space.. (2022). https://www.congress.gov/
Congress.gov. (2022). Yelp legislative websitesLinks to an exterior space. [Interactive media]. https://www.congress.gov/relate-legislature-websites
Gustafson, A. (2017, December 12). be a political affect—as a median citizen. CurrentsLinks to an exterior space.. https://smea.uw.edu/currents/how-to-be-a-political-affect-as-an-common-citizen/
Rees, A. (2013, August 6). Digital and on-line activismLinks to an exterior space.. Reset: Digital for True. https://en.reset.org/digital-and-on-line-activism/
Social Present. (n.d.). Policy, advocacy, and communications toolkitLinks to an exterior space.. https://alliance1.org/web/sources/pubs/protection-advocacy-communications-toolkit.aspx
White, N. (2018). Introduction: Why be taught the Effective Activist Files. InEffective activist: An explanation-primarily based data to revolutionary social changeLinks to an exterior space.(pp. 6–10). Effective Activist. https://effectiveactivist.com/intro/
To Put together:
Review sources connected to health protection.
Appreciate in mind the health protection that would align with your advocacy priorities.
Put up a response detailing the next:
Title a proposed relate and federal protection that aligns with your advocacy priorities in your inclined population. Clearly portray and offer evidence to motivate this protection. If the protection desires to change, portray and offer evidence to motivate the proposed change.
Project Rubric InformationCease
Rubric
NURS_8100_Week5-7_Discussion1_Rubric
NURS_8100_Week5-7_Discussion1_Rubric
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRESPONSIVENESS TO DISCUSSION QUESTION (20 conceivable aspects) Discussion submit minimum requirements: The favorite posting need to be performed by Day 3 at 10:59 pm CT. Two response postings to two varied search data from favorite posts, on two varied days, are required by Day 6 at 10:59 pm CT. College member inquiries require responses, which usually are not integrated in the search data from posts. Your Discussion Board postings desires to be written in Fashioned Academic English and prepare APA 7 style for layout and grammar as carefully as conceivable given the constraints of the on-line platform. It’s well-known to positively motivate the postings with explicit citations from this week’s finding out sources as well to sources available thru the Walden University library and varied credible on-line sources (pointers, educated opinions and deal of others.)
20 to >19.0 pts
Lovely
• Discussion postings and responses are attentive to and exceed the requirements of the Discussion instructions. • The student responds to the search data from/s being requested or the instructed/s offered. Goes beyond what’s required in some indispensable way (e.g., the submit contributes a recent dimension, unearths something unanticipated) • Demonstrates that the student has be taught, viewed, and regarded as a differ of finding out sources, as well to sources available thru the Walden University library and varied credible on-line sources (pointers, educated opinions and deal of others.) • Exceeds the minimum requirements for discussion posts.
19 to >15.0 pts
True
• Discussion postings and responses are attentive to and meet the requirements of the Discussion instructions. • The student responds to the search data from/s being requested or the instructed/s offered. • Demonstrates that the student has be taught, viewed, and regarded as a differ of finding out sources, as well to sources available thru the Walden University library and varied credible on-line sources (pointers, educated opinions and deal of others.) • Meets the minimum requirements for discussion posts.
15 to >12.0 pts
Dazzling
• Discussion postings and responses are reasonably attentive to the requirements of the Discussion instructions. • The student may perchance presumably well not clearly deal with the goals of the discussion or the search data from/s or instructed/s. • Minimally demonstrates that the student has be taught, viewed, and regarded as a differ of finding out sources, as well to sources available thru the Walden University library and varied credible on-line sources (pointers, educated opinions and deal of others.) • Does not meet the minimum requirements for discussion posts; has not posted by the due date at least in part.
12 to >0 pts
Abominable
• Discussion postings and responses are unresponsive to the requirements of the Discussion instructions. • Does not clearly deal with the goals of the discussion or the search data from/s or instructed/s. • Does not demonstrate that the student has be taught, viewed, and regarded as a differ of finding out sources, as well to sources available thru the Walden University library and varied credible on-line sources (pointers, educated opinions and deal of others.) • Does not meet the requirements for discussion posts; has not posted by the due date and did not focus on about leisurely submit timing with college.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCONTENT REFLECTION and MASTERY: Initial Put up (30 conceivable aspects)
30 to >29.0 pts
Lovely
Initial Discussion posting: • Put up demonstrates mastery and thoughtful/valid utility of impart and/or methods presented in the route. • Posts are substantive and reflective, with extreme evaluation and synthesis consultant of data gained from the route readings and most up to date credible evidence. • Initial submit is supported by 3 or extra connected examples and research/evidence from a differ of scholarly sources together with route and open air readings.
29 to >23.0 pts
True
Initial Discussion posting: • Posts demonstrate some mastery and utility of impart, acceptable skills, or methods presented in the route. • Posts are substantive and reflective, with evaluation and synthesis consultant of data gained from the route readings and most up to date credible evidence. • Initial submit is supported by 3 or extra connected examples and research/evidence from a differ of scholarly sources together with route and open air readings.
23 to >18.0 pts
Dazzling
Initial Discussion posting: • Put up may perchance presumably well lack large, reflection, evaluation, or synthesis nonetheless count extra on anecdotal than scholarly evidence. • Posts demonstrate minimal realizing of ideas and concerns presented in the route, and, though in most cases valid, new some omissions and/or errors. • There is an absence of motivate from connected scholarly research/evidence.
18 to >0 pts
Abominable
Initial Discussion posting: • Put up lacks in substance, reflection, evaluation, or synthesis. • Posts derive not generalize, lengthen thinking or take be conscious of ideas and concerns internal the topic or context of the discussion. • Relevant examples and scholarly sources usually are not offered.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCONTRIBUTION TO THE DISCUSSION: First Response (20 conceivable aspects)
20 to >19.0 pts
Lovely
Discussion response: • Greatly contributes to the usual of the discussion/interplay and thinking and finding out. • Provides rich and connected examples and notion-provoking solutions that demonstrates recent perspectives, and synthesis of solutions supported by the literature. • Scholarly sources are precisely cited and formatted. • First response is supported by 2 or extra connected examples and research/evidence from a differ of scholarly sources together with route and open air readings. • Responds to questions posed by college.
19 to >15.0 pts
True
Discussion response: • Contributes to the usual of the interplay/discussion and finding out. • Provides connected examples and/or notion-provoking solutions • Scholarly sources are precisely cited and formatted. • First response is supported by 2 or extra connected examples and research/evidence from a differ of scholarly sources together with route and open air readings. • Responds to questions posed by college.
15 to >12.0 pts
Dazzling
Discussion response: • Minimally contributes to the usual of the interplay/discussion and finding out. • Provides few examples to motivate thoughts. • Files offered lacks evidence of extreme thinking or synthesis of solutions. • There is a lack of motivate from connected scholarly research/evidence. • No response to questions posed by college.
12 to >0 pts
Abominable
Discussion response: • Does not make a contribution to the usual of the interplay/discussion and finding out. • Lacks connected examples or solutions. • There is an absence of motivate from connected scholarly research/evidence. • No response to questions posed by college.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCONTRIBUTION TO THE DISCUSSION: Second Response (20 conceivable aspects)
20 to >19.0 pts
Lovely
Discussion response: • Greatly contributes to the usual of the discussion/interplay and thinking and finding out. • Provides connected examples and notion-provoking solutions that demonstrates recent perspectives, and large synthesis of solutions supported by the literature. • Second response is supported by 2 or extra connected examples and research/evidence from a differ of scholarly sources together with route and open air readings. • Scholarly sources are precisely cited and formatted. • Responds to questions posed by college.
19 to >15.0 pts
True
Discussion response: • Contributes to the usual of the interplay/discussion and finding out. • Provides connected examples and/or notion-provoking solutions • Second response is supported by 2 or extra connected examples and research/evidence from a differ of scholarly sources together with route and open air readings. • Scholarly sources are precisely cited and formatted. • Responds to questions posed by college.
15 to >12.0 pts
Dazzling
Discussion response: • Minimally contributes to the usual of the interplay/discussion and finding out. • Provides few examples to motivate thoughts. • Files offered lacks evidence of extreme thinking or synthesis of solutions. • Minimal scholarly sources offered to motivate submit. • Does not respond to questions posed by college.
12 to >0 pts
Abominable
Discussion response: • Does not make a contribution to the usual of the interplay/discussion and finding out. • Lacks connected examples or solutions. • No sources offered. • Does not respond to questions posed by college.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQUALITY OF WRITING (10 conceivable aspects)
10 to >9.0 pts
Lovely
Discussion postings and responses exceed doctoral stage writing expectations: • Use Fashioned Academic English that is evident, concise, and appropriate to doctoral stage writing. • Invent few if any errors in spelling, grammar, that doesn’t have an affect on sure dialog. • Makes exhaust of correct APA 7 layout as carefully as conceivable given the constraints of the on-line platform. • Are sure, courteous, and respectful when offering ideas, positive feedback, or opposing viewpoints.
9 to >8.0 pts
True
Discussion postings and responses meet doctoral stage writing expectations: • Use Fashioned Academic English that is evident and appropriate to doctoral stage writing • Makes about a errors in spelling, grammar, that doesn’t have an affect on sure dialog. • Makes exhaust of correct APA 7 layout as carefully as conceivable given the constraints of the on-line platform. • Are courteous and respectful when offering ideas, positive feedback, or opposing viewpoints.
8 to >6.0 pts
Dazzling
Discussion postings and responses are reasonably under doctoral stage writing expectations: • Posts contains extra than one spelling, grammar, and/or punctuation deviations from Fashioned Academic English which have an affect on sure dialog. • Varied errors in APA 7 layout • Would be much less than courteous and respectful when offering ideas, feedback, or opposing viewpoints.
6 to >0 pts
Abominable
Discussion postings and responses are neatly under doctoral stage writing expectations: • Posts contains extra than one spelling, grammar, and/or punctuation deviations from Fashioned Academic English which have an affect on sure dialog. • Makes exhaust of unsuitable APA 7 layout • Are discourteous and disrespectful when offering ideas, feedback, or opposing viewpoints.
Looking for unparalleled custom paper writing services? Our team of experienced professionals at AcademicWritersBay.com is here to provide you with top-notch assistance that caters to your unique needs.
We understand the importance of producing original, high-quality papers that reflect your personal voice and meet the rigorous standards of academia. That’s why we assure you that our work is completely plagiarism-free—we craft bespoke solutions tailored exclusively for you.
Why Choose AcademicWritersBay.com?
Our papers are 100% original, custom-written from scratch.
We’re here to support you around the clock, any day of the year.
You’ll find our prices competitive and reasonable.
We handle papers across all subjects, regardless of urgency or difficulty.
Need a paper urgently? We can deliver within 6 hours!
Relax with our on-time delivery commitment.
We offer money-back and privacy guarantees to ensure your satisfaction and confidentiality.
Benefit from unlimited amendments upon request to get the paper you envisioned.
We pledge our dedication to meeting your expectations and achieving the grade you deserve.
Our Process: Getting started with us is as simple as can be. Here’s how to do it:
Click on the “Place Your Order” tab at the top or the “Order Now” button at the bottom. You’ll be directed to our order form.
Provide the specifics of your paper in the “PAPER DETAILS” section.
Select your academic level, the deadline, and the required number of pages.
Follow the simple payment instructions and soon, our writers will be hard at work on your paper.
AcademicWritersBay.com is dedicated to expediting the writing process without compromising on quality. Our roster of writers boasts individuals with advanced degrees—Masters and PhDs—in a myriad of disciplines, ensuring that no matter the complexity or field of your assignment, we have the expertise to tackle it with finesse. Our quick turnover doesn’t mean rushed work; it means efficiency and priority handling, ensuring your deadlines are met with the excellence your academics demand.
