MOD009379 Principles of World Project Administration Review 011 Brief 2026 | a.r.u

MOD009379 ASSESSMENT INSTRUCTIONS

Review:	Coursework – Analytical Picture (Serbia Main Education Project)
Review code:	011
Academic Year:	2026
Trimester:	3
Module Title:	Principles of World Project Administration
Module Code:	MOD009379
Level:	7
Module Chief:	Titus Kehinde Olaniyi
Weighting:	60%
Word Limit:	3,000 phrases This excludes bibliography and varied objects listed in rule 6.75 of the Academic Regulations: http://net.anglia.ac.uk/anet/academic/public/acad emic_regs.pdf
Assessed Studying Outcomes:	Info and Understanding: 2. Severely note how tasks are initiated and growth thru a lifestyles cycle to completion and decommissioning. Intellectual, functional, efficient, and transferable abilities 3. Answer to the ‘project atmosphere’ and exercise and deploy instruments and tactics to put together, scope and put together the project thru its lifestyles cycle.
Submission Scale back-off date:	Please refer to the time limit on the VLE

WRITING YOUR ASSIGNMENT:

This assignment must be finished personally.
It be predominant to make exercise of the Harvard referencing machine.
Your work must point out the selection of phrases you need to presumably well perhaps presumably honest beget frail. Written assignments must no longer exceed the specified most selection of phrases. When a written assignment is marked, the outrageous exercise of phrases beyond the word limit is mirrored within the educational judgement of the share of work which ends in a decrease model being awarded for the share of work (regulation 6.74).
Task submissions are to be made anonymously. Attain no longer write your title any place on your work.
Write your pupil ID number on the tip of each page.
Where the assignment contains a pair of job, all tasks must be submitted in a single describe.
It be predominant to number all pages.

SUBMITTING YOUR ASSIGNMENT:

To carry out fats marks, you have to to submit your work sooner than the time limit. Work that is submitted leisurely – in case your work is submitted on the equal day as the time limit by silly evening, your model will net a 10% penalty. In case you submit your work up to TWO working days after the published submission time limit – this could presumably well perhaps honest be accredited and marked. On the opposite hand, the insist of the module’s evaluation to which the work contributes will seemingly be capped with a most model of fifty%.
Work can’t be submitted if the interval of two working days after the time limit has passed (unless there is an authorized extension). Failure to submit within the related interval will mean that you need to presumably well perhaps presumably honest beget failed the evaluation.
Requests for transient-term extensions will handiest be idea to be within the case of illness or varied motive idea to be legit by the Director of Reviews Crew. Please contact DoS@london.aru.ac.uk. A quiz of must in total be got and agreed by the Director of Reviews Crew in writing no longer no longer up to 24 hours sooner than the time limit. Behold ideas 6.64-6.73: http://net.anglia.ac.uk/anet/academic/public/academic_reg s.pdf
Distinctive Circumstances: The time limit for submission of mitigation in relation to this assignment is never any later than five working days after the submission date of this work. Please contact the Director of Reviews Crew – DoS@london.aru.ac.uk.
Behold ideas 6.112 –6.141: http://net.anglia.ac.uk/anet/academic/public/academic_regs.pdf

ASSESSMENT TASKS

Background:

UCL Institute of Education, (https://www.ucl.ac.uk/ioe/), is usually recognised as even handed one of the most excellent Universities for teacher coaching. For this evaluation, you will deem the honest of a college member of UCL’s Department of Curriculum, Pedagogy and Review, (https://www.ucl.ac.uk/ioe/departments-and-centres/curriculum-pedagogy-and-evaluation), who thru the UCL Consultants’, (https://www.ucl.ac.uk/consultants/work-ucl-consultants), Service prefer to hiss for the ‘Serbia Inclusive Main Education Enchancment Project’.

(look page 6 of the Serbia Project overview on the VLE (and also readily available within the market at (https://tasks.worldbank.org/en/tasks-operations/describe-insist/P181557?form=tasks).

The Institute of Project Administration defines project scope as outlining the boundaries and targets of a project, specifying what’s integrated and excluded, and defining how the crew will ship the stay result. It’s miles a truly predominant section in project planning that establishes the project’s goals, deliverables, funds, and agenda. Effectively managing scope ensures alignment with organizational goals, manages stakeholder expectations, and prevents “scope sail” (uncontrolled addition of formula or tasks). The Institute of Project Administration extra defines five kinds of work breakdown construction (WBS), (deliverable-essentially based completely mostly, section-essentially based completely mostly, helpful resource-essentially based completely mostly, responsibility-essentially based completely mostly, and threat-essentially based completely mostly).

You should presumably well perhaps presumably very effectively be required to submit a proposal to the leadership crew of UCL Consultants, addressing the following tasks:

Task 1: Time desk management / Life cycles

Critique the utility of a helpful resource-essentially based completely mostly work breakdown construction in framing UCL’s Department of Curriculum, Pedagogy and Review’s hiss for the ‘consultancy-work.
(30 marks)

Task 2: Industry case / Budgeting and payment relief watch over

(a)The usage of recordsdata from the ‘Serbia Inclusive Main Education Enchancment Project’ describe, and any related research you behavior, put together an applicable work breakdown construction (WBS) itemising the principle consultancy work formula required to total all of the consultancy project work.
Level 0 is the title; on this case ‘Serbia Inclusive Main Education Enchancment Project’.
Level 1 contains the sub-sub-phases identified within the consumer’s Give an explanation for Offer Notion.

You should presumably well perhaps presumably very effectively be required to carry out a breakdown construction for this Subcomponent to no longer no longer up to stage 3 (i.e., to no longer no longer up to four ranges).
(20 Marks)

(b)The usage of indicative payment recordsdata current within the a host of reviews referring to the Serbia Inclusive Main Education Enchancment Project’, and any varied related recordsdata, in conjunction with that out of your acknowledge to Task 2 (a), estimate the delivered payment of the consultancy work, clearly explaining and justifying any assumptions you need to presumably well perhaps presumably honest beget realized it obligatory to produce.
(20 Marks)

(c)Take into story any contingencies that will seemingly be valuable and provide a clear suggestion to abet in firming the hiss costing.
(20 Marks)

Task 3: Ethics, compliance, and professionalism / Decent presentation

Presentation (speak material, style, professionalism, creativity, and concord).
(10 Marks)
Total: 100 marks.

MOD009379 ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

You need to silent fastidiously deem about the total recordsdata readily available within the market to you and, the set you feel it obligatory or applicable undertake extra research, (and/or produce assumptions about the circumstances or recordsdata you exercise), to total the assignment. You need to silent clearly inform, and account for, each assumption you produce.

UCL’s Department of Curriculum, Pedagogy and Review, (https://www.ucl.ac.uk/ioe/departments-and-centres/curriculum-pedagogy-and-evaluation)
UCL Consultants’, (https://www.ucl.ac.uk/consultants/work-ucl-consultants)
Serbia Inclusive Main Education Enchancment Project overview, (https://tasks.worldbank.org/en/tasks-operations/describe-insist/P181557?form=tasks).
Ministry of Education of the Republic of Serbia Offer, (https://prosveta.gov.rs/o-ministarstvu/,

Desk 1: ASSESMENT MARKING AND GRADING RUBRIC (Also look Desk 2)

The work will seemingly be assessed in an integrative formula as indicated within the marking rubric that is in step with Anglia Ruskin College generic evaluation standards and marking standards

GRADE à .

CRITERIA ↓

0 – 29:

No, or at handiest runt, proof of recordsdata. Of key disorders/ideas/ethics

, research abilities and academic / mental abilities. No, or at handiest, runt demonstration of expressive, Crew/ functional/ legitimate abilities.

030- 39:

Insufficient, proof of recordsdata. Of key disorders/ideas/ethics, research abilities and academic / mental abilities. Insufficient demonstration of expressive, Crew/ functional/ legitimate abilities.

40 – 49:

Restricted research abilities abate the usage of finding out resources and predicament-fixing.

Main problems with construction/accuracy in expression. The work is moderately descriptive. .

Crew/Functional/Profes sional abilities no longer yet stable. Restricted academic/ mental abilities. Restricted exercise of

scholarly conventions.:

50 – 59:

Sound recordsdata of key disorders/ideas/ ethics in the discipline. On occasion descriptive however has some capability to synthesize scholarship and argument. Minor lapses within the usage of scholarly conventions.

60 – 69:

Ultimate diagnosis-consistent exercise of scholarly conventions.: Ultimate Academic/ Expressive/ Decent abilities.:

70 – Seventy nine:

Unbelievable diagnosis-excessive stage of mental rigor and consistency.: Unbelievable Academic/ Expressive/ Decent abilities.

Demonstrates wonderful independence of idea and mental rigour.

80 – 89:

Famed diagnosis: work pushes the boundaries of the discipline and could presumably well perhaps honest be idea to be for external e-newsletter.:

Famed Academic

/Expressive

/legitimate abilities and creativity

90 – 100:

Distinctive diagnosis: work pushes the boundaries of the discipline and could presumably well perhaps honest be idea to be for external e-newsletter.:

Distinctive Academic/ Expressive/ legitimate abilities and creativity

Task 1 (a)

Trace a severe working out of project management instruments/ tactics/ systems, and so forth., (e.g., work breakdown construction), and their utility in managing tasks trusty thru the lifestyles cycle.

The job used to be no longer adopted, and there used to be runt to no proof of the evaluation standards having been met.

As an illustration, the pupil did no longer submit the coolest speak material or practically show an working out of the discipline.

There is runt to no exercise of applicable theories and fashions to seriously analyse the scenario.

There is runt to no recordsdata of key disorders / ideas of the discipline.

The job used to be adopted handiest to an insufficient stage and there used to be insufficient proof of the evaluation standards having been met.

As an illustration, the pupil demonstrated handiest insufficient or inferior recordsdata of the discipline.

There could be Insufficient exercise of applicable theories and fashions to seriously analyse the scenario and show applicable responses.

There could be insufficient proof of recordsdata of key disorders / ideas of the discipline.

The job used to be adopted to a restricted stage.

As an illustration, the pupil demonstrated handiest restricted working out of or research into the discipline set of residing thru several applicable sources.

There could be restricted exercise of applicable theories and fashions to seriously analyse the scenario and show applicable responses.

There could be restricted recordsdata of key disorders / ideas of the discipline. Work is descriptive however could presumably well perhaps very effectively be ready to checklist several related ideas.

The job used to be adopted to a sound stage.

As an illustration, the pupil demonstrated sound working out of or research into the discipline set of residing thru several applicable sources.

There could be sound exercise of applicable theories and fashions to seriously analyse the scenario and show applicable responses.

There could be sound recordsdata of key disorders / ideas of the discipline. Work is a runt of descriptive, however ready to proof working out of several related ideas.

Ultimate recordsdata of the instruments / tactics required to undertake the duty, with honest appropriate secondary research, into the discipline set of residing thru several applicable sources.

There could be honest appropriate exercise of applicable theories and fashions to seriously analyse the scenario and show applicable responses.

There could be honest appropriate recordsdata of key disorders / ideas of the discipline. Work applies diagnosis and review of scenario recordsdata (or recordsdata derived therefrom) and gifts determined and

applicable conclusions.

Unbelievable recordsdata of the instruments / tactics required to undertake the duty, with wonderful secondary research, into the discipline set of residing thru several applicable sources.

There could be an wonderful exercise of applicable theories and fashions to seriously analyse the scenario and show applicable responses.

There could be wonderful recordsdata of key disorders / ideas of the discipline. Work applies total diagnosis and review of scenario recordsdata and gifts determined and applicable conclusions.

Famed

recordsdata of the instruments

/ tactics required to undertake the duty with evident originality and autonomy of research abilities.

There could be an prominent exercise of applicable theories and fashions to seriously analyse the scenario and show applicable responses.

The work exceeds the taught discipline topic in many areas, demonstrating mental originality. Work is ready to analyse and review the scenario recordsdata, and creatively synthesise predictive hypotheses.

Distinctive recordsdata infamous of their discipline with extra special originality and autonomy.

There could be unprecedented exercise of applicable theories and fashions to seriously analyse the scenario and invent detailed solutions and suggest route(s) of action

The work very much exceeds the taught discipline topic, demonstrating mental originality. Work is ready to analyse and review the scenario recordsdata, and creatively synthesise predictive hypotheses, recognising anomalies.

30 Marks

0-8

9-11

12-14

15-17

18-20

21-33

24-26

27-30