Critique a research article from an even nursing professional journal

Criteria

Unprecedented Work

Meets Expectations

Needs Enchancment

No longer Acceptable

Total Points

Whine

Data

4 Points

-Follows all requirements for the task.

-Conveys neatly-rounded recordsdata of the arena.

-Excels in fully presenting what’s identified about the arena.

3 Points

-Follows all requirements for the task.

-Major functions of subject are mostly covered in the compulsory task areas.

1-2 Points

-Data of subject is in part covered.

-Key recordsdata is missing from 2 or more task areas.

0 Points

-Data of subject is similar outdated and doesn’t duvet your total required task areas.

Drift of Whine

4 Points

-Neat.

-Data flows in logical and partaking sequence.

-Straightforward to study, apply, and value right through.

-Captures the reader’s consideration.

3 Points

-Organized.

-Data flows in logical and partaking sequence.

-Straightforward to study, apply, and value through most of presentation.

1-2 Points

-Organization, sequence, and drift of presentation are refined to use at times.

-Data is refined to study or value in a few areas.

0 Points

-Paper is now no longer neatly organized.

-Data is refined to study, value, and apply right through many of the paper.

Clarity, Serious Thinking

4 Points

-Concisely explains the arena.

– Constantly analyzes recordsdata, provides insight, and attracts conclusions.

-Excels in presentation of tips.

-Scholarly work.

3 Points

-Explains the arena.

-Provides details about the arena.

-Some evaluation, insight, and conclusions equipped.

-Scholarly work.

1-2 Points

-Major facets of the arena are presented, however sing material lacks insight and evaluation.

0 Points

-Data is overall.

-Major facets of the arena are missing or insufficient.

-Lacks insight, evaluation, and conclusions.

-Reader gains exiguous working out of the arena.

Writing Composition

(Spelling, Grammar, Sentence Structure)

4 Points

-An occasional error can also happen, however writing, grammar, spelling, transitions, readability, and sentence constructing are basically error free.

3 Points

-Some minor errors (1-3 errors) can also happen with spelling, grammar, transitions, and sentence constructing however are now no longer consistent right through.

-Errors win now no longer interfere with the readability or comprehension of recordsdata.

1-2 Points

-Frequent errors (4-5 errors) happen with spelling, grammar, transitions, sentence constructing, and readability right through.

0 Points

-Various errors (>6 errors) happen with spelling, grammar, transitions, and sentence constructing, right through, which get it very refined to study and value the knowledge presented.

References

2 Points

-Data gathered from a diversity of nursing journals and nursing and/or scientific group net sites.

-Involves at the least two present references within the final 5 years.

1.5 Points

-Data gathered

from a diversity of connected

sources.

-Involves at the least two present references within the final 5 years.

1 Level

-Data gathered from a diversity of connected sources. (No longer all are professional sites).

-Provides now no longer now no longer as much as 2 references.

-References are bigger than 5 years dilapidated.

0 Points

-No longer all references are acceptable; now no longer from scholarly sources.

-Fewer than 2 references used.

APA Structure

2 Points

-An occasional error can also happen, however the paper is principally error-free, following APA format in the physique of the paper and reference page.

1.5 Points

-Some minor errors (1-3 errors) can also happen with APA format, however errors are now no longer consistent right through the paper.

1 Level

-Frequent errors (4-5 errors) happen with APA format right through the paper.

0 Points

-Various errors (>6 errors) happen with APA format continuously right through the paper, indicating that exiguous effort used to be positioned on working out the format guidelines.