TUTOR-MARKED ASSIGNMENT 01 (TMA01): Written Reflection This assignment is value 40% of the closing tag for NCO205 Consumer-Centred Make: Human Elements and Make Pondering. That is an particular person assignment. Please blueprint your assignment submission in Canvas. The submission decrease-off date is as follows: TG## Tutorial Groups TG01: 27 October 2025, 1200 hours (noon) TG02: 27 October 2025, 1200 hours (noon) TG03: 28 October 2025, 1200 hours (noon) TG04: 28 October 2025, 1200 hours (noon) TG05: 29 October 2025, 1200 hours (noon) TG06: 31 October 2025, 1200 hours (noon) TG07: 31 October 2025, 1200 hours (noon) TG08: 29 October 2025, 1200 hours (noon) TG09: 29 October 2025, 1200 hours (noon) TG10: 27 October 2025, 1200 hours (noon) TG11: 29 October 2025, 1200 hours (noon) TG12: 29 October 2025, 1200 hours (noon) TG13: 29 October 2025, 1200 hours (noon) T## Tutorial Groups T01: 27 October 2025, 1200 hours (noon) T02: 27 October 2025, 1200 hours (noon) T03: 28 October 2025, 1200 hours (noon) T04: 28 October 2025, 1200 hours (noon) T05: 30 October 2025, 1200 hours (noon) T06: 30 October 2025, 1200 hours (noon) T07: 31 October 2025, 1200 hours (noon) T08: 31 October 2025, 1200 hours (noon) T09: 01 November 2025, 1200 hours (noon) Write My Assignment Rent a Official Essay & Assignment Author for ending your Academic Assessments Native Singapore Writers Crew 100% Plagiarism-Free Essay Highest Satisfaction Price Free Revision On-Time Provide Notes to Students: The assignment contains 1 ask with 5 sub-questions. Your solution must attend to the word restrict of no bigger than 2000 words for the total assignment , with the exception of quotation and bibliography. Your solution beyond the word restrict could per chance now not be graded. You’ll want to per chance per chance append as a lot as 2 A4-sized pages of photographs (images, diagrams, and heaps others) to the cease of your submission. Your answers could per chance reference these photographs. Photos beyond this restrict could per chance now not be even handed as when grading. You’ll want to per chance per chance very smartly be to embody the next particulars on your submission: Course Code, Title of the TMA, SUSS PI No., Your Identify and Submission Date. You’ll want to per chance per chance very smartly be required to blueprint your submission by your tutorial community region in Canvas. Verify and review your submission. Identify your submission file strictly to this format with the corresponding filename extension: FullName_PI#_CourseCode_Semester_Tutorial-Community#_TMA As an instance, TanMeiMeiSally_A1234567_NCO205_Jul25_TG01_TMA You’ll want to per chance per chance very smartly be strongly inspired to put up your assignment sooner than the specified decrease-off date. Numerous submissions are allowed sooner than the specified decrease-off date. Most attention-grabbing essentially the most up-to-the-minute submission will likely be graded. There is precisely no extension of assignment decrease-off date. Ticket deduction draw for boring submission applies. Please consult with the Pupil Manual for more significant facets. Please consult with Discovering out Centre’s handy resource on Academic Integrity (https://upward push.suppose.com/fragment/i4wup4aZRMcXCL293kJqgBgfp3UmaQMl#/) for significant facets concerning plagiarism, collusion, copying, and accountable enlighten of generative AI instruments in assignments. The College has strict guidelines and will put into effect extreme penalties for impart and unacknowledged copying clearly materials or the work of every other authors, alongside side AI-generated work, as here’s regarded as dishonest. Please enlighten APA vogue for your in-text citations and your bibliography. Search for examples underneath: Instance of in-text quotation In 2019, Senator Elizabeth Warren arguing for the breaking up of Tremendous Tech acknowledged: “Nowadays’s astronomical tech companies beget too a lot energy — too a lot energy over our economic system, our society, and our democracy. They’ve bulldozed competition, prone our interior most data for earnings, and tilted the playing field in opposition to all people else. And within the process, they’ve smash minute businesses and stifled innovation.” (Warren, 2019)* Instance of reference within the bibliography *Warren, E. (2019, March 8). Here’s how we are in a position to ruin up Tremendous Tech. Medium. You’ll want to per chance per chance fetch more data on APA quotation vogue here: https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/ Please contact your tutor or the Course Chair whenever it’s seemingly you’ll beget gotten any doubts or want assistance. Seek data from 1 Seriously reflect on your GBA mission by answering sub-questions (a) to (e). Your answers will beget to now not be a chronological myth of what took space on your GBA mission or a summary of your GBA mission presentation. Your answers will beget to now not be about how your GBA community functioned as a group. Your answers will beget to specialise within the facets on your GBA mission that you felt went notably smartly and/or now not smartly, and thoughtfully camouflage why by drawing insightful connections to Human Elements and Make Pondering. (a) Describe what became done smartly within the Empathise section of your GBA mission and illustrate how it contributed to the mission’s person-centred invent outcome. Describe what became now not done smartly within the Empathise section of your GBA mission and how could per chance or now not it be improved. Present how Human Elements data and/or the outcome from other Make Pondering phases contributed to the Empathise section of your GBA mission. ( 20 marks ) (b) Describe what became done smartly within the Elaborate section of your GBA mission and illustrate how it contributed to the mission’s person-centred invent outcome. Describe what became now not done smartly within the Elaborate section of your GBA mission and how could per chance or now not it be improved. Present how Human Elements data and/or the outcome from other Make Pondering phases contributed to the Elaborate section of your GBA mission. ( 20 marks ) (c) Describe what became done smartly within the Ideate section of your GBA mission and illustrate how it contributed to the mission’s person-centred invent outcome. Describe what became now not done smartly within the Ideate section of your GBA mission and how could per chance or now not it be improved. Present how Human Elements data and/or the outcome from other Make Pondering phases contributed to the Ideate section of your GBA mission. ( 20 marks ) (d) Describe what became done smartly within the Prototype section of your GBA mission and illustrate how it contributed to the mission’s person-centred invent outcome. Describe what became now not done smartly within the Prototype section of your GBA mission and how could per chance or now not it be improved. Present how Human Elements data and/or the outcome from other Make Pondering phases contributed to the Prototype section of your GBA mission. ( 20 marks ) (e) Describe what became done smartly within the Test section of your GBA mission and illustrate how it contributed to the mission’s person-centred invent outcome. Describe what became now not done smartly within the Test section of your GBA mission and how could per chance or now not it be improved. Present how Human Elements data and/or the outcome from other Make Pondering phases contributed to the Test section of your GBA mission. ( 20 marks ) Aquire Customized Resolution of This Overview & Elevate Your Grades Derive A Free Quote Grading Rubrics Requirements Demonstrates mastery Demonstrates competence Demonstrates abilities in fashion Reveals areas searching progress Lacking main parts Empathise (max. 20 marks) Described what went smartly and what did now not sail smartly within the Empathise section of the mission. Illustrated with insightful elaboration how the above contributed to the mission’s outcome and could per chance be improved. Insightful clarification about non-evident connections to other Make Pondering phases and/or Human Elements data. Described what went smartly and what did now not sail smartly within the Empathise section of the mission. Ample illustration with detailed elaboration of how the above contributed to the mission’s outcome and could per chance be improved. Ample clarification with detailed elaboration about connections to other Make Pondering phases and/or Human Elements data Described what went smartly and what did now not sail smartly within the Empathise section of the mission. Some insufficient illustration of how the above contributed to the mission’s outcome and could per chance be improved due to lack of significant facets. Some insufficient clarification about connections to other Make Pondering phases and/or Human Elements data due to lack of significant facets. Mentioned what went smartly and/or what did now not sail smartly within the Empathise section of the mission. Mostly inappropriate illustration of how the above contributed to the mission’s outcome and/or is susceptible to be improved. Mostly inappropriate clarification about connections to other Make Pondering phases and/or Human Elements data. Did now not bid and/or illustrate the Empathise section of the mission. (17%-20%) (13%-16%) (9%-12%) (5% – 8%) (0% – 4%) Elaborate (max. 20 marks) Described what went smartly and what did now not sail smartly within the Elaborate section of the mission. Illustrated with insightful elaboration how the above contributed to the mission’s outcome and could per chance be improved. Insightful clarification about non-evident connections to other Make Pondering phases and/or Human Elements data. Described what went smartly and what did now not sail smartly within the Elaborate section of the mission. Ample illustration with detailed elaboration of how the above contributed to the mission’s outcome and could per chance be improved. Ample clarification with detailed elaboration about connections to other Make Pondering phases and/or Human Elements data Described what went smartly and what did now not sail smartly within the Elaborate section of the mission. Some insufficient illustration of how the above contributed to the mission’s outcome and could per chance be improved due to lack of significant facets. Some insufficient clarification about connections to other Make Pondering phases and/or Human Elements data due to lack of significant facets. Mentioned what went smartly and/or what did now not sail smartly within the Elaborate section of the mission. Mostly inappropriate illustration of how the above contributed to the mission’s outcome and/or is susceptible to be improved. Mostly inappropriate clarification about connections to other Make Pondering phases and/or Human Elements data. Did now not bid and/or illustrate the Elaborate section of the mission. (17%-20%) (13%-16%) (9%-12%) (5% – 8%) (0% – 4%) Ideate (max. 20 marks) Described what went smartly and what did now not sail smartly within the Ideate section of the mission. Illustrated with insightful elaboration how the above contributed to the mission’s Described what went smartly and what did now not sail smartly within the Ideate section of the mission. Ample illustration with detailed elaboration of how the above contributed to the Described what went smartly and what did now not sail smartly within the Ideate section of the mission. Some insufficient illustration of how the above contributed to the mission’s outcome and could per chance be Mentioned what went smartly and/or what did now not sail smartly within the Ideate section of the mission. Mostly inappropriate illustration of how the above contributed to the mission’s outcome Did now not bid and/or illustrate the Ideate section of the mission. outcome and could per chance be improved. Insightful clarification about non-evident connections to other Make Pondering phases and/or Human Elements data. mission’s outcome and could per chance be improved. Ample clarification with detailed elaboration about connections to other Make Pondering phases and/or Human Elements data improved due to lack of significant facets. Some insufficient clarification about connections to other Make Pondering phases and/or Human Elements data due to lack of significant facets. and/or is susceptible to be improved. Mostly inappropriate clarification about connections to other Make Pondering phases and/or Human Elements data. (17%-20%) (13%-16%) (9%-12%) (5% – 8%) (0% – 4%) Prototype (max. 20 marks) Described what went smartly and what did now not sail smartly within the Prototype section of the mission. Illustrated with insightful elaboration how the above contributed to the mission’s outcome and could per chance be improved. Insightful clarification about non-evident connections to other Make Pondering phases and/or Human Elements data. Described what went smartly and what did now not sail smartly within the Prototype section of the mission. Ample illustration with detailed elaboration of how the above contributed to the mission’s outcome and could per chance be improved. Ample clarification with detailed elaboration about connections to other Make Pondering phases and/or Human Elements data Described what went smartly and what did now not sail smartly within the Prototype section of the mission. Some insufficient illustration of how the above contributed to the mission’s outcome and could per chance be improved due to lack of significant facets. Some insufficient clarification about connections to other Make Pondering phases and/or Human Elements data due to lack of significant facets. Mentioned what went smartly and/or what did now not sail smartly within the Prototype section of the mission. Mostly inappropriate illustration of how the above contributed to the mission’s outcome and/or is susceptible to be improved. Mostly inappropriate clarification about connections to other Make Pondering phases and/or Human Elements data. Did now not bid and/or illustrate the Prototype section of the mission. (17%-20%) (13%-16%) (9%-12%) (5% – 8%) (0% – 4%) Test (max. 20 marks) Described what went smartly and what did now not sail smartly within the Test section of the mission. Illustrated with insightful elaboration how the above contributed to the mission’s outcome and could per chance be improved. Insightful clarification about non-evident connections to other Make Pondering phases and/or Human Elements data. Described what went smartly and what did now not sail smartly within the Test section of the mission. Ample illustration with detailed elaboration of how the above contributed to the mission’s outcome and could per chance be improved. Ample clarification with detailed elaboration about connections to other Make Pondering phases and/or Human Elements data Described what went smartly and what did now not sail smartly within the Test section of the mission. Some insufficient illustration of how the above contributed to the mission’s outcome and could per chance be improved due to lack of significant facets. Some insufficient clarification about connections to other Make Pondering phases and/or Human Elements data due to lack of significant facets. Mentioned what went smartly and/or what did now not sail smartly within the Test section of the mission. Mostly inappropriate illustration of how the above contributed to the mission’s outcome and/or is susceptible to be improved. Mostly inappropriate clarification about connections to other Make Pondering phases and/or Human Elements data. Did now not bid and/or illustrate the Test section of the mission. (17%-20%) (13%-16%) (9%-12%) (5% – 8%) (0% – 4%) Caught with diverse homework assignments and feeling wired ? Rob expert academic assistance & Derive 100% Plagiarism free papers Derive A Free Quote
- WE OFFER THE BEST CUSTOM PAPER WRITING SERVICES. WE HAVE DONE THIS QUESTION BEFORE, WE CAN ALSO DO IT FOR YOU.
- Assignment status: Already Solved By Our Experts
- (USA, AUS, UK & CA PhD. Writers)
- CLICK HERE TO GET A PROFESSIONAL WRITER TO WORK ON THIS PAPER AND OTHER SIMILAR PAPERS, GET A NON PLAGIARIZED PAPER FROM OUR EXPERTS
QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPER – NO ChatGPT.NO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER
Looking for unparalleled custom paper writing services? Our team of experienced professionals at AcademicWritersBay.com is here to provide you with top-notch assistance that caters to your unique needs.
We understand the importance of producing original, high-quality papers that reflect your personal voice and meet the rigorous standards of academia. That’s why we assure you that our work is completely plagiarism-free—we craft bespoke solutions tailored exclusively for you.
Why Choose AcademicWritersBay.com?
- Our papers are 100% original, custom-written from scratch.
- We’re here to support you around the clock, any day of the year.
- You’ll find our prices competitive and reasonable.
- We handle papers across all subjects, regardless of urgency or difficulty.
- Need a paper urgently? We can deliver within 6 hours!
- Relax with our on-time delivery commitment.
- We offer money-back and privacy guarantees to ensure your satisfaction and confidentiality.
- Benefit from unlimited amendments upon request to get the paper you envisioned.
- We pledge our dedication to meeting your expectations and achieving the grade you deserve.
Our Process: Getting started with us is as simple as can be. Here’s how to do it:
- Click on the “Place Your Order” tab at the top or the “Order Now” button at the bottom. You’ll be directed to our order form.
- Provide the specifics of your paper in the “PAPER DETAILS” section.
- Select your academic level, the deadline, and the required number of pages.
- Click on “CREATE ACCOUNT & SIGN IN” to provide your registration details, then “PROCEED TO CHECKOUT.”
- Follow the simple payment instructions and soon, our writers will be hard at work on your paper.
AcademicWritersBay.com is dedicated to expediting the writing process without compromising on quality. Our roster of writers boasts individuals with advanced degrees—Masters and PhDs—in a myriad of disciplines, ensuring that no matter the complexity or field of your assignment, we have the expertise to tackle it with finesse. Our quick turnover doesn’t mean rushed work; it means efficiency and priority handling, ensuring your deadlines are met with the excellence your academics demand.
