Evaluate 2 Evaluate title Written – Research File Aligned enviornment discovering out outcomes • Demonstrate and critique experimental research methods • Show disguise skills in properly deciding on and conducting facts analyses, contained in the context of experimental research • Clarify facts and talk findings properly to the duty and audience, contained in the context of experimental research Aligned expert requirements/ competencies Australian Psychology Accreditation Council Accreditation Standards Psychology Board of Australia Standards and Guidelines Weighting and due date 40% Due: Wed, 12 Nov (Week 8), 11:59pm Particular person or Neighborhood Particular person Phrase or deadline 2000 phrases +/- 10% (rather than reference list and appendices) Requirements for successful completion of this overview item In expose to pass the research file, a impress of 50% or higher is required. Generative AI use Generative AI tools can’t be dilapidated on this overview task On this overview, it is advisable no longer use Generative Man made Intelligence (GenAI) for any parts of the overview task including the generation of any supplies or swear in terms of the overview item. Write My Project Rent a Skilled Essay & Project Author for ending your Academic Assessments Native Singapore Writers Team 100% Plagiarism-Free Essay Highest Pleasure Rate Free Revision On-Time Provide Evaluate 2: Description One of essentially the most indispensable targets of this enviornment is so that you can have the option to seem at long-established facts to the make and prognosis of experiments. That you will more than seemingly be supplied with a description of a peek and a corresponding dataset. Using the skills that you learn at some level of the trimester you are going to should analyse the dataset and write up a research file as if for e-newsletter in a scientific journal. Your file should accumulate the full linked sections, as goal out in the APA e-newsletter manual: Title, Summary, Introduction, Recommendations, Outcomes, Discussion, and References. The file should mute be 2000 phrases +/- 10% (rather than the reference list and appendices). The analyses that you are going to should murder in expose to analyse that dataset will seemingly be lined in the prognosis centered tutorials. Earlier tutorials will duvet issues with experimental make, which will also allow you to when writing your assignment. Thus, to address for this overview, you need to mute again lectures and tutorials and complete the obligatory reading and activities. Specific facts concerning formatting and swear requirements, along with facts concerning the peek and a dataset, will seemingly be supplied in LearnJCU (in the Evaluate home). That you can put up your written research file by the utilization of LearnJCU. Only Phrase or PDF documents will seemingly be licensed. Evaluate 2: Rubric Criteria Unsatisfactory (N; 0-49) Sufficient (P; 50-64) Sound (C to mid-range D; 65-Seventy nine) Outstanding (Larger-range D to HD; 80-100) Title page (5 marks) The title is unsuitable, unclear, and/or irrelevant. APA formatting is unsuitable and/or entails foremost errors. In vogue title with minor errors in APA formatting. Fair, sufficiently-detailed title with only a number of minor errors in APA formatting. Informative, lawful, concise title and formatted precisely in APA vogue. Summary (10 marks) The abstract is lacking, incomplete, severely misrepresents the peek and its findings, or too lengthy. The abstract entails a protracted-established summary, but it unquestionably could very effectively be unclear, consist of much less linked facts, or be inside +10% of the notice limit. The abstract presents an lawful summary of the linked facts contained in the notice limit. The abstract presents a effectively-written, lawful, concise summary of essentially the most indispensable facts contained in the notice limit. Introduction (15 marks) The introduction doesn’t introduce the topic below investigation (peek), and/or the hypotheses are lacking or illogical. The introduction presents a protracted-established context for the peek but toughen from the literature is wanted. The introduction states hypotheses that can no longer be entirely developed. The introduction presents an life like context for the peek by citing linked theoretical/ empirical enviornment topic. The introduction articulates positive, logical hypotheses. The introduction clearly presents a effectively-developed context for the peek by citing discerning theoretical/ empirical enviornment topic and articulates positive, logical, and effectively-written hypotheses. Procedure (20 marks) Insufficient description of the vogue, comprising unsuitable, unclear, or incomplete facts. A superficial description of the vogue is incorporated, comprising essentially lawful facts. A effectively-developed articulation of the vogue comprising lawful facts, which are supplied clearly. An splendid articulation of the vogue comprising linked and lawful manner facts in a transparent and concise manner. The extent of detail permits replication. Outcomes (20 marks) Inadequate or unsuitable reporting of the effects. Mostly lawful reporting of the suitable descriptive statistics and statistical checking out (including assumptions checking out). Fair reporting of the suitable descriptive statistics and statistical checking out (including assumptions checking out). Full and lawful reporting of the suitable descriptive statistics and statistical checking out (including assumptions checking out). An incorporated figure precisely items the effects and is formatted precisely. Discussion (15 marks) The dialogue contextualises the ends up in a partial, vague, or unsuitable manner. The dialogue explains the constraints, implications, solutions for future research in a partial, vague, or unsuitable manner, and/or states ambiguous, illogical, or unsupported conclusions. Ample examination of the ends up in terms of the hypotheses and outdated literature/theories incorporated in the Introduction. The dialogue outlines largely linked limitations and implications of the research findings, presents solutions for future research, and arrives at a licensed conclusion. Serious examination of the ends up in terms of the hypotheses and outdated literature/theories incorporated in the Introduction. The dialogue outlines linked limitations and implications of the research findings. Proficient and fundamental examination of the ends up in terms of the hypotheses and outdated literature/theories incorporated in the Introduction. The dialogue outlines indispensable limitations and implications of the research findings, and presents solutions for future research, and arrives at a effectively-reasoned and positive conclusion. Criteria Unsatisfactory (N; 0-49) Sufficient (P; 50-64) Sound (C to mid-range D; 65-Seventy nine) Outstanding (Larger-range D to HD; 80-100) APA referencing (5 marks) Cites sources in-text and compiles the reference list with many errors or in a approach that is no longer in conserving with APA7 vogue. Cites no longer no longer as a lot as 3 sources in-text and complies the reference list APA7 vogue (with some errors). Accurately cites sources in-text and compiles the reference list in APA7 vogue (with only a number of minor errors). Expertly cites sources in-text and complies the reference list in APA7 vogue (with subsequent-to-no errors). Appendix (5 marks) The linked desk(s) accumulate no longer been incorporated. The linked desk(s) are incorporated alongside pointless output. The linked desk(s) are incorporated (and nothing else). The linked desk(s) are incorporated (and nothing else). APA formatting vogue (5 marks) The formatting of the file is inconsistent with APA7 vogue. The basic building of the file is lawful, but moderately a number of APA7 formatting errors are modern. The file is formatted in APA7 vogue with only a number of minor errors. The file is formatted in APA7 vogue with no errors. Aquire Customized Reply of This Evaluate & Elevate Your Grades To find A Free Quote Evaluate Overview This document outlines the peek which you are going to be analysing and writing up as fragment of your research file assignment. It also covers the sections which you are going to should consist of on your research file. For submission due dates, facts about applying for extensions, and the marking rubric please scheme the Evaluate Overview document. Peek Background “Fitspiration” is an online vogue wherein social media customers put up weight loss program- and notify-linked pictures, ostensibly to motivate followers to pursue a healthy standard of living. For instance, a fitspiration put up could feature an athlete exercisingalongside a motivational quote equivalent to “No effort, no blueprint.” Alternatively, fitspiration swear on the full emphasises appearance, most often presenting sexualised pictures of unrealistically honest people (Alberga et al., 2018). This has raised issues about its likely affect on viewers’ body image. In a single peek, Tiggemann and Zaccardo (2015) randomly assigned feminine undergraduate students to scheme either Instagram fitspiration pictures or management pictures (travelrelated Instagram posts). Of us who considered fitspiration pictures reported higher body dissatisfaction. Identical findings accumulate been reported in other research of younger ladies (Prichard et al., 2018; Rounds & Stutts, 2021). Contemporary Peek You are fragment of a research team aiming to elongate this work in numerous ways. First, Tiggemann and Zaccardo (2015) show that their two-community make made it advanced to understand which a part of the fitspiration image (the model or the inspirational quote) affect body dissatisfaction. To deal with this, your team has incorporated three experimental conditions: fitspiration pictures with text, fitspiration pictures with out text, and management (drag) pictures. Second, your team desires to understand if a same invent could be observed among males. Thus, your peek has sampled each female and male participants. Third, Vendemia and DeAndrea (2018) found that participants who reveal that Instagram pictures are continuously modified (e.g., by Photoshop or beauty filters) file much less body dissatisfaction following exposure to such pictures. Accordingly, your team is also to understand whether or no longer highlighting the utilization of photograph bettering could alternate the invent on fitspiration pictures on body image dissatisfaction. Your job is to behavior a factorial ANOVA to evaluate the invent of image form and one other IV (gender OR image bettering warning) on body dissatisfaction. You have to mute accumulate no longer no longer as a lot as one hypothesis per IV. You are no longer required to carry out any extra analyses beyond the factorial ANOVA (out of doors of manufacturing descriptive statistics and assumption checking out).1 You also will more than seemingly be required to resolve what more or much less sample dimension could be wanted to accumulate adequate vitality to bustle this peek. Tiggemann and Zaccardo (2015) found their image manipulation to accumulate a medium-to-spacious invent on body satisfaction. You are told to err on the facet of caution and thought for a medium-sized invent.[1] Footnotes. 1 If an assumption has been violated you is seemingly to be only expected to indicate the violation on your write-up. You are no longer expected to murder any longer or much less facts transformation to address assumption violations. Methodological Recordsdata Recordsdata on how the peek variables were measured is summarised below. Variable: Measured By: Body satisfaction Rounds and Stutts (2021) and Slater et al.’s (2017) contrivance to measuring body satisfaction by the utilization of three visible analogue scales change into as soon as dilapidated. The three objects were: • I’m tickled with my weight • I’m tickled with my total appearance • I’m tickled with my body shape Every item had a response range of 0 (below no circumstances) to 100 (extremely) Ratings on each item were averaged to create an total body satisfaction rating (the build higher ratings show more body satisfaction) Image-form manipulation People were randomly assigned to one in every of three experimental conditions: • Fitspiration pictures with text • Fitspiration pictures with out text • Reduction a watch on condition All stimulus pictures were sourced from public Instagram profiles. Following Tiggemann and Zaccardo (2015), the fitspiration pictures were sourced from pictures tagged with #fitspiration. Reduction a watch on pictures were taken from pictures tagged with #drag. Fitspiration pictures with text: 20 pictures depicting females and 20 pictures depicting males were chosen. All pictures incorporated an inspiration quote. Fitspiration pictures with out text: The same 40 pictures dilapidated in the first condition were supplied, but the inspirational quotes were digitally removed the utilization of Photoshop. Reduction a watch on pictures: 40 drag pictures were chosen. Within each experimental condition, the expose wherein pictures were supplied change into as soon as randomised. Photos were displayed on display one after the other. Every image change into as soon as displayed for 10 seconds. Image bettering warning manipulation People were randomly assigned to either receive a photograph-bettering warning prior to viewing the pictures (“Please show that many Instagram pictures are digitally enhanced, as an illustration by Photoshop or beauty filters”) or to receive no warning. Gender Single quiz: “With which gender carry out you set?” Male; Female; Non-Binary; A vogue of Age Measured in years Nationality Single quiz: “In what nation carry out you presently stay?” Australia; Singapore; A vogue of Occupational Standing Single quiz: “Which of the following simplest describes your occupation?” Student; College workers member; A vogue of (please write in) The JCU Human Research Ethics Committee granted approval to behavior the peek. People were recruited by adverts on bulletin boards on the Australian and Singapore campuses of JCU, the SONA pool of psychology pupil participants, and an email despatched to varsity workers. The peek change into as soon as bustle online the utilization of the computer scheme Qualtrics. This video presents an elaborate of how randomisation to teams could also be performed in Qualtrics. You carry out no longer should know the fine facts of this process, but it unquestionably could aid how random assignment is utilized in Qualtrics. The expose wherein peek parts were supplied is as follows: Recordsdata sheet (which indicated that participation could very effectively be requested about their body image) Told consent questions Image bettering warning supplied (if appropriate condition) Stimulus pictures supplied Body image measure and demographic questions (including gender) Debrief wherein participants were thanked (participants were supplied with facts on counselling companies should mute they feel distressed by the peek). In alternate for his or her participation, participants were entered into the blueprint to rep a $50 reward card to a campus café. Student participants also purchased SONA participation credit. References Alberga, A. S., Withnell, S. J., & von Ranson, K. M. (2018). Fitspiration and thinspiration: A comparability across three social networking websites. Journal of Drinking Issues, 6(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-018-0227-x Prichard, I., McLachlan, A. C., Lavis, T., & Tiggemann, M. (2018). The affect of various forms of #fitspiration imagery on body image, mood, and self-objectification among younger ladies. Sex Roles, 78(11), 789-798. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0830-3 Rounds, E. G., & Stutts, L. A. (2021). The affect of fitspiration swear on body satisfaction and damaging mood: An experimental peek. Psychology of In vogue Media, 10(2), 267-274. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000288 Slater, A., Varsani, N., & Diedrichs, P. C. (2017). #fitspo or #loveyourself? The affect of fitspiration and self-compassion Instagram pictures on ladies’s body image, self-compassion, and mood. Body Image, 22, 87-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2017.06.004 Tiggemann, M., & Zaccardo, M. (2015). “Relate to be match, no longer skinny”: The invent of fitspiration imagery on ladies’s body image. Body Image, 15, 61-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2015.06.003 Vendemia, M. A., & DeAndrea, D. C. (2018). The outcomes of viewing thin, sexualized selfies on Instagram: Investigating the goal of image supply and awareness of photograph bettering practices. Body Image, 27, 118-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2018.08.013 [1] Your peek could, or could no longer, accumulate reached this deliberate sample dimension. Caught with moderately a number of homework assignments and feeling wired ? Protect close expert tutorial assistance & To find 100% Plagiarism free papers To find A Free Quote
- WE OFFER THE BEST CUSTOM PAPER WRITING SERVICES. WE HAVE DONE THIS QUESTION BEFORE, WE CAN ALSO DO IT FOR YOU.
- Assignment status: Already Solved By Our Experts
- (USA, AUS, UK & CA PhD. Writers)
- CLICK HERE TO GET A PROFESSIONAL WRITER TO WORK ON THIS PAPER AND OTHER SIMILAR PAPERS, GET A NON PLAGIARIZED PAPER FROM OUR EXPERTS
QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPER – NO ChatGPT.NO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER
Looking for unparalleled custom paper writing services? Our team of experienced professionals at AcademicWritersBay.com is here to provide you with top-notch assistance that caters to your unique needs.
We understand the importance of producing original, high-quality papers that reflect your personal voice and meet the rigorous standards of academia. That’s why we assure you that our work is completely plagiarism-free—we craft bespoke solutions tailored exclusively for you.
Why Choose AcademicWritersBay.com?
- Our papers are 100% original, custom-written from scratch.
- We’re here to support you around the clock, any day of the year.
- You’ll find our prices competitive and reasonable.
- We handle papers across all subjects, regardless of urgency or difficulty.
- Need a paper urgently? We can deliver within 6 hours!
- Relax with our on-time delivery commitment.
- We offer money-back and privacy guarantees to ensure your satisfaction and confidentiality.
- Benefit from unlimited amendments upon request to get the paper you envisioned.
- We pledge our dedication to meeting your expectations and achieving the grade you deserve.
Our Process: Getting started with us is as simple as can be. Here’s how to do it:
- Click on the “Place Your Order” tab at the top or the “Order Now” button at the bottom. You’ll be directed to our order form.
- Provide the specifics of your paper in the “PAPER DETAILS” section.
- Select your academic level, the deadline, and the required number of pages.
- Click on “CREATE ACCOUNT & SIGN IN” to provide your registration details, then “PROCEED TO CHECKOUT.”
- Follow the simple payment instructions and soon, our writers will be hard at work on your paper.
AcademicWritersBay.com is dedicated to expediting the writing process without compromising on quality. Our roster of writers boasts individuals with advanced degrees—Masters and PhDs—in a myriad of disciplines, ensuring that no matter the complexity or field of your assignment, we have the expertise to tackle it with finesse. Our quick turnover doesn’t mean rushed work; it means efficiency and priority handling, ensuring your deadlines are met with the excellence your academics demand.
