Evaluate 2 Evaluate title Written – Research Document Aligned self-discipline studying outcomes • Demonstrate and critique experimental research strategies • Gift talents in because it will doubtless be deciding on and conducting data analyses, within the context of experimental research • Elaborate data and keep up a correspondence findings because it will doubtless be to the assignment and viewers, within the context of experimental research Aligned expert standards/ competencies Australian Psychology Accreditation Council Accreditation Requirements Psychology Board of Australia Requirements and Pointers Weighting and due date 40% Due: Wed, 12 Nov (Week 8), 11:59pm Particular person or Crew Particular person Discover or closing date 2000 phrases +/- 10% (other than reference listing and appendices) Requirements for a hit completion of this evaluation merchandise In show to circulation the research picture, a tag of 50% or elevated is required. Generative AI use Generative AI instruments can not be ragged in this evaluation assignment In this evaluation, you absorb to no longer use Generative Synthetic Intelligence (GenAI) for any ingredients of the evaluation assignment including the generation of any supplies or swear regarding the evaluation merchandise. Write My Assignment Rent a Knowledgeable Essay & Assignment Author for completing your Academic Assessments Native Singapore Writers Crew 100% Plagiarism-Free Essay Absolute most sensible Satisfaction Rate Free Revision On-Time Transport Evaluate 2: Description One of the most principle objectives of this self-discipline is for you so as to educate common data to the hold and diagnosis of experiments. You’re going to be supplied with a top level realizing of a detect and a corresponding dataset. Utilizing the abilities that you just be taught all the design thru the trimester you would possibly presumably per chance resolve on to analyse the dataset and write up a research picture as if for publication in a scientific journal. Your picture must have the total relevant sections, as web page out within the APA publication manual: Title, Abstract, Introduction, Programs, Outcomes, Discussion, and References. The picture needs to be 2000 phrases +/- 10% (other than the reference listing and appendices). The analyses that you just will must carry out in show to analyse that dataset will doubtless be lined within the diagnosis focused tutorials. Earlier tutorials will duvet problems with experimental hold, which also can allow you to when writing your assignment. Thus, to web page up for this evaluation, you might want to quiet attend lectures and tutorials and full the crucial studying and actions. Explicit data regarding formatting and swear requirements, as successfully as data about the detect and a dataset, will doubtless be supplied in LearnJCU (within the Evaluate residence). You’ll publish your written research picture thru LearnJCU. Finest Discover or PDF documents will doubtless be approved. Evaluate 2: Rubric Criteria Unsatisfactory (N; 0-49) Sufficient (P; 50-64) Sound (C to mid-vary D; 65-seventy nine) Prominent (Upper-vary D to HD; 80-100) Title web page (5 marks) The title is incorrect, unclear, and/or irrelevant. APA formatting is incorrect and/or involves main errors. Classic title with minor errors in APA formatting. Correct, sufficiently-detailed title with simplest a number of minor errors in APA formatting. Informative, lawful, concise title and formatted precisely in APA vogue. Abstract (10 marks) The abstract is missing, incomplete, seriously misrepresents the detect and its findings, or too lengthy. The abstract involves a common abstract, however it would possibly per chance per chance presumably per chance per chance be unclear, consist of much less relevant data, or be within +10% of the observe restrict. The abstract offers an lawful abstract of the relevant data within the observe restrict. The abstract offers a successfully-written, lawful, concise abstract of the principle data within the observe restrict. Introduction (15 marks) The introduction does no longer introduce the self-discipline under investigation (detect), and/or the hypotheses are missing or illogical. The introduction offers a common context for the detect however beef up from the literature is important. The introduction states hypotheses that would possibly presumably per chance per chance no longer be fully developed. The introduction offers an cheap context for the detect by citing relevant theoretical/ empirical fabric. The introduction articulates clear, logical hypotheses. The introduction clearly offers a successfully-developed context for the detect by citing discerning theoretical/ empirical fabric and articulates clear, logical, and successfully-written hypotheses. Manner (20 marks) Insufficient description of the skill, comprising incorrect, unclear, or incomplete details. A superficial description of the skill is integrated, comprising mainly lawful data. A successfully-developed articulation of the skill comprising lawful details, that are introduced clearly. An pleasing articulation of the skill comprising relevant and lawful skill details in a transparent and concise formulation. The stage of component permits replication. Outcomes (20 marks) Insufficient or unsuitable reporting of the outcomes. Basically lawful reporting of the actual descriptive statistics and statistical sorting out (including assumptions sorting out). Correct reporting of the actual descriptive statistics and statistical sorting out (including assumptions sorting out). Full and lawful reporting of the actual descriptive statistics and statistical sorting out (including assumptions sorting out). An integrated resolve precisely provides the outcomes and is formatted precisely. Discussion (15 marks) The discussion contextualises the outcomes in a partial, obscure, or incorrect formulation. The discussion explains the obstacles, implications, strategies for future research in a partial, obscure, or incorrect formulation, and/or states ambiguous, illogical, or unsupported conclusions. Ample examination of the outcomes regarding the hypotheses and earlier literature/theories integrated within the Introduction. The discussion outlines largely relevant obstacles and implications of the research findings, offers strategies for future research, and arrives at a common conclusion. Well-known examination of the outcomes regarding the hypotheses and earlier literature/theories integrated within the Introduction. The discussion outlines relevant obstacles and implications of the research findings. Proficient and tense examination of the outcomes regarding the hypotheses and earlier literature/theories integrated within the Introduction. The discussion outlines crucial obstacles and implications of the research findings, and offers strategies for future research, and arrives at a successfully-reasoned and clear conclusion. Criteria Unsatisfactory (N; 0-49) Sufficient (P; 50-64) Sound (C to mid-vary D; 65-seventy nine) Prominent (Upper-vary D to HD; 80-100) APA referencing (5 marks) Cites sources in-textual swear and compiles the reference listing with many errors or in a skill that’s no longer in step with APA7 vogue. Cites as a minimal 3 sources in-textual swear and complies the reference listing APA7 vogue (with some errors). Accurately cites sources in-textual swear and compiles the reference listing in APA7 vogue (with simplest a number of minor errors). Expertly cites sources in-textual swear and complies the reference listing in APA7 vogue (with next-to-no errors). Appendix (5 marks) The relevant desk(s) absorb no longer been integrated. The relevant desk(s) are integrated alongside pointless output. The relevant desk(s) are integrated (and nothing else). The relevant desk(s) are integrated (and nothing else). APA formatting vogue (5 marks) The formatting of the picture is inconsistent with APA7 vogue. The basic structure of the picture is lawful, however a different of APA7 formatting errors are recent. The picture is formatted in APA7 vogue with simplest a number of minor errors. The picture is formatted in APA7 vogue with no errors. Buy Custom-made Acknowledge of This Evaluate & Elevate Your Grades Ranking A Free Quote Evaluate Overview This doc outlines the detect which you would possibly presumably per chance per chance presumably be analysing and writing up as phase of your research picture assignment. It also covers the sections which you would possibly presumably per chance per chance presumably must consist of on your research picture. For submission due dates, details about making use of for extensions, and the marking rubric please ogle the Evaluate Overview doc. Peek Background “Fitspiration” is a web pattern all the design thru which social media users publish diet- and declare-linked photos, ostensibly to motivate followers to pursue a healthy standard of living. As an instance, a fitspiration publish would possibly presumably per chance per chance feature an athlete exercisingalongside a motivational quote resembling “No anguish, no invent.” Alternatively, fitspiration swear customarily emphasises look, frequently presenting sexualised photos of unrealistically gorgeous contributors (Alberga et al., 2018). This has raised concerns about its seemingly impact on viewers’ body image. In a single detect, Tiggemann and Zaccardo (2015) randomly assigned female undergraduate students to realizing both Instagram fitspiration photos or administration photos (travelrelated Instagram posts). These that considered fitspiration photos reported elevated body dissatisfaction. Equivalent findings had been reported in different experiences of young females (Prichard et al., 2018; Rounds & Stutts, 2021). Fresh Peek You are phase of a research team aiming to develop this work in so much of strategies. First, Tiggemann and Zaccardo (2015) show that their two-neighborhood hold made it complicated to know which ingredient of the fitspiration image (the mannequin or the inspirational quote) impact body dissatisfaction. To take care of this, your team has integrated three experimental prerequisites: fitspiration photos with textual swear, fitspiration photos without textual swear, and administration (plod) photos. 2nd, your team needs to know if a identical cease would be observed among males. Thus, your detect has sampled every male and female individuals. Third, Vendemia and DeAndrea (2018) chanced on that individuals who factor in that Instagram photos are frequently modified (e.g., thru Photoshop or magnificence filters) picture much less body dissatisfaction following publicity to such photos. Accordingly, your team shall be fervent to know whether or no longer highlighting the use of photo enhancing would possibly presumably per chance per chance trade the cease on fitspiration photos on body image dissatisfaction. Your job is to habits a factorial ANOVA to assess the cease of image kind and one different IV (gender OR image enhancing warning) on body dissatisfaction. You need to absorb as a minimal one hypothesis per IV. You are no longer required to cease any extra analyses past the factorial ANOVA (launch air of generating descriptive statistics and assumption sorting out).1 You’ll even be required to resolve what form of sample size would be important to absorb ample energy to bustle this detect. Tiggemann and Zaccardo (2015) chanced on their image manipulation to absorb a medium-to-huge cease on body satisfaction. You are told to err on the facet of caution and notion for a medium-sized cease.[1] Footnotes. 1 If an assumption has been violated you are simplest anticipated to expose the violation on your write-up. You are no longer anticipated to carry out any form of recordsdata transformation to take care of assumption violations. Methodological Files Files on how the detect variables had been measured is summarised below. Variable: Measured By: Body satisfaction Rounds and Stutts (2021) and Slater et al.’s (2017) skill to measuring body satisfaction thru three visual analogue scales changed into once ragged. The three objects had been: • I’m gratified with my weight • I’m gratified with my total look • I’m gratified with my body shape Every merchandise had a response vary of 0 (in no design) to 100 (extremely) Scores on every merchandise had been averaged to carry out an total body satisfaction ranking (where elevated scores show extra body satisfaction) Image-kind manipulation Members had been randomly assigned to without a doubt one of three experimental prerequisites: • Fitspiration photos with textual swear • Fitspiration photos without textual swear • Control condition All stimulus photos had been sourced from public Instagram profiles. Following Tiggemann and Zaccardo (2015), the fitspiration photos had been sourced from photos tagged with #fitspiration. Control photos had been taken from photos tagged with #plod. Fitspiration photos with textual swear: 20 photos depicting females and 20 photos depicting males had been chosen. All photos integrated an inspiration quote. Fitspiration photos without textual swear: The the same 40 photos ragged within the principle condition had been introduced, however the inspirational quotes had been digitally eliminated utilizing Photoshop. Control photos: 40 plod photos had been chosen. Within every experimental condition, the show all the design thru which photos had been introduced changed into once randomised. Images had been displayed on camouflage one by one. Every image changed into once displayed for 10 seconds. Image enhancing warning manipulation Members had been randomly assigned to both get hold of a photograph-enhancing warning sooner than viewing the photos (“Please show that many Instagram photos are digitally enhanced, let’s enlighten thru Photoshop or magnificence filters”) or to get hold of no warning. Gender Single set a query to: “With which gender cease you resolve?” Male; Female; Non-Binary; Various Age Measured in years Nationality Single set a query to: “In what nation cease you presently stay?” Australia; Singapore; Various Occupational Plan Single set a query to: “Which of the following ideal describes your occupation?” Student; College employees member; Various (please write in) The JCU Human Research Ethics Committee granted approval to habits the detect. Members had been recruited thru classified ads on bulletin boards on the Australian and Singapore campuses of JCU, the SONA pool of psychology pupil individuals, and an electronic mail despatched to varsity employees. The detect changed into once bustle online utilizing the pc software Qualtrics. This video offers an overview of how randomisation to teams shall be carried out in Qualtrics. You cease no longer resolve on to know the bits and bobs of this job, however it’d simply allow you to attain how random assignment is carried out in Qualtrics. The show all the design thru which detect ingredients had been introduced is as follows: Files sheet (which indicated that participation would be requested about their body image) Instructed consent questions Image enhancing warning introduced (if applicable condition) Stimulus photos introduced Body image measure and demographic questions (including gender) Debrief all the design thru which individuals had been thanked (individuals had been supplied with data on counselling companies and products must quiet they really feel distressed by the detect). In alternate for his or her participation, individuals had been entered into the procedure to build up a $50 gift card to a campus café. Student individuals also got SONA participation credit ranking. References Alberga, A. S., Withnell, S. J., & von Ranson, K. M. (2018). Fitspiration and thinspiration: A comparison across three social networking web sites. Journal of Eating Disorders, 6(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-018-0227-x Prichard, I., McLachlan, A. C., Lavis, T., & Tiggemann, M. (2018). The impact of various forms of #fitspiration imagery on body image, temper, and self-objectification among young females. Intercourse Roles, 78(11), 789-798. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0830-3 Rounds, E. G., & Stutts, L. A. (2021). The impact of fitspiration swear on body satisfaction and harmful temper: An experimental detect. Psychology of Approved Media, 10(2), 267-274. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000288 Slater, A., Varsani, N., & Diedrichs, P. C. (2017). #fitspo or #loveyourself? The impact of fitspiration and self-compassion Instagram photos on females’s body image, self-compassion, and temper. Body Image, 22, 87-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2017.06.004 Tiggemann, M., & Zaccardo, M. (2015). “Enlighten to be match, no longer skinny”: The cease of fitspiration imagery on females’s body image. Body Image, 15, 61-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2015.06.003 Vendemia, M. A., & DeAndrea, D. C. (2018). The outcomes of viewing thin, sexualized selfies on Instagram: Investigating the unbiased of image supply and consciousness of photo enhancing practices. Body Image, 27, 118-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2018.08.013 [1] Your detect would possibly presumably per chance per chance simply, or would possibly presumably per chance per chance simply no longer, absorb reached this deliberate sample size. Caught with an enlargement of homework assignments and feeling wired ? Take hold of expert tutorial assistance & Ranking 100% Plagiarism free papers Ranking A Free Quote
- WE OFFER THE BEST CUSTOM PAPER WRITING SERVICES. WE HAVE DONE THIS QUESTION BEFORE, WE CAN ALSO DO IT FOR YOU.
- Assignment status: Already Solved By Our Experts
- (USA, AUS, UK & CA PhD. Writers)
- CLICK HERE TO GET A PROFESSIONAL WRITER TO WORK ON THIS PAPER AND OTHER SIMILAR PAPERS, GET A NON PLAGIARIZED PAPER FROM OUR EXPERTS
QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPER – NO ChatGPT.NO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER
Looking for unparalleled custom paper writing services? Our team of experienced professionals at AcademicWritersBay.com is here to provide you with top-notch assistance that caters to your unique needs.
We understand the importance of producing original, high-quality papers that reflect your personal voice and meet the rigorous standards of academia. That’s why we assure you that our work is completely plagiarism-free—we craft bespoke solutions tailored exclusively for you.
Why Choose AcademicWritersBay.com?
- Our papers are 100% original, custom-written from scratch.
- We’re here to support you around the clock, any day of the year.
- You’ll find our prices competitive and reasonable.
- We handle papers across all subjects, regardless of urgency or difficulty.
- Need a paper urgently? We can deliver within 6 hours!
- Relax with our on-time delivery commitment.
- We offer money-back and privacy guarantees to ensure your satisfaction and confidentiality.
- Benefit from unlimited amendments upon request to get the paper you envisioned.
- We pledge our dedication to meeting your expectations and achieving the grade you deserve.
Our Process: Getting started with us is as simple as can be. Here’s how to do it:
- Click on the “Place Your Order” tab at the top or the “Order Now” button at the bottom. You’ll be directed to our order form.
- Provide the specifics of your paper in the “PAPER DETAILS” section.
- Select your academic level, the deadline, and the required number of pages.
- Click on “CREATE ACCOUNT & SIGN IN” to provide your registration details, then “PROCEED TO CHECKOUT.”
- Follow the simple payment instructions and soon, our writers will be hard at work on your paper.
AcademicWritersBay.com is dedicated to expediting the writing process without compromising on quality. Our roster of writers boasts individuals with advanced degrees—Masters and PhDs—in a myriad of disciplines, ensuring that no matter the complexity or field of your assignment, we have the expertise to tackle it with finesse. Our quick turnover doesn’t mean rushed work; it means efficiency and priority handling, ensuring your deadlines are met with the excellence your academics demand.
