Literature Overview: The Spend of Clinical Programs to Give a elevate to Outcomes and Efficiencies<\/p>\n
Unique technology\u2014and the utility of existing technology\u2014easiest seems to be in healthcare settings after careful and necessary research. The stakes are excessive, and unique scientific systems deserve to give evidence of obvious affect on outcomes or efficiencies.<\/p>\n
Nurse informaticists and healthcare leaders formulate scientific intention programs. As these programs are regularly in line with technology traits, informaticists and others comprise then benefited from consulting existing research to uncover their considering.<\/p>\n
In this Project, you’re going to review existing research enraged by the utility of scientific systems. After reviewing, you’re going to summarize your findings.<\/p>\n
Resources<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Guarantee to review the Finding out Resources earlier than finishing this process.
Click the weekly resources link to entry the resources. <\/p>\n
WEEKLY RESOURCES<\/strong><\/p>\n To Prepare:<\/strong><\/p>\n The Project: (4-5 pages no longer including the title and reference page)<\/strong><\/p>\n In a 4- to 5-page paper, synthesize the stare-reviewed research you reviewed.\u00a0Format your Project as an Annotated Bibliography. Guarantee to address the next:<\/p>\n By Day 7 of Week 8<\/p>\n Submit your accomplished Project.<\/p>\n submission recordsdata<\/p>\n Before submitting your final project, you would possibly perhaps test your draft for authenticity. To confirm your draft, entry the Turnitin Drafts<\/strong> from the Open up Right here<\/strong> arrangement. <\/p>\n High of Get<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Upload a file, or resolve a file you’ve got already uploaded. Hasten a file right here, or Decide a file so that you just can add<\/span> <=\"\" div=\"\" style=\"text-size-adjust: auto; margin: 10px 0px;\"> I conform to the tool’s <\/span>Discontinue-User License Settlement<\/span> This project submission is my possess, customary work<\/span> *<\/span> <\/p>\n Bottom of Get<\/p>\n Rubric<\/p>\n NURS_5051_Module04_Week08_Assignment_Rubric<\/strong><\/p>\n <\/p>\n NURS_5051_Module04_Week08_Assignment_Rubric Requirements Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Finding out Result<\/span>In a 4- to 5-page paper, synthesize the stare-reviewed research you reviewed. Format your Project as an Annotated Bibliography. Guarantee to address the next:\u00b7 Properly identify 4 stare-reviewed research articles you reviewed. 20\u00a0to >17.0\u00a0ptsExcellent<\/span><\/b>The response identifies 4 stare-reviewed research articles for the Project. 17\u00a0to >15.0\u00a0ptsGood<\/span><\/b>The response identifies 3 stare-reviewed research articles and one stare-reviewed article for the Project. 15\u00a0to >13.0\u00a0ptsFair<\/span><\/b>The response identifies 4 or much less stare-reviewed articles 13\u00a0to >0\u00a0ptsPoor<\/span><\/b>The response identifies lower than 4 stare-reviewed articles or stare-reviewed articles are lacking 20\u00a0pts This criterion is linked to a Finding out Result<\/span>\u00b7 Summarize every scrutinize, explaining the enchancment to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons realized from the utility of the scientific intention every stare-reviewed article described. Be train and present examples. 40\u00a0to >35.0\u00a0ptsExcellent<\/span><\/b>The response precisely and completely summarizes intimately every scrutinize reviewed, explaining intimately the enchancment to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons realized from the utility of the scientific intention every stare-reviewed article described….Explicit, staunch, and detailed examples are supplied which fully toughen the response. 35\u00a0to >31.0\u00a0ptsGood<\/span><\/b>The response summarizes every scrutinize reviewed, explaining the enchancment to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons realized from the utility of the scientific intention every stare-reviewed article described….Correct examples are supplied which toughen the response supplied. 31\u00a0to >27.0\u00a0ptsFair<\/span><\/b>The response is lacking one or two of the wanted substances or summaries are superficially addressed. 27\u00a0to >0\u00a0ptsPoor<\/span><\/b>The response is lacking three or extra required substances or the summaries are superficially addressed. 40\u00a0pts This criterion is linked to a Finding out Result<\/span>\u00b7 Synthesize the findings from the 4 stare-reviewed research articles in a cohesive conclusion. 25\u00a0to >22.0\u00a0ptsExcellent<\/span><\/b>Response features a synthesis of the findings in an exceptionally well-written conclusion. 22\u00a0to >19.0\u00a0ptsGood<\/span><\/b>Response features a synthesis of the findings in a well-written conclusion. 19\u00a0to >17.0\u00a0ptsFair<\/span><\/b>The response is lacking a synthesis of the findings or the conclusion is superficial. 17\u00a0to >0\u00a0ptsPoor<\/span><\/b>The response is lacking a synthesis of the findings and the conclusion is no longer staunch or is lacking. 25\u00a0pts This criterion is linked to a Finding out Result<\/span>Written Expression and Formatting \u2013 Paragraph Style and Group:Paragraphs draw sure functions that toughen well developed recommendations, lumber logically, and point to continuity of recommendations. Sentences are fastidiously focused\u2013neither long and rambling nor quick and lacking substance. 5\u00a0to >4.0\u00a0ptsExcellent<\/span><\/b>Paragraphs and sentences practice writing standards for lumber, continuity, and clarity. 4\u00a0to >3.0\u00a0ptsGood<\/span><\/b>Paragraphs and sentences practice writing standards for lumber, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. 3\u00a0to >2.0\u00a0ptsFair<\/span><\/b>Paragraphs and sentences practice writing standards for lumber, continuity, and clarity 60%- Seventy 9% of the time. 2\u00a0to >0\u00a0ptsPoor<\/span><\/b>Paragraphs and sentences practice writing standards for lumber, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. 5\u00a0pts This criterion is linked to a Finding out Result<\/span>Written Expression and Formatting \u2013 English writing standards:Correct grammar, mechanics, and appropriate punctuation 5\u00a0to >4.0\u00a0ptsExcellent<\/span><\/b>Uses appropriate grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. 4\u00a0to >3.0\u00a0ptsGood<\/span><\/b>Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 3\u00a0to >2.0\u00a0ptsFair<\/span><\/b>Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.\n
\n
\n
\n
\n\n
\n \n \n \n \n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n \n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n \n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n
\n \n \n \n
\n \n \n \n
\n \n \n \n
\n \n \n