{"id":30583,"date":"2026-04-25T02:59:27","date_gmt":"2026-04-25T02:59:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/academicwritersbay.com\/solutions\/overview-of-the-evaluation-job-on-this-particular-particular-person-assessment-its-possible-youll-perchance-perchance-be-required-to-look-at-microeconomic-theories-and-ideas-to-analyse-the-market-w\/"},"modified":"2026-04-25T02:59:27","modified_gmt":"2026-04-25T02:59:27","slug":"overview-of-the-evaluation-job-on-this-particular-particular-person-assessment-its-possible-youll-perchance-perchance-be-required-to-look-at-microeconomic-theories-and-ideas-to-analyse-the-market-w","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/academicwritersbay.com\/solutions\/overview-of-the-evaluation-job-on-this-particular-particular-person-assessment-its-possible-youll-perchance-perchance-be-required-to-look-at-microeconomic-theories-and-ideas-to-analyse-the-market-w\/","title":{"rendered":"Overview of the Evaluation Job On this particular particular person assessment, it’s possible you’ll perchance perchance be required to look at microeconomic theories and ideas to analyse the market wherein a particular Australian company operates. T"},"content":{"rendered":"

ASSESSMENT BRIEF<\/strong><\/h2>\n

BUS9005 Economics for International Industry<\/strong><\/p>\n

Evaluation 2<\/strong><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Evaluation Description<\/strong><\/td>\nMicroeconomics Account<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Particular particular person\/Team<\/strong><\/td>\nParticular particular person<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Dimension<\/strong><\/td>\n1,500 phrases<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Self-discipline Studying Outcomes<\/strong><\/td>\na, b, c, d<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Week Due<\/strong><\/td>\nWeek 9<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Weighting<\/strong><\/td>\n30%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Relate of Generative Artificial Intelligence (Gen AI)<\/strong><\/td>\nNot allowed<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

<\/p>\n

Overview of the Evaluation Job<\/strong><\/p>\n

On this particular particular person assessment, it’s possible you’ll perchance perchance be required to look at microeconomic theories and ideas to analyse the market wherein a particular Australian company operates. This file will assess your skill to critically review how market forces, market constructions, and market screw ups impact industry intention and public policy.<\/em><\/p>\n

You should pick out one Australian company (from any industry equivalent to retail, transport, technology, mining, finance, etc.) and learn about:<\/em><\/p>\n

    \n
  • The provision and rely on stipulations shaping the company’s market<\/li>\n
  • The market constructing and its implications for industry intention<\/li>\n
  • Any related market failure(s) and how public policy addresses them.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

    This task encourages you to link conception to staunch-world Australian industry stipulations, showcasing your skill to mediate critically and observe financial reasoning to realistic industry challenges.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

    Evaluation Directions<\/strong><\/p>\n

    Resolve one Australian company operating in a particular industry (e.g., retail, banking, transport, vitality, technology) and put together a 1500-observe analytical file addressing the following:<\/p>\n

    Fragment A: Company and Market Context (Approx. 300 phrases)<\/strong><\/p>\n

      \n
    • Portray your chosen company and its major companies and products or merchandise, major potentialities and competitors<\/li>\n
    • Present at the least one half of proof out of your chosen company (e.g., screenshot or link to annual file, product page, or media launch).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

      Fragment B: Market Dynamics (Approx. 400 phrases)<\/strong><\/p>\n

        \n
      • Decide out one particular companies and products or merchandise provided by your chosen company.<\/li>\n
      • Title three components that pick rely on and three components that pick provide for this product\/carrier.<\/li>\n
      • Discuss about how adjustments in these components impact rely on and provide. Relate rely on and provide curves to illustrate the outcomes (hand-drawn, digital, or spreadsheet graphs are acceptable).<\/li>\n
      • Present at the least one half of proof out of your chosen company, or credible market sources. (e.g., screenshot or link to annual file, product page, or media launch).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

        Fragment C: Market Construction and Method (Approx. 400 phrases)<\/strong><\/p>\n

          \n
        • Title and account for the market constructing wherein your company operates (excellent competitors, monopolistic competitors, oligopoly, or monopoly).<\/li>\n
        • Clearly provide three reasons supporting your classification (e.g., selection of competitors, product differentiation, boundaries to entry, pricing vitality).<\/li>\n
        • Show how this market constructing influences the company’s strategic choices equivalent to pricing, innovation, or advertising.<\/li>\n
        • Present at the least one half of proof out of your chosen company, or credible market sources. (e.g., screenshot or link to annual file, product page, or media launch).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

          Fragment D: Market Failure and Protection Response (Approx. 400 phrases)<\/strong><\/p>\n

            \n
          • Title a related market failure affecting your chosen company or industry (e.g., pollution, records asymmetry, beneath-provision of public goods).<\/li>\n
          • Analyse how this failure impacts the company, consumers, or society.<\/li>\n
          • Evaluation an Australian govt policy or regulation addressing this danger and focus on whether it successfully corrects the procedure back.<\/li>\n
          • Present at the least one half of proof to aid your resolution (e.g., screenshot or link to annual file, product page, or media launch).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

            Evaluation Phases and Mark Allocation<\/strong><\/p>\n

            <\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
            Stage<\/strong><\/td>\nDescription<\/strong><\/td>\nWeek Due<\/strong><\/td>\nMarks<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
            Checkpoint 1 Company Need and Rationale<\/td>\nDecide out one Australian company and post your different in the Dialogue Forum. Most lively three college students could perchance also fair pick out the the same company. Present a short justification (100\u2013150 phrases) explaining why you chose this company.<\/td>\nWeek 4<\/td>\n3 marks<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
            Checkpoint 2 Draft Submission<\/td>\nPut up a short draft (roughly 400\u2013500 phrases) displaying your progress. This could also fair unruffled consist of early sections (Fragment A and B) with some preliminary records or graphs. The draft could perchance also fair unruffled pronounce staunch progress and working out, no longer a full file.<\/td>\nWeek 8<\/td>\n2 marks<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
            Final Account Submission<\/td>\nPut up your accomplished 1,500-observe file addressing Ingredients A\u2013D.<\/td>\nWeek 9<\/td>\n25 marks<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

            <\/p>\n

            Other Directions<\/strong><\/p>\n

              \n
            • Construction of the file \u2013 Introduction, solutions to segment A-D, summary\/conclusion, reference list.<\/li>\n
            • Reference list is no longer segment of the observe depend.<\/li>\n
            • Submission layout- observe file. All submissions thru Turnitin on Canvas.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

              This assessment could perchance also fair unruffled incorporate APA seventh referencing model. For aid on reference mediate in regards to the AIHE Studying Toughen Hub on canvas for extra records.<\/strong><\/p>\n

              Relate of GenAI is no longer allowed:<\/strong><\/p>\n

              On this assessment, the utilization of generative man made intelligence (GenAI) tools is no longer licensed. These tools consist of recount mills, records analysis tools, and other AI-assisted technologies. Students must make certain that their work is entirely their very rep. Any submission that entails recount created by unauthorised explain of man made intelligence tools is a breach of academic integrity.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

              Marking Criteria<\/strong><\/p>\n

              Please seek advice from the linked rubric for marking criteria and requirements of performance. Optimistic solutions could be offered within a successfully timed formulation in line with AIHE Evaluation Direction of.<\/p>\n

              This assessment is no longer redeemable except in every other case specified.<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

              Limits for Assessments<\/strong><\/p>\n

              Written submissions that exceed the observe restrict by more than 10% will discontinue to be marked from the level at which that restrict is exceeded.<\/p>\n

              Closing dates for in-particular person or video presentations that exceed the allocated closing date by more than 10% will discontinue to be marked from the level at which that restrict is exceeded, and Lecturers could perchance also fair quiz college students to discontinue their presentation.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

              Evaluation Variation and Special Consideration<\/strong><\/p>\n

              Students could be eligible for a variation to assessment arrangements when sudden or extenuating circumstances impact on their performance or their skill to whole their assessment tasks by or on the specified date. Students must whole the Software to Fluctuate Evaluation with proof.<\/p>\n

              Students with identified, particular or particular needs could perchance also fair observe for adaptations to assessment in the topic. Students are required to contact the Student Toughen Officer or Student Studying Consultant to chat about their particular needs.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

              Tiresome Assignment Submission Penalties<\/strong><\/p>\n

              An assessment task is leisurely for submission when it’s no longer submitted by the due date and time as indicated on Canvas, or by an agreed extension date and time as confirmed by the topic lecturer.<\/p>\n

              Tiresome assessment tasks could be penalised at the bustle of 5% of most that it’s possible you’ll perchance be factor in marks, per calendar day (i.e. 24 hours or segment thereof). After seven (7) calendar days, assignments will entice zero (0) marks. Assignments submitted at any stage within the principle 24 hours after the closing date could be realizing of as to be in some unspecified time in the future leisurely and subsequently discipline to the associated penalty. For added detail mediate about: AIHE Evaluation Direction of.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

              Tutorial Integrity<\/strong><\/p>\n

              Tutorial integrity is a foremost quality for larger training and is a main segment of studying and instructing. AIHE is committed to promoting academic integrity and moral behaviour. The recognition of AIHE and its graduates, and the academic standing of its skills rests with its skill to promote academic integrity and set up of living up academic misconduct somewhat and consistently.<\/p>\n

              All college students must change into familiar with, and understand the meaning and consequences of plagiarism, dishonest in exams and tests, unauthorised explain of man made intelligence, collusion, contract dishonest and other academic offences beneath the AIHE Tutorial Integrity Protection.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

              Marking Rubric & Requirements of Efficiency<\/strong><\/p>\n

              Particular particular person Account (Microeconomics)<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

              <\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
              Criteria<\/strong><\/td>\nHigh Distinction (85-100%)<\/strong><\/td>\nDistinction (75-84%)<\/strong><\/td>\nCredit (65-74%)<\/strong><\/td>\nCirculation (50-64%)<\/strong><\/td>\nFail (0-49%)<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
              Checkpoint 1: Company Need & Rationale (3 marks)<\/strong><\/td>\nCompany selection is recurring, highly related, and successfully-justified with obvious reasoning and proof of initiative.<\/td>\nCompany clearly justified; sound rationale offered.<\/td>\nRelevant company chosen with overall justification.<\/td>\nCompany popular but light or unclear justification.<\/td>\nNo submission, leisurely post, or unjustified different.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
              Checkpoint 2: Draft Progress Submission (2 marks)<\/strong><\/td>\nOptimistic and crucial progress. Demonstrates earn working out of conception and explain of proof.<\/td>\nSuperb progress and partial analysis shown.<\/td>\nSome progress is obvious but uneven or tiny.<\/td>\nMinimal progress lacks meaningful pattern.<\/td>\nNo or superficial draft submitted.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
              Fragment A: Company & Market Context (5 marks)<\/strong><\/td>\nOffers an legal, concise, and insightful overview of the company, its major merchandise\/companies and products, potentialities, and competitors. Involves at the least one related, verified half of proof (e.g. screenshot or link).<\/td>\nOptimistic description of company and context; mostly legal proof dilapidated successfully.<\/td>\nReasonable description; minor gaps or tiny proof.<\/td>\nFrequent or in part appropriate overview; minimal or unclear proof.<\/td>\nWrong or incomplete company description; no supporting proof.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
              Fragment B \u2013 Market Dynamics (6 marks)<\/strong><\/td>\nThorough and successfully-structured analysis of three rely on and three provide components. Clearly explains how adjustments impact the market the utilization of legal, labelled graphs. Integrates credible proof from company or market sources.<\/td>\nSuperb clarification of rely on and provide components with mostly obvious diagrams and proof.<\/td>\nAmple analysis, some conception utilized; graphs or proof tiny or partly wrong.<\/td>\nFrequent or uneven discussion of components; light theoretical links or unclear graphs.<\/td>\nErroneous or missing discussion; lacks theoretical working out or proof.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
              Fragment C \u2013 Market Construction and Method (7 marks)<\/strong><\/td>\nMarket constructing precisely identified and convincingly justified with three earn reasons (selection of competitors, differentiation, boundaries, pricing vitality). Insightful analysis of strategic implications (pricing, innovation, advertising). Uses related and verified proof.<\/td>\nLawful classification and justification with factual discussion of intention; sound proof.<\/td>\nReasonable identification and partial justification; some reference to intention and proof.<\/td>\nRestricted or in part appropriate identification; light justification or minimal strategic link.<\/td>\nErroneous or missing classification; no obvious reasoning or proof.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
              Fragment D \u2013 Market Failure and Protection Response (5 marks)<\/strong><\/td>\nClearly name the related market failure(s). Offers serious analysis of impact on company, consumers and society; evaluates policy response with perception and credible proof.<\/td>\nSuperb analysis of market failure and policy with related examples.<\/td>\nAmple discussion; essentially descriptive with some evaluate.<\/td>\nFrequent or generalised description; tiny policy discussion.<\/td>\nWrong or missing discussion; no link to proof or policy.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
              Tutorial Writing, Referencing & Integrity (2 marks)<\/strong><\/td>\nSuperb organisation, academic tone, and legal referencing (APA 7); completely demonstrates originality and integrity.<\/td>\nOptimistic writing and mostly appropriate referencing; factual proof of authenticity.<\/td>\nAmple writing. Some referencing or clarity complications.<\/td>\nIdentical old constructing or referencing. Restricted demonstration of rep work.<\/td>\nPoorly written or referenced. Doable academic integrity issues.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

              <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

              ASSESSMENT BRIEF BUS9005 Economics for International Industry Evaluation 2 Evaluation Description Microeconomics Account Particular particular person\/Team Particular particular person Dimension 1,500 phrases Self-discipline Studying Outcomes a, b, c, d Week Due Week 9 Weighting 30% Relate of Generative Artificial Intelligence (Gen AI) Not allowed Overview of the Evaluation Job On this particular particular person assessment, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-30583","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-solutions"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/academicwritersbay.com\/solutions\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30583","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/academicwritersbay.com\/solutions\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/academicwritersbay.com\/solutions\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/academicwritersbay.com\/solutions\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/academicwritersbay.com\/solutions\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=30583"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/academicwritersbay.com\/solutions\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30583\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/academicwritersbay.com\/solutions\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=30583"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/academicwritersbay.com\/solutions\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=30583"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/academicwritersbay.com\/solutions\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=30583"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}