{"id":31924,"date":"2026-06-08T12:59:56","date_gmt":"2026-06-08T12:59:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/academicwritersbay.com\/solutions\/task-project-mkp3-mkp3-task-1-emerging-technology-and-nursing-education-emerging-trends-and-challenges-in-21st-century-nursing-education-c922-prfa-mkp3-preparation-acti\/"},"modified":"2026-06-08T12:59:56","modified_gmt":"2026-06-08T12:59:56","slug":"task-project-mkp3-mkp3-task-1-emerging-technology-and-nursing-education-emerging-trends-and-challenges-in-21st-century-nursing-education-c922-prfa-mkp3-preparation-acti","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/academicwritersbay.com\/solutions\/task-project-mkp3-mkp3-task-1-emerging-technology-and-nursing-education-emerging-trends-and-challenges-in-21st-century-nursing-education-c922-prfa-mkp3-preparation-acti\/","title":{"rendered":"Task project: MKP3 \u2014 MKP3 TASK 1: EMERGING TECHNOLOGY AND NURSING EDUCATION EMERGING TRENDS AND CHALLENGES IN 21ST CENTURY NURSING EDUCATION \u2014 C922 PRFA \u2014 MKP3 Preparation Activity"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>MKP3 \u2014 MKP3 TASK 1: EMERGING TECHNOLOGY AND NURSING EDUCATION<br \/>EMERGING TRENDS AND CHALLENGES IN 21ST CENTURY NURSING EDUCATION \u2014 C922 PRFA \u2014 MKP3<br \/>Preparation Activity Overview Submissions Review Reveal<br \/>COMPETENCIES<br \/>7057.1.1 : Acknowledge Tutorial Developments<br \/>The learner acknowledges the affect of developments, significant challenges, and developments in academic technology in higher education in the twenty first century.<br \/>7057.1.2 : Propose Nursing Education Methods<br \/>The learner proposes recommendations for tutorial nursing education functions to accommodate the new and future challenges confronted by nursing apply.<br \/>7057.1.3 : Provoke Trade<br \/>The learner collaborates with nursing leaders in various healthcare settings to provoke switch by policy efficacy that strengthens nursing apply and advances the device forward for healthcare.<br \/>INTRODUCTION<br \/>Tutorial nurse educators encourage a essentially major role as leaders and brokers of switch internal a firm, assuredly a college of nursing. Numerous the challenges in nursing education are the outcomes of developments, clinical calls for, and developments in academic technology in higher education in the twenty first century. Internal nursing education, there are also evolving applied sciences in healthcare, an increasing scope of apply, and steady-ethical considerations, which all salvage an tag on the quality and safety of patient care. Nursing program curricula must be repeatedly revised to reflect these changes and shatter obvious graduates from nursing functions are in a home to successfully enter the job market.<br \/>For this project, you are going to imply the integration of technology into curriculum to income an academic nursing education program. The switch would maybe be implemented in the direction \u201cThe Role of the BSN Nurse in Selling Neighborhood Health,\u201d which modified into once created in the outdated MSNEDU classes. You would possibly exercise 5 search for-reviewed articles published at some level of the final 5 years to envision fresh and rising academic applied sciences suggested by educated organizations. You then will exercise this files to establish and imply the new technology integration to make stronger the curricular switch. An diagnosis of organizational readiness for switch to \u201cThe Role of the BSN Nurse in Selling Neighborhood Health\u201d might nonetheless even be included.<br \/>Define: You&#8217;ve got gotten to submit and cross C921 ahead of submitting the duty in C922.<br \/>REQUIREMENTS<br \/>Your submission must signify your long-established work and working out of the direction field matter. Most efficiency overview submissions are robotically scanned by the WGU similarity checker. College students are strongly encouraged to wait for the similarity file to generate after uploading their work after which overview it to shatter obvious Tutorial Authenticity pointers are met ahead of submitting the file for evaluation. Survey Working out Similarity Experiences for extra files.<br \/>Grammarly Define:<br \/>Expert Communique would maybe be robotically assessed by Grammarly for Education in most efficiency assessments ahead of a scholar submits work for evaluation. College students are strongly encouraged to envision the Grammarly for Education feedback earlier than submitting work for evaluation, because the total submission won&#8217;t cross with out this ingredient passing. Survey Use Grammarly for Education Successfully for extra files.<br \/>Microsoft Data Define:<br \/>Write your paper in Microsoft Notice (.doc or .docx) unless but any other Microsoft product, or pdf, is specified in the duty directions.Tasks maynotbe submitted as cloud links, equivalent to links to Google Medical doctors, Google Slides, OneDrive, and many others. All supporting documentation, equivalent to screenshots and proof of trip, might nonetheless be nonetheless in a pdf file and submitted separately from the predominant file.For added files, please uncover Computer System and Know-how Requirements.<br \/>Sources outmoded to make stronger this overview must be published at some level of the outdated 10 years, rather then for legacy and seminal sources. Please in moderation overview the rubric for any exceptions.<br \/>You&#8217;ve got gotten to make exercise of the rubric to insist the creation of your submission because it provides detailed criteria that will probably be outmoded to bear in mind your work. Every requirement below would be evaluated by greater than one rubric ingredient. The rubric ingredient titles might dangle hyperlinks to linked parts of the direction.<br \/>Construct a proper proposal using the connected \u201cC922 Curriculum Know-how Proposal Template\u201d that integrates the chosen rising technology for a curricular switch into the beforehand developed direction, \u201cThe Role of the BSN Nurse in Selling Neighborhood Health.\u201d Save no longer modify or switch the template contents or structure.<br \/>A. Write an executive summary (suggested length of 1 web page) that contains a synopsis of the key aspects of your proposal.<br \/>Define: The executive summary is written after getting gotten performed your proposal.<br \/>B. Entire a literature overview of your curriculum technology proposal on using technology in education by doing the following:<br \/>1. Entire the literature overview summary table in the connected \u201cC922 Curriculum Know-how Proposal Template\u201d using 5 search for-reviewed articles published at some level of the final 5 years that enhance your curriculum technology proposal. Include your literature overview summary table as Table 1, and reference Table 1 in the parable where the literature overview findings are discussed.<br \/>2. Synthesize your literature overview findings, including all 5 search for-reviewed articles you reviewed in piece B1 and how the articles enhance your specific technology proposal. Map connections between an identical articles, and highlight any dissimilar or contradictory findings, if appropriate.<br \/>3. Essentially basically based on your literature overview, discuss the need for additional research or trend relative to the proposed technology.<br \/>C. Entire a needs overview and look the new technology challenges by doing the following: 1. Portray the project outmoded to habits a curricular technology needs overview using a predicament diagnosis as outlined in Table 2 in the connected \u201cC922 Curriculum Know-how Proposal Template.\u201d. a. Identify three tutorial stakeholders (e.g., faculty, college students, preceptors, IT personnel) and their roles in the gap diagnosis.<br \/>b. Define recommendations of collaboration with stakeholders in interprofessional groups and why the recommendations would be efficient.<br \/>2. Compare two fresh or rising applied sciences by describing the advantages and disadvantages of every as they apply to \u201cThe Role of the BSN Nurse in Selling Neighborhood Health.\u201d 3. Discuss about three challenges with the new snarl of technology in the direction \u201cThe Role of the BSN Nurse in Selling Neighborhood Health,\u201d including examples for every peril.<br \/>4. Define how you are going to overcome the three challenges from piece C3.<br \/>5. Summarize your findings of the curricular technology needs overview.<br \/>a. Portray the collaboration alongside with your stakeholders to succeed in a consensus on one technology from piece C2.<br \/>D. Identify the rising technology and total a pressure field diagnosis to establish forces for and towards your curriculum technology proposal using Table 3 in the connected \u201cC922 Curriculum Know-how Proposal Template.\u201d<br \/>1. Collaborate alongside with your preceptor and stakeholders to establish factors that can salvage an tag on the adoption of your proposal by doing the following:<br \/>a. Analyze two internal and two exterior organizational factors that can facilitate or obstruct implementation.<br \/>b. Portray three forces that can facilitate integration of the identified rising technology in the direction \u201cThe Role of the BSN Nurse in Selling Neighborhood Health.\u201d<br \/>c. Portray three forces that can obstruct integration of the identified rising technology in the direction \u201cThe Role of the BSN Nurse in Selling Neighborhood Health.\u201d<br \/>2. Identify a switch theory acceptable for your technology integration and adoption. a. Interpret the selected switch theory from piece D2.<br \/>b. Portray doable resistance and barriers to the technology switch.<br \/>c. Discuss about how you intend to place into effect the switch theory identified in piece D2.<br \/>E. Write a conclusion specializing in the affect and significance of your proposal by doing the following: 1. Discuss about the cause and rationale of your proposal.<br \/>2. Define how your proposal fills the identified curriculum needs gap.<br \/>3. Discuss about why enforcing this proposal is very vital and the affect this can salvage on the broader field of nursing.<br \/>F. Acknowledge sources, using in-textual snarl material citations and references, for snarl material that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.<br \/>G. Define educated communication in the snarl material and presentation of your submission.<br \/>File Restrictions<br \/>File establish might dangle fully letters, numbers, areas, and these symbols: ! -_. * \u2018 ( )<br \/>File size limit: 200 MB<br \/>File forms allowed: doc, docx, rtf, xls, xlsx, ppt, pptx, odt, pdf, csv, txt, qt, mov, mpg, avi, mp3, wav, mp4, wma, flv, asf, mpeg, wmv, m4v, svg, tif, tiff, jpeg, jpg, gif, png, zip, rar, tar, 7z<br \/>RUBRIC<br \/>A:EXECUTIVE SUMMARY<\/p>\n<p>NOT EVIDENT<br \/>An executive summary is no longer provided.<br \/>B1:LITERATURE REVIEW SUMMARY TABLE<br \/>NOT EVIDENT<br \/>A literature overview summary ta ble is no longer provided.<br \/>B2:LITERATURE REVIEW FINDINGS<br \/>APPROACHING<br \/>COMPETENCE<br \/>The executive summary does no longer consist of an intensive synopsis of key aspects of the proposal.<br \/>APPROACHING<br \/>COMPETENCE<br \/>The literature overview summary table provides fully one\u20134 articles. Or 1 or extra of the articles are<br \/>no longer search for-reviewed, weren&#8217;t published in the final 5 years, or enact no longer enhance the curriculum technology proposal. Or the lit erature overview summary table is incorrect. Or the articles refer enced in the parable half of the literature overview are no longer in cluded in the literature overview summary table, or the table is no longer provided and referenced as Table 1 in the curriculum proposal.<br \/>COMPETENT<br \/>The executive summary contains an intensive synopsis of key aspects of the proposal.<br \/>COMPETENT<br \/>The literature overview summary table provides 5 search for-reviewed articles published at some level of the final 5 years that enhance the curricu lum technology proposal. The lit erature overview summary table is correct. The articles referenced in the parable half of the lit erature overview are included in the literature overview summary table, and the table is provided and referenced as Table 1 in the curriculum proposal.<\/p>\n<p>NOT EVIDENT APPROACHING COMPETENCE<br \/>COMPETENT<\/p>\n<p>A synthesis of literature overview findings is no longer provided.<br \/>B3:GAPS IN RESEARCH<br \/>NOT EVIDENT<br \/>A dialogue of the need for fur ther research or trend is no longer provided.<br \/>C1:GAP ANALYSIS PROCESS<br \/>NOT EVIDENT<br \/>An outline of the needs as sessment project is no longer<br \/>provided.<br \/>C1A:STAKEHOLDERS<br \/>NOT EVIDENT<br \/>No tutorial stakeholders are identified.<br \/>The synthesis of literature re glimpse findings does no longer consist of 1 or extra of the 5 search for-reviewed articles, or the synthesis is unor ganized or no longer cohesive. Or the synthesis does no longer blueprint connec tions or highlight contradictions between the articles as applica ble. Or the synthesis does no longer procure a convincing case for the technology proposal.<br \/>APPROACHING<br \/>COMPETENCE<br \/>The dialogue is no longer supported by the literature overview or does no longer enlighten an steady working out of how additional research or trend is major linked to the educated posed technology.<br \/>APPROACHING<br \/>COMPETENCE<br \/>The description of the project outmoded to habits a curricular technology needs overview using a predicament diagnosis is incorrect or incomplete.<br \/>APPROACHING<br \/>COMPETENCE<br \/>Finest 1 or 2 tutorial stakehold ers are identified, or every of the stakeholders\u2019 roles in the gap diagnosis are no longer identified. Or the identified stakeholders and<br \/>The synthesis of literature re glimpse findings contains all 5 search for reviewed articles, and the syn thesis is organized and cohesive. The synthesis attracts connections or highlights contradictions be tween the articles as appropriate to procure a convincing case for the technology proposal.<br \/>COMPETENT<br \/>The dialogue is supported by the literature overview and demon strates an steady model ing of how additional research or trend is major linked to the proposed technology.<br \/>COMPETENT<br \/>The description of the project outmoded to habits a curricular technology needs overview us ing a predicament diagnosis is correct and total.<br \/>COMPETENT<br \/>3 tutorial stakeholders and each of their roles in the gap diagnosis are precisely identified for the project.<br \/>C1B:METHODS OF COLLABORATION<br \/>NOT EVIDENT<br \/>An evidence is no longer provided.<br \/>C2:CURRENT OR EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES<br \/>NOT EVIDENT<br \/>A comparability is no longer provided.<br \/>C3:TECHNOLOGY CHALLENGES<br \/>NOT EVIDENT<br \/>A dialogue of challenges is no longer provided.<br \/>roles are incorrect for the project.<br \/>APPROACHING<br \/>COMPETENCE<br \/>The explanation contains fully one formula of collaboration internal interprofessional groups, or the included recommendations would no longer be<br \/>efficient. Or an explanation is no longer provided on how every formula would be outmoded or why every formula would be efficient in fostering collaboration.<br \/>APPROACHING<br \/>COMPETENCE<br \/>The comparability is no longer compre hensive, or it does no longer accu rately establish the advantages or disadvantages of two fresh or rising applied sciences. The identified advantages and disad vantages of every technology enact no longer consist of a description of their utility to \u201cThe Role of the BSN Nurse in Selling Neighborhood Health\u201d direction.<br \/>APPROACHING<br \/>COMPETENCE<br \/>The dialogue does no longer accu rately address 3 challenges with the new snarl of technology, or it does no longer provide examples for every peril.<br \/>COMPETENT<br \/>The explanation contains 2 or extra efficient recommendations of col laboration with the interprofes sional team. For every formula, an explanation is provided on how the device would be outmoded and why the device would be effec tive in fostering collaboration.<br \/>COMPETENT<br \/>The comparability comprehen sively and precisely identifies advantages and disadvantages of two fresh or rising technolo gies. The identified advantages and disadvantages of every tech nology consist of a description of their utility to \u201cThe Role of the BSN Nurse in Selling Neighborhood Health\u201d direction.<br \/>COMPETENT<br \/>The dialogue precisely advert attire 3 challenges with the new snarl of technology and provides examples for every peril.<br \/>C4:OVERCOMING CHALLENGES<br \/>NOT EVIDENT<br \/>An evidence of  over come challenges is no longer provided.<br \/>C5:SUMMARY OF FINDINGS<br \/>NOT EVIDENT<br \/>The submission does no longer sum marize any findings.<br \/>C5A:COLLABORATION WITH STAKEHOLDERS<br \/>NOT EVIDENT<br \/>An outline of collaboration with stakeholders is no longer<br \/>provided.<br \/>D:FORCE FIELD ANALYSIS<br \/>NOT EVIDENT<br \/>An rising technology is no longer identified, and a pressure field<br \/>diagnosis is no longer provided.<br \/>APPROACHING<br \/>COMPETENCE<br \/>The explanation of easy recommendations to overcome the 3 challenges from piece C3 is incomplete or irrele vant. Or the recommendations would be ineffective.<br \/>APPROACHING<br \/>COMPETENCE<br \/>The submission contains a sum mary of findings, but the findings are no longer linked to the curricu lar technology needs. Or the summary does no longer exercise concise aspects linked to the efficient ness of the educational technol ogy in assembly the finding out needs of faculty students.<br \/>APPROACHING<br \/>COMPETENCE<br \/>The description of the collabora tion with stakeholders does no longer consist of the opinions, feedback, or opposition from stakeholders or how they reached the con sensus on 1 technology.<br \/>APPROACHING<br \/>COMPETENCE<br \/>The rising technology is identified, but the pressure field diagnosis is incomplete or identi fies unrealistic forces for and<br \/>COMPETENT<br \/>The explanation of easy recommendations to overcome the 3 challenges from piece C3 is total and linked, and the recommendations would be efficient.<br \/>COMPETENT<br \/>The submission contains a sum mary of linked findings of cur ricular technology needs, using concise aspects linked to the ef<br \/>fectiveness of the educational technology in assembly the be taught ing needs of faculty students.<br \/>COMPETENT<br \/>The description of the collabora tion with stakeholders contains the opinions, feedback, and op space from stakeholders and how they reached the consensus on 1 technology.<br \/>COMPETENT<br \/>The rising technology is iden tified, and the pressure field diagnosis is total and realistically iden tifies forces for and towards the<br \/>curriculum technology proposal<br \/>D1A:ORGANIZATIONAL FACTORS<br \/>NOT EVIDENT<br \/>An diagnosis of issues is no longer provided.<br \/>D1B:FORCES FOR INTEGRATION<br \/>NOT EVIDENT<br \/>An outline of forces for inte gration is no longer provided.<br \/>D1C:CHALLENGES TO INTEGRATION<br \/>NOT EVIDENT<br \/>An outline of forces impeding integration is no longer provided.<br \/>towards the curriculum technol ogy proposal. Or the diagnosis is no longer performed in the connected \u201cC922 Curriculum Know-how Proposal Template.\u201d<br \/>APPROACHING<br \/>COMPETENCE<br \/>The diagnosis contains fewer than 2 internal or fewer than 2 exter nal organizational factors that can facilitate or obstruct imple mentation. Or 1 or extra of the factors are unrealistic.<br \/>APPROACHING<br \/>COMPETENCE<br \/>The description does no longer advert dress 3 forces that can facilitate integration of the identified rising technology in the direction \u201cThe Role of the BSN Nurse in Selling Neighborhood Health.\u201d Or 1 or extra of the identified forces are unrealistic.<br \/>APPROACHING<br \/>COMPETENCE<br \/>The description does no longer advert dress 3 forces that can obstruct integration of the identified rising technology in the direction \u201cThe Role of the BSN Nurse in Selling Neighborhood Health.\u201d Or 1 or extra of the identified forces are unrealistic.<br \/>using the connected \u201cC922 Curriculum Know-how Proposal Template.\u201d<br \/>COMPETENT<br \/>The diagnosis contains 2 or extra internal and a pair of or extra exterior organizational factors that can every realistically facilitate or im<br \/>pede implementation.<br \/>COMPETENT<br \/>The description addresses 3 forces that can facilitate integra tion of the identified rising technology in the direction \u201cThe Role of the BSN Nurse in Selling Neighborhood Health,\u201d and each identified pressure is realistic.<br \/>COMPETENT<br \/>The description addresses 3 forces that can obstruct integra tion of the identified rising technology in the direction \u201cThe Role of the BSN Nurse in Selling Neighborhood Health,\u201d and each identified pressure is realistic.<br \/>D2:IDENTIFICATION OF CHANGE THEORY<br \/>NOT EVIDENT<br \/>A switch theory is no longer<br \/>identified.<br \/>D2A:JUSTIFICATION OF CHANGE THEORY<br \/>NOT EVIDENT<br \/>A justification of the switch the ory is no longer provided.<br \/>D2B:POTENTIAL RESISTANCE TO TECHNOLOGY<br \/>NOT EVIDENT<br \/>An outline of doable resis tance and barriers is no longer<br \/>provided.<br \/>D2C:PLANS TO IMPLEMENT CHANGE THEORY<br \/>NOT EVIDENT<br \/>The submission does no longer discuss a opinion.<br \/>APPROACHING<br \/>COMPETENCE<br \/>The switch theory identified is no longer linked to or is inappropri ate for the technology integra tion or adoption.<br \/>APPROACHING<br \/>COMPETENCE<br \/>The justification of the selected switch theory from piece D2 is no longer research-based totally mostly or does no longer consist of specific little print that sup port the justification.<br \/>APPROACHING<br \/>COMPETENCE<br \/>The description of doable re sistance and barriers to the technology switch is illogical or irrelevant to the technology switch.<br \/>APPROACHING<br \/>COMPETENCE<br \/>The submission discusses an il logical opinion to place into effect the switch theory identified in piece D2, or the dialogue is no longer effectively supported or is incorrect in de tail. Or the switch theory is dif ferent from the one identified in piece D2.<br \/>COMPETENT<br \/>The switch theory identified is expounded to and acceptable for the technology integration and adoption.<br \/>COMPETENT<br \/>The justification of the selected switch theory from piece D2 is re search-based totally mostly and contains spe cific little print that enhance the justification.<br \/>COMPETENT<br \/>The description of doable re sistance and barriers to the tech nology switch is logical and rele vant to the technology switch.<br \/>COMPETENT<br \/>The submission discusses a logi cal opinion to place into effect the switch theory identified in piece D2 with steady and effectively-supported ingredient.<\/p>\n<p>E1:PURPOSE OF PROPOSAL<\/p>\n<p>NOT EVIDENT<br \/>A dialogue of the explanation is<br \/>no longer provided.<br \/>E2:EXPLANATION OF PROPOSAL AND NEEDS GAP<br \/>NOT EVIDENT<br \/>An evidence of the proposal<br \/>is no longer provided.<br \/>E3:IMPORTANCE AND IMPACT OF PROPOSAL<br \/>NOT EVIDENT<br \/>A dialogue about implementa tion is no longer provided.<br \/>APPROACHING<br \/>COMPETENCE<br \/>The submission does no longer discuss the cause of the proposal, or the dialogue contains a poorly supported rationale. Or the dis cussion does no longer specialize in the affect or cause of the educated posal. Or the dialogue uses fully traditional examples when ex plaining the cause of the proposal.<br \/>APPROACHING<br \/>COMPETENCE<br \/>The explanation does no longer advert dress how the proposal will web the identified curriculum needs gap or is no longer supported with evi dence from the needs-gap diagnosis, or the proof is no longer linked to the needs-gap diagnosis.<br \/>APPROACHING<br \/>COMPETENCE<br \/>The dialogue does no longer address the importance of enforcing the proposal, or the dialogue does no longer provide details or logical reasoning about the affect the proposal can salvage on the broader field of nursing.<br \/>COMPETENT<br \/>The submission discusses the cause of the proposal and in cludes a effectively-supported rationale that makes a speciality of the affect and cause of the proposal. The dis cussion uses specific examples when explaining the cause of the proposal.<br \/>COMPETENT<br \/>The explanation addresses how the proposal will web the identified curriculum needs gap and is sup ported with proof from the needs-gap diagnosis.<br \/>COMPETENT<br \/>The dialogue addresses the sig nificance of enforcing the proposal and provides details and logical reasoning about the im pact the proposal can salvage on the broader field of nursing.<\/p>\n<p>F:SOURCES<\/p>\n<p>NOT EVIDENT<br \/>The submission does no longer consist of both in-textual snarl material citations and a ref erence list for sources which would maybe maybe be quoted, paraphrased, or<br \/>summarized.<br \/>G:PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATION<br \/>NOT EVIDENT<br \/>This submission contains perva sive errors in educated com munication linked to grammar, sentence fluency, contextual<br \/>spelling, or punctuation, nega tively impacting the educated quality and clarity of the writing. Explicit errors had been identi fied by Grammarly for Education below the Correctness<br \/>category.<br \/>APPROACHING<br \/>COMPETENCE<br \/>The submission contains in-textual snarl material citations for sources which would maybe maybe be quoted, paraphrased, or summa rized and a reference list; how ever, the citations or reference list is incomplete or incorrect.<br \/>APPROACHING<br \/>COMPETENCE<br \/>This submission contains sub stantial errors in educated communication linked to gram mar, sentence fluency, contex tual spelling, or punctuation. Explicit errors had been identi fied by Grammarly for Education below the Correctness<br \/>category.<br \/>COMPETENT<br \/>The submission contains in-textual snarl material citations for sources which would maybe maybe be properly quoted, paraphrased, or summarized and a reference list that precisely identifies the au thor, date, title, and provide loca tion as on hand.<br \/>COMPETENT<br \/>This submission contains satis factory exercise of grammar, sentence fluency, contextual spelling, and punctuation, which promote ac curate interpretation and working out.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>MKP3 \u2014 MKP3 TASK 1: EMERGING TECHNOLOGY AND NURSING EDUCATIONEMERGING TRENDS AND CHALLENGES IN 21ST CENTURY NURSING EDUCATION \u2014 C922 PRFA \u2014 MKP3Preparation Activity Overview Submissions Review RevealCOMPETENCIES7057.1.1 : Acknowledge Tutorial DevelopmentsThe learner acknowledges the affect of developments, significant challenges, and developments in academic technology in higher education in the twenty first century.7057.1.2 : Propose [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-31924","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-solutions"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/academicwritersbay.com\/solutions\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31924","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/academicwritersbay.com\/solutions\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/academicwritersbay.com\/solutions\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/academicwritersbay.com\/solutions\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/academicwritersbay.com\/solutions\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=31924"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/academicwritersbay.com\/solutions\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31924\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/academicwritersbay.com\/solutions\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=31924"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/academicwritersbay.com\/solutions\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=31924"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/academicwritersbay.com\/solutions\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=31924"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}