HI5031 Unswerving Points in IS Ethics and Notice Particular individual Assignment Particular individual Assignment Overview Particulars and Submission Pointers Trimester T1 2026 Unit Code HI5031 Unit Title Unswerving Points in IS Ethics and Notice Overview Form Particular individual Assignment Weight 50 % Observe restrict (if appropriate) 2500 phrases Submission Pointers All work must always tranquil be submitted on Blackboard by the due date along with a performed Assignment Duvet Web page. The assignment must always tranquil be in MS Observe structure until in another case specified. Academic Integrity Records Holmes Institute is committed to ensuring and upholding academic integrity. All assessments must modify to academic integrity guidelines. Please learn about academic integrity and consult your academics with any questions. Violating academic integrity is severe and punishable by penalties that differ from deduction of marks, failure of the analysis job or unit involving, suspension in fact enrolment, or cancellation in fact enrolment. Penalties All work must always tranquil be submitted on Blackboard by the due date and time, along with a performed Overview Duvet Web page. Unimaginative penalties apply. Your solutions must always tranquil be essentially based on Holmes Institute syllabus of this unit. Exterior sources may per chance per chance per chance furthermore no longer amount to better than 10% of any retort and must always tranquil be accurately referenced in plump. Over-reliance on open air sources may per chance per chance be penalised Reference sources must always tranquil be cited in the text of the document and listed accurately on the raze in a reference list the utilization of Holmes Institute Tailored Harvard Referencing. Penalties are linked to unsuitable citation and referencing. Particular individual Assignment Pointers and Specs HI5031 Unswerving Points in IS Ethics and Notice<\/p>\n
Particular individual Case Gaze Account \u2013 Submission Constructing<\/p>\n
Or no longer it is principal to put up the final version of your assignment in Week 5.<\/p>\n
Case Gaze Optus Recordsdata Breach, 2022<\/p>\n
Students must always tranquil spend the 2022 Optus records breach as basically the most principal case learn about. The breach uncovered the private records of thousands and thousands of Australian customers, including names, dates of birth, phone numbers, e-mail addresses, addresses, and identity document principal facets. The incident raised major concerns about cybersecurity governance, privateness protection, records administration, company accountability, and ethical responsibility.<\/p>\n
Case Gaze Topic Optus Recordsdata Breach: Privacy, Cybersecurity Governance, and Organisational Accountability<\/p>\n
Be taught the case learn about on the 2022 Optus records breach, then prepare a individual analytical document the utilization of the structure below.<\/p>\n
Assignment Directions On this analysis, you is doubtless to be required to seriously analyse the Optus records breach from a qualified, ethical, ethical, and organisational standpoint. Your document must always tranquil narrate your working out of recordsdata programs ethics, cybersecurity responsibility, knowledgeable conduct, privateness protection, and ethical decision-making.<\/p>\n
Your dialogue must always tranquil be supported by academic research and relevant knowledgeable sources.<\/p>\n
You have to per chance per chance furthermore must make spend of on the least ten quality references, including journal articles, cybersecurity standards, privateness guidelines, authorities or regulatory reviews, and knowledgeable codes of conduct.<\/p>\n
You have to per chance per chance furthermore must apply:<\/p>\n
one knowledgeable code of conduct, such as ACS, ACM, or IEEE; and on the least two ethical theories, such as utilitarianism, deontology, contract theory, or advantage ethics. Account Constructing<\/p>\n
Provide a temporary overview of the Optus records breach, basically the most principal cybersecurity and ethical issues, basically the most principal findings of your diagnosis, and basically the most principal suggestions.<\/p>\n
Immediate indicate the Optus records breach<\/p>\n
Title basically the most principal stakeholders fascinated with or laid low with the breach<\/p>\n
Analyse basically the most principal cybersecurity, privateness, and governance issues in the Optus case<\/p>\n
Select one knowledgeable code of conduct: ACS, ACM, or IEEE.<\/p>\n
Exercise the chosen code to analyse the responsibilities of:<\/p>\n
Optus leadership; IT and cybersecurity consultants; records governance and privateness officers; workers accountable for going through buyer records. Your diagnosis must always tranquil own in tips knowledgeable tasks such as:<\/p>\n
acting in the final public passion; preserving privateness and confidentiality; asserting knowledgeable competence; ensuring security of recordsdata programs; being simply and clear; accepting accountability for knowledgeable choices. 6. Ethical Opinion Utility \u2014 500 phrases<\/p>\n
Apply on the least two ethical theories to the Optus records breach. You have to per chance per chance furthermore prefer from:<\/p>\n
Utilitarianism \u2014 evaluating total grief and relief to customers, Optus, regulators, and society; Deontology \u2014 assessing tasks and duties to give protection to buyer records no topic commerce mark; Contract theory \u2014 analyzing the have confidence relationship between Optus and its customers; Advantage ethics \u2014 evaluating whether or no longer Optus demonstrated integrity, responsibility, honesty, and care. Point out how these theories help own in tips the selections and actions of Optus, its workers, regulators, and totally different relevant stakeholders.<\/p>\n
Focus on the ethical and regulatory implications of the Optus records breach<\/p>\n
Provide practical and justified suggestions for combating the same incidents and bettering ethical organisational practice.<\/p>\n
Summarise your total findings and indicate why the Optus records breach is a in actuality principal case for working out privateness protection, cybersecurity ethics, knowledgeable responsibility, and organisational accountability in records programs practice.<\/p>\n
Exercise Tailored Harvard referencing model.<\/p>\n
All references must always tranquil be cited in-text in the physique of your document. You have to per chance per chance furthermore must incorporate on the least ten quality academic or knowledgeable references.<\/p>\n
Valuable Notes Observe Count: 2500 phrases, excluding references. Submission Format: Single MS Observe document. Set no longer put up as PDF or Pages. Headings, citations, references, and appendices plot no longer count in direction of the word restrict. Student Overview Quotation and Referencing Tips Tailored Harvard Referencing Tips<\/p>\n
Holmes has implemented a revised Harvard option to referencing. The next guidelines apply:<\/p>\n
Reference sources in assignments are restricted to sources that provide plump-text bring together staunch of entry to to the source’s dispute material for lecturers and markers. The reference list must always tranquil be situated on a separate page on the raze of the essay and titled: “References”. The reference list must encompass the principal facets of the total in-text citations, organized A-Z alphabetically by author surname with every reference numbered (1 to 10, and so forth.) and every reference MUST encompass a hyperlink to the plump text of the cited reference source. As an illustration:<\/p>\n
(Hawking et al., 2004, p3(4))<\/p>\n
paragraph<\/p>\n
Non-Adherence to Referencing Tips The set college students plot no longer apply the above guidelines:<\/p>\n
For faculty students who put up assignments that plot no longer modify to the guidelines, a 10% penalty may per chance per chance be applied. As per the Student Instruction handbook, unhurried penalties will apply on day by day foundation after the coed\/s has been notified of the due date. Students who modify to guidelines and the citations are “unsuitable” is doubtless to be reported for academic misconduct. HI5031 Particular individual Assignment T1 2026 Marking Criteria and Rubric:<\/p>\n
Criteria HD (80-100%) DI (70-Seventy nine%) CR (60-69%) PS (50-59%) FL (0-49%) Account Quality – Introduction and Conclusion – 10 Marks Professionally presented and suitably structured document. Amazing Introduction and conclusion. Very Appropriate presentation and proper structure. Appropriate Introduction and conclusion. Appropriate presentation and structure with minor errors. Introduction and Conclusion need development. Appropriate document structure and presentation. Overall introduction and conclusion supplied. Unlucky document presentation. Unlucky\/no introduction and Unlucky\/no conclusion. Identification of Ethical Plight – 15 Marks Amazing and precise dialogue facets addressing ethical jam. Very correct dialogue facets addressing ethical jam. Appropriate dialogue facets addressing ethical jam. Enough dialogue facets addressing ethical jam. Inadequate dialogue facets. Identification of Other issues – 20 Marks Amazing identification of issues and justified with academic references. Very correct identification of issues and justified with academic references. Appropriate identification of issues and justified with some academic references. Enough identification of issues and justified with few academic references. Has no longer recognized issues accurately. Restricted academic references. Prognosis of the Actions of the CEO – Code of Ethics – 15 Marks Comprehensive diagnosis of the actions of the CEO of Colonial Pipeline from the standpoint of a Appropriate Code of Ethics. Enough diagnosis of the actions of the CEO of Colonial Pipeline from the standpoint of a Appropriate Code of Ethics. Makes an real strive to analyse the actions of the CEO of Colonial Pipeline from the standpoint of a Appropriate Code of Ethics. Realistic diagnosis of the actions of the CEO of Colonial Pipeline from the standpoint of a Appropriate Code of Ethics. Incorrect response to analyse the actions of the CEO of Colonial Pipeline from the standpoint of a Appropriate Code of Ethics. Prognosis of the numerous issues – Classical Ethical Theories – 20 Marks All relevant ethical theories are accurately applied to the ethical scenario\/issues being analysed. Reasons and objections are accurately presented. All relevant ethical theories are mostly accurately applied. Reasons and objections are mostly accurately presented. Minor omissions most efficient. Makes an real strive at making spend of the ethical theories to the diagnosis of the ethical scenario\/issues. The ethical theories plot no longer link successfully with the diagnosis of the ethical scenario\/issues presented. The ethical theories are inadequately or inappropriately applied to the diagnosis of the ethical scenario\/issues presented. Ideas & Justifications – 10 Marks Amazing, relevant and logical Ideas with Appropriate justification. Very correct and relevant Ideas with correct justification. Appropriate Ideas however no longer logical however with some justifications. Enough and partially relevant suggestions and usual justification. Inadequate and non relevant suggestions and heart-broken justification. Referencing – 10 Marks Excessive Quality Academic sources used (Proquest). Appropriately referenced the utilization of the Holmes Tailored Harvard model, both in-text and entire-text. Appropriate Quality Academic sources used (Research Gate, Google Student and so forth). Referenced the utilization of the Holmes Tailored Harvard model, both in-text and entire-text. Minor errors. A aggregate of Appropriate Quality sources (Academic, Web and Overall). Referenced the utilization of the Holmes Tailored Harvard model, both in-text and entire-text. Minor errors. A aggregate of Appropriate Quality sources (Academic, Web and Overall). Referenced the utilization of the Holmes Tailored Harvard model, both in-text and entire-text. Predominant errors. No Academic or Credible sources used. No longer referenced accordingly the utilization of the Holmes Tailored Harvard model, both in-text and entire-text.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
HI5031 Unswerving Points in IS Ethics and Notice Particular individual Assignment Particular individual Assignment Overview Particulars and Submission Pointers Trimester T1 2026 Unit Code HI5031 Unit Title Unswerving Points in IS Ethics and Notice Overview Form Particular individual Assignment Weight 50 % Observe restrict (if appropriate) 2500 phrases Submission Pointers All work must always tranquil […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-32468","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-solutions"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/academicwritersbay.com\/solutions\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32468","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/academicwritersbay.com\/solutions\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/academicwritersbay.com\/solutions\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/academicwritersbay.com\/solutions\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/academicwritersbay.com\/solutions\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=32468"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/academicwritersbay.com\/solutions\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32468\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/academicwritersbay.com\/solutions\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=32468"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/academicwritersbay.com\/solutions\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=32468"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/academicwritersbay.com\/solutions\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=32468"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}