{"id":33349,"date":"2026-08-16T04:03:27","date_gmt":"2026-08-16T04:03:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/academicwritersbay.com\/solutions\/make-a-choice-one-in-all-the-2-cases-that-werent-assigned-to-your-tiny-crew-to-illustrate-in-case-your-crew-used-to-be-assigned-to-jordan-please-decide-out-maria-from-the-rivera-household-or-marcu\/"},"modified":"2026-08-16T04:03:27","modified_gmt":"2026-08-16T04:03:27","slug":"make-a-choice-one-in-all-the-2-cases-that-werent-assigned-to-your-tiny-crew-to-illustrate-in-case-your-crew-used-to-be-assigned-to-jordan-please-decide-out-maria-from-the-rivera-household-or-marcu","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/academicwritersbay.com\/solutions\/make-a-choice-one-in-all-the-2-cases-that-werent-assigned-to-your-tiny-crew-to-illustrate-in-case-your-crew-used-to-be-assigned-to-jordan-please-decide-out-maria-from-the-rivera-household-or-marcu\/","title":{"rendered":"Make a choice one in all the 2 cases that weren&#8217;t assigned to your tiny crew. To illustrate, in case your crew used to be assigned to Jordan, please decide out Maria from the Rivera Household or Marcus. Closely evaluation the case be taught about and accept as true with a genogram"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Step 1: Genogram<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Make a choice one in all the 2 cases that weren&#8217;t assigned to your tiny crew. To illustrate, in case your crew used to be assigned to Jordan, please decide out Maria from the Rivera Household or Marcus.<\/li>\n<li>Closely evaluation the case be taught about and accept as true with a genogram.<\/li>\n<li>Add the genogram.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Step 2: Ecomap<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>The use of the same case as Step 1, accept as true with and add a accomplished ecomap.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Step 3: Initial Insights<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>In 150 words or less, temporarily characterize essentially the most critical highlights out of your genogram.<\/li>\n<li>In 150 words or less, temporarily characterize essentially the most critical highlights out of your ecomap.<\/li>\n<li>Name no decrease than three concerns based on what you identified within the genogram.<\/li>\n<li>Name no decrease than three concerns based on what you identified within the ecomap.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Step 4: Theoretical Framework<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Make a choice one in all the theories which have been presented in this course and characterize in 150 words or less how the theory explains what you peek for your genogram and ecomap.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Step 5: Overview<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>List no decrease than five evaluation questions that are right this moment linked to your genogram.<\/li>\n<li>For every evaluation ask that came out of your genogram, characterize your rationale for asking it in 2-3 sentences.<\/li>\n<li>List no decrease than five evaluation questions that are right this moment linked to your ecomap.<\/li>\n<li>For every evaluation ask that came out of your ecomap, characterize your rationale for asking it in 2-3 sentences.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Endure in thoughts<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Encompass no decrease than three credible references.<\/li>\n<li>Encompass in-text citations that conform to APA Model.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2 id=\"rubric\">Rubric<\/h2>\n<p><strong>MSW544_W6_Assignment Rubric<\/strong>MSW544_W6_Assignment RubricCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Studying OutcomeStep 1: Genogram<strong>25<\/strong> <strong>ptsExcellentThe genogram is whole, factual, clearly labeled, and reflects a deep working out of household building and relationships.20<\/strong> <strong>ptsSatisfactoryThe genogram is mostly whole and factual with minor labeling or structural concerns.12.5<\/strong> <strong>ptsNeeds ImprovementThe genogram is partially whole or contains quite a lot of inaccuracies or unclear functions.0<\/strong> <strong>ptsUnsatisfactoryThe genogram is missing, incomplete, or lacks readability and accuracy.<\/strong>25 pts<br \/>This criterion is linked to a Studying OutcomeStep 2: Ecomap<strong>25<\/strong> <strong>ptsExcellentThe ecomap is whole, visually determined, and precisely represents the customer\u2019s ecological programs and relationships.20<\/strong> <strong>ptsSatisfactoryThe ecomap is mostly whole, with only a couple of minor omissions or unclear connections.12.5<\/strong> <strong>ptsNeeds ImprovementThe ecomap is partially whole or lacks readability in representing programs.0<\/strong> <strong>ptsUnsatisfactoryThe ecomap is missing, incomplete, or does no longer be pleased ecological programs precisely.<\/strong>25 pts<br \/>This criterion is linked to a Studying OutcomeStep 3: Initial Insights<strong>20<\/strong> <strong>ptsExcellentInsightful, concise summaries of genogram and ecomap. Identifies three or extra relevant concerns for each.15<\/strong> <strong>ptsSatisfactorySummaries are determined and mostly insightful. Identifies three concerns for each with minor elaboration wished.10<\/strong> <strong>ptsNeeds ImprovementSummaries are vague or overly immediate. Identifies fewer than three concerns or lacks depth.0<\/strong> <strong>ptsUnsatisfactorySummaries are missing, unclear, or discontinue no longer establish relevant concerns.<\/strong>20 pts<br \/>This criterion is linked to a Studying OutcomeStep 4: Theoretical Framework<strong>20<\/strong> <strong>ptsExcellentThe theory is clearly and precisely utilized to both the genogram and ecomap. The clarification is concise and well-built-in.15<\/strong> <strong>ptsSatisfactoryThe theory is mostly factual and relevant. The clarification is clear however may well maybe well additionally lack depth or integration.10<\/strong> <strong>ptsNeeds ImprovementThe theory is mentioned however no longer clearly utilized or lacks relevance to the case.0<\/strong> <strong>ptsUnsatisfactoryTheory is missing, wrong, or no longer connected to the genogram or ecomap.<\/strong>20 pts<br \/>This criterion is linked to a Studying OutcomeStep 5: Overview<strong>20<\/strong> <strong>ptsExcellentAt least five thoughtful, relevant questions for each tool, with a solid rationale provided for each.15<\/strong> <strong>ptsSatisfactoryAt least five questions for each tool with a mostly determined rationale.10<\/strong> <strong>ptsNeeds ImprovementFewer than five questions or rationales are vague or underdeveloped.0<\/strong> <strong>ptsUnsatisfactoryQuestions are missing, unclear, or lack rationale.<\/strong>20 pts<br \/>This criterion is linked to a Studying OutcomeFormat1. Acknowledge all questions with clarification and detail.<br \/>2. Encompass no decrease than three initiate air, credible, and relevant sources.<br \/>3. Encompass in-text citations.<strong>20<\/strong> <strong>ptsExcellentAll necessities met.15<\/strong> <strong>ptsSatisfactory2 necessities met.0<\/strong> <strong>ptsUnsatisfactory1 requirement met.<\/strong>20 pts<br \/>This criterion is linked to a Studying OutcomeCitation and Reference FormationUse essentially the latest APA Model requirements to layout citations and references freed from errors.<strong>10<\/strong> <strong>ptsExcellent0-1 errors.8<\/strong> <strong>ptsSatisfactory4-5 errors.5<\/strong> <strong>ptsNeeds Improvement6-7 errors.0<\/strong> <strong>ptsUnsatisfactoryMore than 7 errors.<\/strong>10 pts<br \/>This criterion is linked to a Studying OutcomeWriting RequirementsCommunicate with minimal English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation errors.<strong>10<\/strong> <strong>ptsExcellent0-1 errors.8<\/strong> <strong>ptsSatisfactory4-5 errors.5<\/strong> <strong>ptsNeeds Improvement6-7 errors.0<\/strong> <strong>ptsUnsatisfactoryMore than 7 errors.<\/strong>10 pts<br \/>This criterion is linked to a Studying OutcomeLate Deduction<strong>0<\/strong> <strong>ptsNo Parts DeductedSubmitted on time0<\/strong> <strong>ptsPoints DeductedNot Submitted on Time &#8211; Parts Deducted (5% deduction per day)<\/strong>0 pts<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Step 1: Genogram Make a choice one in all the 2 cases that weren&#8217;t assigned to your tiny crew. To illustrate, in case your crew used to be assigned to Jordan, please decide out Maria from the Rivera Household or Marcus. Closely evaluation the case be taught about and accept as true with a genogram. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-33349","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-solutions"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/academicwritersbay.com\/solutions\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33349","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/academicwritersbay.com\/solutions\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/academicwritersbay.com\/solutions\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/academicwritersbay.com\/solutions\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/academicwritersbay.com\/solutions\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=33349"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/academicwritersbay.com\/solutions\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33349\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/academicwritersbay.com\/solutions\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=33349"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/academicwritersbay.com\/solutions\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=33349"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/academicwritersbay.com\/solutions\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=33349"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}