Your quest to aquire a peculiar automotive begins with an identification of the factors crucial to you. As you conduct a search of autos that rate high on these factors, you earn evidence and are trying to adore the extent of that evidence. A document that implies a undeniable produce and model of automotive has high mileage is encouraging. But who produced that document? How unswerving is it? How used to be the records composed, and what used to be the sample size?
On this Project, you have to presumably possibly delve deeper into clinical inquiry by intently inspecting your PICO(T) ask. You also start as a lot as analyze the evidence you have to presumably possibly presumably also merely accept as true with composed.
Sources
-
MOD3ASSIGNMENT.docx
· Parts 100
· Submitting a textual grunt entry field or a file upload
· Attempts 0
· Allowed Attempts 2
Support to Module at a Leer
Proof-Essentially based totally Conducting, Portion 2: Developed Ranges of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Studies
Your quest to aquire a peculiar automotive begins with an identification of the factors crucial to you. As you conduct a search of autos that rate high on these factors, you earn evidence and are trying to adore the extent of that evidence. A document that implies a undeniable produce and model of automotive has high mileage is encouraging. But who produced that document? How unswerving is it? How used to be the records composed, and what used to be the sample size?
On this Project, you have to presumably possibly delve deeper into clinical inquiry by intently inspecting your PICO(T) ask. You also start as a lot as analyze the evidence you have to presumably possibly presumably also merely accept as true with composed.
Sources
Acquire sure that to study the Finding out Sources sooner than ending this instruct. Click on the weekly resources link to earn admission to the resources.
WEEKLY RESOURCES
To Prepare:
· Overview the Sources and title a clinical bid of hobby that can invent the premise of a clinical inquiry.
· Make a PICO(T) ask to take care of the clinical bid of hobby you acknowledged in Module 2 for the Project. This PICOT ask will dwell the identical for all of the course.
· Use basically the most important words from the PICO(T) ask you developed and search no longer no longer as a lot as four numerous databases within the Walden Library. Title no longer no longer as a lot as four related systematic experiences or other filtered high-level evidence, which incorporates meta-analyses, significantly-appraised issues (evidence syntheses), significantly-appraised particular individual articles (article synopses). The evidence will no longer necessarily take care of your total parts of your PICO(T) ask, so select the ultimate ideas to breeze searching and accumulate basically the most efficient evidence available.
· Replicate on the course of of increasing a PICO(T) ask and skimming for mediate about-reviewed research.
The Project (Proof-Essentially based totally Conducting)
Portion 2: Developed Ranges of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Studies
Make a 6- to 7-traipse PowerPoint presentation in which you are making the following:
· Title and in transient checklist your chosen clinical bid of hobby.
· Describe the model you developed a PICO(T) ask centered to your chosen clinical bid of hobby.
· Title the four research databases that you aged to conduct your scrutinize for the mediate about-reviewed articles you chosen.
· Present APA citations of the four related mediate about-reviewed articles on the systematic-experiences level related to your research ask. If there are no systematic review level articles or meta-diagnosis to your subject, then instruct the ultimate level of evidence mediate about reviewed article.
· Describe the ranges of evidence in every of the four mediate about-reviewed articles you chosen, including an clarification of the strengths of the instruct of systematic experiences for clinical research. Be converse and offer examples.
By Day 7 of Week 5
Submit Portion 2 of your Proof-Essentially based totally Conducting.
submission files
Sooner than submitting your closing project, you have to presumably possibly presumably test your draft for authenticity. To test your draft, earn admission to the Turnitin Drafts from the Originate Here attach.
1. To post your done project, attach your Project as MD3Assgn+final title+first initial
2. Then, click on on Originate Project shut to the head of the page.
3. Subsequent, click on on Add File and select Submit Project for review.
Rubric
NURS_6052_Module03_Week05_Assignment_Rubric
|
NURS_6052_Module03_Week05_Assignment_Rubric |
||
|
Requirements |
Ratings |
Pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Finding out OutcomePart 2: Developed Ranges of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Studies Make a 6- to 7-traipse PowerPoint presentation in which you are making the following: · Title and in transient checklist your chosen clinical bid of hobby. · Describe the model you developed a PICO(T) ask centered to your chosen clinical bid of hobby. · Title the four research databases that you aged to conduct your scrutinize for the mediate about-reviewed articles you chosen. · Describe the ranges of evidence in every of the four mediate about-reviewed articles you chosen, including an clarification of the strengths of the instruct of systematic experiences for clinical research. Be converse and offer examples. |
80 to >71.0 ptsExcellentThe presentation clearly and precisely identifies and describes intimately the chosen clinical bid of hobby. …The presentation clearly and precisely describes intimately the developed PICO(T) ask. …The presentation clearly and precisely identifies four or more research databases aged to conduct a scrutinize for the mediate about-reviewed articles chosen. …The presentation involves converse and related examples that totally enhance the research. …The presentation affords a total, detailed, and right synthesis of two outside resources related to the mediate about-reviewed articles chosen, and totally integrates no longer no longer as a lot as 2 outside resources and two or three course-converse resources that totally enhance the presentation. 71 to >63.0 ptsGoodThe presentation precisely identifies and describes the chosen clinical bid of hobby. …The presentation precisely describes the developed PICO(T) ask centered on the chosen clinical bid of hobby. …The presentation precisely identifies no longer no longer as a lot as four research databases aged to conduct a scrutinize for the mediate about-reviewed articles chosen. …The presentation involves related examples that enhance the research presented. 63 to >55.0 ptsFairThe presentation inaccurately or vaguely identifies and describes the chosen clinical bid of hobby. …The presentation inaccurately or vaguely describes the developed PICO(T) ask centered on the chosen clinical bid of hobby. …The presentation inaccurately or vaguely identifies no longer no longer as a lot as four research databases aged to conduct a scrutinize for the mediate about-reviewed articles chosen. …The presentation involves inaccurate or imprecise examples to enhance the research presented. 55 to >0 ptsPoorThe presentation inaccurately and vaguely identifies and describes the chosen clinical bid of hobby or is missing. …The presentation inaccurately and vaguely describes the developed PICO(T) ask or is missing. …The presentation inaccurately and vaguely identifies no longer as a lot as four research databases aged to conduct a scrutinize for the mediate about-reviewed articles chosen or is missing. …The presentation involves inaccurate and imprecise examples to enhance the research presented or is missing. |
80 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Finding out OutcomeResource Synthesis |
5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentThe instruct of correct in-textual grunt citations, the presentation clearly and precisely affords no longer no longer as a lot as four mediate about-reviewed systematic review kind articles chosen, describes the ranges of evidence in every of the four articles chosen, including a thorough and detailed clarification of the strengths of the instruct of systematic experiences for clinical research. 4 to >3.0 ptsGoodThe instruct of correct in-textual grunt citations, the presentation precisely affords no longer no longer as a lot as four systematic review kind mediate about-reviewed articles chosen including enough clarification of the ranges of evidence, the strengths of the instruct of a systematic review for 3 to >2.0 ptsFairThe instruct of correct in-textual grunt citations, the presentation affords a imprecise or inaccurate synthesis or outside resources related to the systematic review kind mediate about-reviewed articles chosen. The response minimally explains the ranges of evidence and the strengths of the instruct of a systematic review and/or minimally integrates resources that could presumably possibly also merely enhance the presentation. 2 to >0 ptsPoorThe presentation affords a imprecise and inaccurate synthesis of no outside resources related to the articles chosen and fails to integrate any resources to enhance the presentation or is missing. |
5 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Finding out OutcomeResource FormattingAppropriate mediate about-reviewed articles are incorporated and citations instruct APA structure. |
5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentPresentation involves 4 or more mediate about-reviewed articles chosen the instruct of systematic experiences for clinical research. …Citations instruct right APA structure with out a errors. 4 to >3.0 ptsGoodPresentation involves 3 mediate about-reviewed articles chosen the instruct of systematic experiences for clinical research. …Citations instruct right APA structure with few (1-2) errors. 3 to >2.0 ptsFairPresentation involves 2 mediate about-reviewed articles chosen the instruct of systematic experiences for clinical research. …Citations hold several (3-4) APA structure errors. 2 to >0 ptsPoorPresentation involves 1 or no resources. … Citations hold many >5 APA structure errors. |
5 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Finding out OutcomePowerPoint Presentation:The presentation is expert; photos are precisely attributed; photos are sure. The presentation textual grunt is readable. Presentation flows successfully and is presented in a logical elaborate. |
5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentThe presentation is expert; photos are precisely attributed; photos are sure. The presentation textual grunt is readable. Presentation flows successfully and is presented in a logical elaborate. 4 to >3.0 ptsGoodEighty percent of the presentation is expert; photos are precisely attributed; photos are sure. The presentation textual grunt is readable. Presentation flows successfully and is presented in a logical elaborate. 3 to >2.0 ptsFairSixty to seventy nine percent of the presentation follows these pointers: presentation is expert; photos are precisely attributed; photos are sure. The presentation textual grunt is readable. Presentation flows successfully and is presented in a logical elaborate. 2 to >0 ptsPoorMuch less than sixty percent of the presentation follows these pointers: presentation is expert; photos are precisely attributed; photos are sure. The presentation textual grunt is readable. Presentation flows successfully and is presented in a logical elaborate. |
5 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Finding out OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—English Writing Requirements:Real grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation. |
5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentMakes instruct of right grammar, spelling, and punctuation with out a errors. 4 to >3.0 ptsGoodContains a pair of (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 3 to >2.0 ptsFairContains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 2 to >0 ptsPoorContains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that intervene with the reader’s notion. |
5 pts |
Total Parts: 100
Outdated
Subsequent
- WE OFFER THE BEST CUSTOM PAPER WRITING SERVICES. WE HAVE DONE THIS QUESTION BEFORE, WE CAN ALSO DO IT FOR YOU.
- Assignment status: Already Solved By Our Experts
- (USA, AUS, UK & CA PhD. Writers)
- CLICK HERE TO GET A PROFESSIONAL WRITER TO WORK ON THIS PAPER AND OTHER SIMILAR PAPERS, GET A NON PLAGIARIZED PAPER FROM OUR EXPERTS
QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPER – NO ChatGPT.NO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER
Looking for unparalleled custom paper writing services? Our team of experienced professionals at AcademicWritersBay.com is here to provide you with top-notch assistance that caters to your unique needs.
We understand the importance of producing original, high-quality papers that reflect your personal voice and meet the rigorous standards of academia. That’s why we assure you that our work is completely plagiarism-free—we craft bespoke solutions tailored exclusively for you.
Why Choose AcademicWritersBay.com?
- Our papers are 100% original, custom-written from scratch.
- We’re here to support you around the clock, any day of the year.
- You’ll find our prices competitive and reasonable.
- We handle papers across all subjects, regardless of urgency or difficulty.
- Need a paper urgently? We can deliver within 6 hours!
- Relax with our on-time delivery commitment.
- We offer money-back and privacy guarantees to ensure your satisfaction and confidentiality.
- Benefit from unlimited amendments upon request to get the paper you envisioned.
- We pledge our dedication to meeting your expectations and achieving the grade you deserve.
Our Process: Getting started with us is as simple as can be. Here’s how to do it:
- Click on the “Place Your Order” tab at the top or the “Order Now” button at the bottom. You’ll be directed to our order form.
- Provide the specifics of your paper in the “PAPER DETAILS” section.
- Select your academic level, the deadline, and the required number of pages.
- Click on “CREATE ACCOUNT & SIGN IN” to provide your registration details, then “PROCEED TO CHECKOUT.”
- Follow the simple payment instructions and soon, our writers will be hard at work on your paper.
AcademicWritersBay.com is dedicated to expediting the writing process without compromising on quality. Our roster of writers boasts individuals with advanced degrees—Masters and PhDs—in a myriad of disciplines, ensuring that no matter the complexity or field of your assignment, we have the expertise to tackle it with finesse. Our quick turnover doesn’t mean rushed work; it means efficiency and priority handling, ensuring your deadlines are met with the excellence your academics demand.
