(Q) Benefits of accepting the proposed change.

Prepare a 3-4 page proposal for a new software system that explains the forces driving the change, the ethical considerations behind the proposed change, the risks to the organization of not accepting the proposed change, and the benefits of accepting the proposed change.IntroductionOrganizations, such as the Joint Commission and the National Committee for Quality Assurance, collect and report extensive data on quality indicators used by the industry, government, and consumers. The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), passed by Congress in 1996, protects the privacy and confidentiality of patient health records. The Office for Civil Rights (OCR) of the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services oversees this compliance and offers comprehensive support and guidance for health care leaders and organizations.The use of health information technology and electronic health records continues to improve quality of care indicators and offer expanding career opportunities in the health care field. However, keeping abreast of rapid advancements in technology (for both management and clinical applications), along with their ethical implications, demands increased time and attention from health care operations managers. The consequences of data security breaches can be detrimental in legal costs and loss of reputation and trust within the industry and community.PreparationImagine that you work in a mid-sized clinic that is well established, having been in operation for over 25 years. The physicians who practice in the clinic have been doing so for the same length of time, although several younger physicians have recently joined. You have been trying to get the physicians to upgrade the outdated health information technology (HIT) system for the practice. There have been reports of compromised patient information from other organizations using the same software. Complaints have been increasing from other health facilities and insurance companies that the software is not compatible with their electronic health records (EHR) systems. This compromises efficient and confidential sharing of patient information. Patients have expressed dissatisfaction that the practice does not offer a patient portal to allow them direct access to their records and information and to self-scheduling features. You feel that a personal health record (PHR) would meet the patients’ need as well as alleviate a lot of extra work for the staff. The office and administrative staff are increasingly frustrated, as they understand how much of their daily workload duties and flow could be improved with an entirely new system. The physicians have been resistant to change the system because it will require extensive time and money to integrate. Although it is obvious that there are multiple ethical concerns present, they are uncomfortable with managing such a large change in the practice, especially in training themselves and the staff on how to use it effectively and efficiently.You just received a notice from the software company informing you that by the end of the year, they will no longer support that software. The company is also offering a significant discount to upgrade to their latest software system. You must convince the group of physicians that the time to upgrade is now, but you need to position a proposal in a way that will show them the risks of not taking action.For this assessment, you do not need to research or recommend any type of software. Rather, your task is to explain why the new software is needed in terms of the driving forces, the ethical principles involved, the risks associated with not accepting your proposal, and how the upgrade will benefit the entire organization.Research federal regulations around the use of technology and data, HIPAA, and probable consequences should patient information be hacked. (The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office for Civil Rights identifies real cases of HIPAA violations on its Web site.) Find at least three authoritative resources to use as support for your proposal.Structure this assessment in a clear, logical order, using headings and subheadings as appropriate. Follow APA guidelines for citing and referencing your resources. Include a title page and references page.InstructionsPrepare a proposal for the implementation of a new electronic patient health record system. In your proposal, complete the following:Explain the external forces that are driving the proposal. (Hint: federal regulations are not the only forces you should consider.)Explain the ethical considerations that are driving the proposal.Describe the risks and their associated ethical challenges related to not accepting the proposal. (Hint: there are many risks here. Be sure you consider the risks from multiple perspectives.)Explain how the proposed change will benefit and ensure ethical integrity for the organization, employees, and patients.

Ethical theories and principles provide a framework for healthcare organizations to consider when making decisions that impact their operations. Healthcare management is tasked with providing quality care while working within the limits of ethical standard, applicable laws, and organizational mission statement. The most commonly used ethical frameworks in healthcare are utilitarianism, deontology, virtue ethics, justice theory, and nonmaleficence. Utilitarianism looks at an action’s outcome as it relates to overall benefit or harm; deontology focuses on following moral obligations; virtue ethics encourages moral behavior based on virtues; justice theory enforces equity between groups; and nonmaleficence promotes doing no harm through prevention or intervention. These core elements inform the way healthcare administrators develop policies and practices to make sure they are ethically sound while also meeting their organizational objectives.

bellum (Begby et al (2006b), Page 314). Frowe, notwithstanding, contends the possibility of “worthwhile motivation” in light of “Sway” which alludes to the security of political and regional freedoms, alongside common liberties. In contemporary view, this view is more convoluted to reply, given the ascent of globalization. Likewise, it is challenging to quantify proportionality, especially in war, on the grounds that not just that there is an epistemic issue in ascertaining, yet again the present world has created (Frowe (2011), Page 54-6). Moreover, Vittola contends war is fundamental, not just for protective purposes, ‘since it is legal to oppose force with force,’ yet additionally to battle against the vile, a hostile conflict, countries which are not rebuffed for acting unreasonably towards its own kin or have treacherously taken land from the home country (Begby et al (2006b), Page 310&313); to “show its foes a thing or two,” however principally to accomplish the point of war. This approves Aristotle’s contention: ‘there should be battle for harmony (Aristotle (1996), Page 187). In any case, Frowe contends “self-protection” has a majority of portrayals, found in Section 1, demonstrating the way that self-preservation can’t necessarily legitimize one’s activities. Much more tricky, is the situation of self-preservation in war, where two clashing perspectives are laid out: The Collectivists, an entirely different hypothesis and the Individualists, the continuation of the homegrown hypothesis of self-protection (Frowe (2011), Page 9& 29-34). All the more significantly, Frowe discredits Vittola’s view on retaliation in light of the fact that first and foremost it engages the punisher’s position, yet additionally the present world forestalls this activity between nations through legitimate bodies like the UN, since we have modernized into a moderately tranquil society (Frowe (2011), Page 80-1). In particular, Frowe further discredits Vittola through his case that ‘right aim can’t be blamed so as to take up arms in light of expected wrong,’ recommending we can’t simply hurt another in light of the fact that they have accomplished something low. Different variables should be thought of, for instance, Proportionality. Thirdly, Vittola contends that war ought to be kept away from (Begby et al (2006b), Page 332) and that we ought to continue conditions carefully. This is upheld by the “final retreat” position in Frowe, where war ought not be allowed except if all actions to look for discretion fizzles (Frowe (2011), Page 62). This implies war ought not be announced until one party must choose the option to proclaim battle, to safeguard its region and freedoms, the point of war. Nonetheless, we can likewise contend that the conflict can never be the final retreat, considering there is dependably a method for attempting to stay away from it, similar to assents or conciliation, showing Vittola’s hypothesis is defective. Fourthly, Vittola inquiries upon whose authority can request a formal statement of war, where he infers any republic can do battle, yet more critically, “the ruler” where he has “the regular request” as per Augustine, and all authority is given to him. This is additionally upheld by Aristotle’s Legislative issues ((1996), Page 28): ‘a ruler is the normal prevalent of his subjects.’ Be that as it may, he truly does later stress to place all confidence in the sovereign is off-base and has outcomes; a careful assessment of the reason for war is>
GET ANSWER

Share on Facebook

Tweet

Follow us

• WE OFFER THE BEST CUSTOM PAPER WRITING SERVICES. WE HAVE DONE THIS QUESTION BEFORE, WE CAN ALSO DO IT FOR YOU.
• Assignment status: Already Solved By Our Experts
• (USA, AUS, UK & CA PhD. Writers)
• CLICK HERE TO GET A PROFESSIONAL WRITER TO WORK ON THIS PAPER AND OTHER SIMILAR PAPERS, GET A NON PLAGIARIZED PAPER FROM OUR EXPERTS

QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPER – NO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER

Why Choose Us?

How It Works

• Click on the “Place Your Order” tab at the top menu or “Order Now” icon at the bottom and a new page will appear with an order form to be filled.
• Fill in your paper’s requirements in the “PAPER DETAILS” section.
• Fill in your paper’s academic level, deadline, and the required number of pages from the drop-down menus.
• Click “CREATE ACCOUNT & SIGN IN” to enter your registration details and get an account with us for record-keeping and then, click on “PROCEED TO CHECKOUT” at the bottom of the page.
• From there, the payment sections will show, follow the guided payment process and your order will be available for our writing team to work on it.

About AcademicWritersBay.com

AcademicWritersBay.com is an easy-to-use and reliable service that is ready to assist you with your papers 24/7/ 365days a year. 99% of our customers are happy with their papers. Our team is efficient and will always tackle your essay needs comprehensively assuring you of excellent results. Feel free to ask them anything concerning your essay demands or Order.

AcademicWritersBay.com is a private company that offers academic support and assistance to students at all levels. Our mission is to provide proficient and high quality academic services to our highly esteemed clients. AcademicWritersBay.com is equipped with competent and proficient writers to tackle all types of your academic needs, and provide you with excellent results. Most of our writers are holders of master’s degrees or PhDs, which is an surety of excellent results to our clients. We provide assistance to students all over the world.
We provide high quality term papers, research papers, essays, proposals, theses and many others. At AcademicWritersBay.com, you can be sure of excellent grades in your assignments and final exams.