(Mt) – I nedd help with mh assignment…it is due in 8 hours .i have a draft fot yoh to use

Law303 Taxation Law Major Assignment Richard Kouchoo richard_kouchoo@optusnet.com.au Elite Education Institute (CRICOS Provider Code: 03390A). All rights reserved. Students will submit a short answer or essay style answer (1,350 – 1,650 words, excluding footnotes and bibliography) reflecting on principles of taxation in relation to a factual problem applying relevant statutory principles and cases and providing any appropriate philosophical background for the answer. Question Carla is a business woman and she is very busy contributing to several businesses and companies. Carla is a Kiwi (New Zealander) but she spends a lot of time in Australia doing much of her work here. She probably spends more than eighty percent of the year in Australia. Carla runs her own law firm in Australia and acts in relation to various kinds of matters. The law firm is run as a sole trader ongoing concern and the firm attracts about $80,000 in income per year. It has expenses in the vicinity of $20,000 per year. It has no employees. All of Carla’s clients are based in Australia, but Carla does work from Auckland, New Zealand when she is there. Carla is also a consultant with another Australian law firm (Law Firm X or LFX). She is contracted to provide LFX with advice and to act on behalf of LFX’s clients when and if required. Carla makes about another $80,000 per year in relation to her work for LFX. She has expenses in relation to the LFX to amount of about $2000 per month. LFX compensates Carla in respect of all those expenses. LFX provides Carla with a laptop and a phone. Carla uses the phone to make both private and LFX related phone calls. The monthly phone call amounts are estimated by LFX only and they vary from month to month. LFX contributes to Carla’s air travel tickets from time to time too, and pays for about 50% of her travels yearly. Carla is also a sole director and secretary of a PTY LTD company (“the Company”). Carla’s Company is engaged in consulting work with various clients in many geographic areas in relation to marketing, especially marketing in the Asia-Pacific region with respect to various Information Technology software products. This is by far Carla’s most profitable venture and brings her about $1900 per day inclusive of GST. The Company currently has about $200,000 in its bank account in an Australian bank which money relates to the sale of 200 Shares in the Company to other shareholders (the shares were initially estimated at $200 each and Carla sold them at $1000 per share later in September of 2018). The Company Elite Education Institute (CRICOS Provider Code: 03390A). All rights reserved. also had an additional $100,000 in its accounts, which it loaned to Carla by way of an interest-free and GST-free loan in the October of 2018 amounting to $100,000. Carla is also involved in part-time employment with a governmental law reform advocacy organisation which is a NSW state-sponsored organisation (Law Reform Organisation or LRO). The LRO provides Carla with an annual salary of $65,000 per year and state-based superannuation. The LRO provides Carla with a phone and a laptop also. The LRO knows that Carla is not present all the time in Sydney and so the laptop is used by Carla to do the work for the LRO when Carla is away. Carla has represented to the LRO that she does not use the phone, nor the laptop, in relation to any private usage, and uses these only for the LRO’s purposes. The LRO has also provided Carla with a car for her use — the car was valued at $25,000 when it was provided to Carla. The LRO’s regulations say that the car must only be used for work-related purposes, but Carla uses the Car privately as well as for work. Carla’s boss at the LRO knows that Carla uses the car privately. Assume that Carla’s healthcare is catered for within Australia. (a) Identify any tax related issues raised in this scenario and explain these using the provisions of statute, case law and any ATO decisions or rulings. No calculations are required and you are to provide analysis only. (35%) (b) Use the case FCT v Applegate (1979) 9 ATR 1899 [text 4.110 or external reference] briefly contrast your answer to part (a) in respect of Carla’s residency with that of Mr. Applegate’s. (5%) Elite Education Institute (CRICOS Provider Code: 03390A). All rights reserved. The facts of the case To start with Carla is a citizen of New Zealand and spends 80% of her time in Australia earning a living. She runs her own law firm as a sole trader which attracts an income of $80,000 per year. The expenses from her law firm are $20,000 and it has no employees at all. All Carla clients’ domiciles in Australia and another interesting aspect is that when she visits New Zealand, she takes a leave and does not work from there. Another fact is she works as a consultant in LFX law firm and her income generates about$80000 per in relation to her work in LFX. Carla expenses in LFX totals up to $2000 per month or $24000 in year and this subject to internal tax code. An act the law firm reimburses here and provides with laptop and phone which she uses to make private and LFX work related calls. Also, her air travel is catered by LFX firm time and it pays 50% of the expenses per year. Meanwhile, Carla is director and secretary of PTY Ltd where she is a consultant and her clients resides in Asia pacific regions. The venture attracts about $1900 per which is inclusive of GST. PTY ltd has $200,000 in Australian bank which is related to 200 shares in the company funds for shareholders .Carla sold these shares to Australian citizens. Also, she has a part time job with government law reform agency which is NSW state sponsored .The LRO pays here $65,000 per year and provides her with a phone, laptop and car for official duties and uses this both official and private activities . Most importantly, Carla accesses healthcare services within Australia. Analysis of the law According to Australia tax code, it identifies two jurisdictional rules when assessment income tax. The first limb arises from residents who are assessed on their ordinary income based on s6-5(2) and secondly, foreign residents assessed on their ordinary income that emanates from Australia sources. Besides, only residents are eligible to Medical levy (ML) and Medical levy surcharge (MLS). Section 995-1 ITAA 97 defines who is a resident for the purposes of ITAA 36. The literal meaning and individual gains resident status after dwelling in Australia for a considerable amount of time. To answer the question on whether Carla is a resident of Australia for income tax purposes, two tests does apply that is common and domicile test. The common law test takes into account the actual presence of the payer and family , has home in Australia, the employment and social relationship to mention a few. Therefore, the question on resident under the common law test is question of fact which court examines in a case to case basis. In the case of C of T v Miller 91946) CLR 93, the court restated the common law test b looking at the ordinary meaning and defined it as dwelling in place for a considerable amount of time. In another leading authority, Leven v IRC 91928) AC 217, the House of Lords set a new jurisprudence by stating that the a tax payer does not need to have a fixed place of abode in UK even if he is present for a few days in the county .Thus, the activities one engages in the country will constitute the fats of the case and can give rise to resident for purposes of tax. In another persuasive authority in the case Shand v FCT (2003) ATC 2080, the tribunal examined the amount of time a resident spends time between Australia and Kuwait and returned a verdict that she is still a resident of Australia. From the common law test, Carla is resident of Australia for income and statutory income due to following reasons. She has lived Australia for a considerable amount of time, she engages in economic activities within the meaning of ITAA 97. Thus, Carla she is subject to section 995 -1 ITAA 97 and here income from various activities in the country. Meanwhile, the domicile test looks at a different approach and one only is eligible to for income tax if he or she is domiciled in Australia and has a permanent place outside Australia and the central intention is remain his residence for the time being. The question of Permanent abode was settled in the case of FCT v Applegate where the tribunal of record defined did not amount something everlasting and has residence outside Australia. From facts of the case, the domicile test fits the definition of Carla case and thus she is a resident of Australia since she has been in the country for a long time. It is also important to note that any tax payer who has been in Australia for half year of the income becomes the resident of Australia unless she satisfies the following conditions, her usual place f abode is outside Australia, she not intending o take the residence of Australia and thus ousts the jurisdictional question. The jurisprudence emanating from above the Commissioner uses IT 2650 in determining the residency status and looks at the time one moves to office and the durability of association like having bank accounts and has links with government. Most importantly, Carla has incorporated her company is within the jurisdiction of Australia as per the laws of Australia; any person who registers and incorporates the company in Australia becomes a resident for income tax purposes. Therefore, Carla is meets the minimum legal requirements and thus she is eligible for resident purposes and her earning will be subjected to income tax and other statutory deductions. In this case , FCT has jurisdiction to subject her earning to income tax assessment and deductions a the source and she will not suffer any double taxation in her home country. FCT v Appegate(1979) ATR 1899 comparison

• WE OFFER THE BEST CUSTOM PAPER WRITING SERVICES. WE HAVE DONE THIS QUESTION BEFORE, WE CAN ALSO DO IT FOR YOU.
• Assignment status: Already Solved By Our Experts
• (USA, AUS, UK & CA PhD. Writers)
• CLICK HERE TO GET A PROFESSIONAL WRITER TO WORK ON THIS PAPER AND OTHER SIMILAR PAPERS, GET A NON PLAGIARIZED PAPER FROM OUR EXPERTS

QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPER – NO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER

Why Choose Us?

How It Works

• Click on the “Place Your Order” tab at the top menu or “Order Now” icon at the bottom and a new page will appear with an order form to be filled.
• Fill in your paper’s requirements in the “PAPER DETAILS” section.
• Fill in your paper’s academic level, deadline, and the required number of pages from the drop-down menus.
• Click “CREATE ACCOUNT & SIGN IN” to enter your registration details and get an account with us for record-keeping and then, click on “PROCEED TO CHECKOUT” at the bottom of the page.
• From there, the payment sections will show, follow the guided payment process and your order will be available for our writing team to work on it.

About AcademicWritersBay.com

AcademicWritersBay.com is an easy-to-use and reliable service that is ready to assist you with your papers 24/7/ 365days a year. 99% of our customers are happy with their papers. Our team is efficient and will always tackle your essay needs comprehensively assuring you of excellent results. Feel free to ask them anything concerning your essay demands or Order.

AcademicWritersBay.com is a private company that offers academic support and assistance to students at all levels. Our mission is to provide proficient and high quality academic services to our highly esteemed clients. AcademicWritersBay.com is equipped with competent and proficient writers to tackle all types of your academic needs, and provide you with excellent results. Most of our writers are holders of master’s degrees or PhDs, which is an surety of excellent results to our clients. We provide assistance to students all over the world.
We provide high quality term papers, research papers, essays, proposals, theses and many others. At AcademicWritersBay.com, you can be sure of excellent grades in your assignments and final exams.