NR 562 CCN Data Driven Decision Making in Complex Systems Essay

NR 562: LEADERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT WITHIN COMPLEX HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS Module 6 Assignment: Data-driven Decision-making in Complex Systems Guideline and Rubric DUE 02/19/2023 PURPOSE Across healthcare settings, a vast amount of information is collected and analyzed to assess organizational outcomes regarding quality, safety, and efficiency. The analysis of this data is used to measure organizational performance and to drive strategic decision-making within the system. The purpose of this assignment is to examine one specific data point and how it contributes to the assessment of quality, safety, and/or efficiency within the healthcare system. The importance of the selected data point, how it shapes decision-making, and implications for healthcare systems will be discussed. COURSE LEARNING OUTCOMES Through this assignment, the student will address the following course learning outcomes: • • CO 3: Determine strategies to support efficiency and the responsible use of healthcare resources. (PO 2) CO 4: Develop problem-solution strategies for a selected issues within the healthcare environment. (PO 5) SUGGESTED DUE DATE This assignment has a suggested due date of Sunday 11:59 pm MT at the end of Module 6. Final due date is Sunday 11:59 pm MT at the end of Module 7. TOTAL POINTS POSSIBLE: 200 POINTS ASSIGNMENT OVERVIEW Consider how data analysis contributes to safe, high quality, efficient delivery of healthcare. Investigate the role of information management in the evaluation of outcome achievement and provision of data to drive strategic decision-making. Identify one specific data point for which information is collected within a healthcare system. Develop a 4 – 6 page paper to address the rubric expectations; use a minimum of 5 scholarly sources to support your work. 1. Provide an introduction to the paper. 2. Explain one selected data point and the purpose for the collection of this data within the healthcare system. Describe how this data point measures quality, safety, and/or efficiency within the system. NR 562 3/20/19 NR 562: LEADERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT WITHIN COMPLEX HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS Discuss one internal or external benchmark surrounding this data point that serves as a measure or indicator of success. 3. Describe a case scenario where outcomes regarding this data point fall short of meeting the required benchmark. Identify the stakeholders impacted by the poor outcome, and the consequences realized by each stakeholder. Discuss the potential impact on organizational quality, safety, and/or efficiency that results. 4. Describe how outcomes surrounding this data point reflect organizational performance regarding quality, safety, or efficiency. Explain how the data in the case scenario can inform strategic decisionmaking to improve organizational outcomes. Create an action plan to correct the poor outcomes noted in the case scenario. Explain the action steps, stakeholder involvement, influencing factors that will impact the plan. 5. Provide a conclusion to the paper. ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS 1. Abide by the Chamberlain College of Nursing Academic Integrity Policy. 2. Sources older than five years may not be used without the permission of the class professor. 3. Title page, pagination, subheadings, body of paper, citation of sources, and reference page must follow APA guidelines as found in the current edition of the manual. 4. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, sentence and paragraph structure are followed and consistent with formal, scholarly writing as noted in the APA Manual (current edition). 5. Sources older than five years may not be used without the permission of the class professor. 6. No direct quotes are to be used in this assignment. 7. Please note: If you do not receive a proficient rating in any major content category, you can resubmit your assignment with revisions in those content categories to receive a better grade. You have one additional opportunity to revise after the initial submission in order to make improvements. The initial submission must be a complete paper, rough drafts will not be graded. All revisions must be submitted no later than Sunday of Week 7 at 11:59pm. (You cannot revise your graduate level writing style for a higher grade in that category) ASSIGNMENT CRITERIA Assessment Criteria Introduction Points 20 % 10% Description This section includes: • • • • NR 562 3/20/19 Importance of information management to determine outcomes healthcare systems Role of data to inform decision-making to promote quality, safety, and efficiency Identification of the sections of the paper Sufficient integration of scholarly sources to support information presented NR 562: LEADERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT WITHIN COMPLEX HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS Data Collection to Measure Outcomes 40 20% This section includes: • • • • Case Application 40 20% This section includes • • • Data-driven Decision-making 50 25% • • • 20 10% Explanation of how data in the case scenario can be used to inform strategic decisionmaking to improve outcomes regarding quality, safety, or efficiency Create an action plan to correct the poor outcomes noted in the case scenario Explain the action steps, stakeholder involvement, and influencing factors that will impact the plan Sufficient integration of scholarly sources to support information presented This section includes: • NR 562 3/20/19 Description of a case scenario where outcomes regarding this data point fall short of meeting the identified benchmark Discussion of the potential impact on organizational quality, safety, and/or efficiency that results Identification of stakeholders impacted by the poor outcome and the consequences realized by each stakeholder This section includes: • Conclusion Description of one identified data point and purpose for collection within the healthcare system Explanation of how outcomes surrounding this data point contribute to assessment of organizational performance regarding quality, safety, and/or efficiency Description of one example of an internal or external benchmark regarding this data point to serve as an indicator of success Sufficient integration of scholarly sources to support information presented Concluding points regarding the role of information management and outcome NR 562: LEADERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT WITHIN COMPLEX HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS • Graduate-level Writing Style 30 15% • • • • • Quality of Literature Support assessment to inform decision-making within healthcare systems Importance of outcome assessment to sustain or improve quality, safety, and/or efficiency within healthcare systems Correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, sentence and paragraph structure Clarity, organization, and logical flow of ideas within writing Scholarly, professional writing tone with no use of first person Synthesis of information is present with no direct quotes used in this assignment Correct APA format for the following: o Page numbering o Font style and size o Margins and spacing o Headings; subheadings o Citation and referencing sources o Mechanics of style (abbreviations, capitalization, italics, numbers) It is an expectation that a minimum of 5 scholarly sources, current within five years, are integrated within the assignment. If the above expectation is not met, 5 points shall be deducted. Assignment Length Criteria It is an expectation that the paper is a minimum of 4 pages in length, and a maximum of 6 pages (not including the title or reference pages). If the above expectation is not met, 5 points shall be deducted. Total NR 562 3/20/19 200 100% A quality assignment will meet or exceed the above requirements. NR 562: LEADERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT WITHIN COMPLEX HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS GRADING RUBRIC Assessment Criteria Introduction Distinguished Exceeds Proficient Needs Improvement (100%) (92%) (84%) (0) 20 Points 18 Points 16 Points 0 Points Proficient presentation of information evidenced by content covered in a limited or superficial manner in two or more of the content areas: Presentation of information needs improvement as evidenced by content that is missing or unsatisfactory in one or more of the content areas: Distinguished presentation of information evidenced by all of the following content areas covered in a comprehensive and concise manner: • • • • Importance of information management to determine outcomes healthcare systems Role of data to inform decision-making to promote quality, safety, and efficiency Identification of the sections of the paper Sufficient integration of scholarly sources to support information presented Presentation of information exceeds expectations evidenced by most content covered in a comprehensive and concise manner, but with one area where coverage is superficial: • • • • Importance of information management to determine outcomes healthcare systems Role of data to inform decision-making to promote quality, safety, and efficiency Identification of the sections of the paper Sufficient integration of scholarly sources to • • • • Importance of information management to determine outcomes healthcare systems Role of data to inform decisionmaking to promote quality, safety, and efficiency Identification of the sections of the paper Sufficient integration of scholarly sources to support • • • • Importance of information management to determine outcomes healthcare systems Role of data to inform decision-making to promote quality, safety, and efficiency Identification of the sections of the paper Sufficient integration of scholarly sources to support information presented 5 NR 562: LEADERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT WITHIN COMPLEX HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS support information presented Data Collection to Measure Outcomes 40 Points Distinguished presentation of information evidenced by all of the following content areas covered in a comprehensive and concise manner: • • • Description of one identified data point and purpose for collection within the healthcare system Explanation of how outcomes surrounding this data point contribute to assessment of organizational performance regarding quality, safety, and/or efficiency Description of one example of an internal or external benchmark regarding this data point to serve as an indicator of success information presented 36 Points Presentation of information exceeds expectations evidenced by most content covered in a comprehensive and concise manner, but with one area where coverage is superficial: • • • Description of one identified data point and purpose for collection within the healthcare system Explanation of how outcomes surrounding this data point contribute to assessment of organizational performance regarding quality, safety, and/or efficiency Description of one example of an internal or external benchmark regarding this data point 33 Points 0 Points Proficient presentation of information evidenced by content covered in a limited or superficial manner in two or more of the content areas: Presentation of information needs improvement as evidenced by content that is missing or unsatisfactory in one or more of the content areas: • • • Description of one identified data point and purpose for collection within the healthcare system Explanation of how outcomes surrounding this data point contribute to assessment of organizational performance regarding quality, safety, and/or efficiency Description of one example of an internal or external benchmark regarding this data point to serve as an indicator of success • • • Description of one identified data point and purpose for collection within the healthcare system Explanation of how outcomes surrounding this data point contribute to assessment of organizational performance regarding quality, safety, and/or efficiency Description of one example of an internal or external benchmark regarding this data point to serve as an indicator of success 6 NR 562: LEADERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT WITHIN COMPLEX HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS • Case Application Sufficient integration of scholarly sources to support information presented • 40 Points Distinguished presentation of information evidenced by all of the following content areas covered in a comprehensive and concise manner: • • • Description of a case scenario where outcomes regarding this data point fall short of meeting the identified benchmark Discussion of the potential impact on organizational quality, safety, and/or efficiency that results Identification of stakeholders impacted by the poor outcome and the consequences realized by each stakeholder to serve as an indicator of success Sufficient integration of scholarly sources to support information presented • 36 Points Presentation of information exceeds expectations evidenced by most content covered in a comprehensive and concise manner, but with one area where coverage is superficial: • • • Description of a case scenario where outcomes regarding this data point fall short of meeting the identified benchmark Discussion of the potential impact on organizational quality, safety, and/or efficiency that results Identification of stakeholders impacted by the poor outcome Sufficient integration of scholarly sources to support information presented • Sufficient integration of scholarly sources to support information presented 33 Points 0 Points Proficient presentation of information evidenced by content covered in a limited or superficial manner in two or more of the content areas: Presentation of information needs improvement as evidenced by content that is missing or unsatisfactory in one or more of the content areas: • • • Description of a case scenario where outcomes regarding this data point fall short of meeting the identified benchmark Discussion of the potential impact on organizational quality, safety, and/or efficiency that results Identification of stakeholders impacted by the poor outcome and the consequences realized by each stakeholder • • • Description of a case scenario where outcomes regarding this data point fall short of meeting the identified benchmark Discussion of the potential impact on organizational quality, safety, and/or efficiency that results Identification of stakeholders impacted by the poor outcome and the consequences realized by each stakeholder 7 NR 562: LEADERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT WITHIN COMPLEX HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS and the consequences realized by each stakeholder Data-driven Decisionmaking 50 Points Distinguished presentation of information evidenced by all of the following content areas covered in a comprehensive and concise manner: • • • • Explanation of how data in the case scenario can be used to inform strategic decision-making to improve outcomes regarding quality, safety, or efficiency Create an action plan to correct the poor outcomes noted in the case scenario Explain the action steps, stakeholder involvement, and influencing factors that will impact the plan Sufficient integration of scholarly sources to 46 Points Presentation of information exceeds expectations evidenced by most content covered in a comprehensive and concise manner, but with one area where coverage is superficial: • • • Explanation of how data in the case scenario can be used to inform strategic decisionmaking to improve outcomes regarding quality, safety, or efficiency Create an action plan to correct the poor outcomes noted in the case scenario Explain the action steps, stakeholder involvement, and influencing factors that will impact the plan 42 Points 0 Points Proficient presentation of information evidenced by content covered in a limited or superficial manner in two or more of the content areas: Presentation of information needs improvement as evidenced by content that is missing or unsatisfactory in one or more of the content areas: • • • • Explanation of how data in the case scenario can be used to inform strategic decision-making to improve outcomes regarding quality, safety, or efficiency Create an action plan to correct the poor outcomes noted in the case scenario Explain the action steps, stakeholder involvement, and influencing factors that will impact the plan Sufficient integration of scholarly sources • • • • Explanation of how data in the case scenario can be used to inform strategic decisionmaking to improve outcomes regarding quality, safety, or efficiency Create an action plan to correct the poor outcomes noted in the case scenario Explain the action steps, stakeholder involvement, and influencing factors that will impact the plan Sufficient integration of scholarly sources to 8 NR 562: LEADERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT WITHIN COMPLEX HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS support information presented Conclusion • 20 Points Distinguished presentation of information evidenced by all of the following content areas covered in a comprehensive and concise manner: • • Concluding points regarding the role of information management and outcome assessment to inform decisionmaking within healthcare systems Importance of outcome assessment to sustain or improve quality, safety, and/or efficiency within healthcare systems to support information presented Sufficient integration of scholarly sources to support information presented 18 Points Presentation of information exceeds expectations evidenced by most content covered in a comprehensive and concise manner, but with one area where coverage is superficial: • • Concluding points regarding the role of information management and outcome assessment to inform decisionmaking within healthcare systems Importance of outcome assessment to sustain or improve quality, safety, and/or efficiency within healthcare systems support information presented 16 Points 0 Points Proficient presentation of information evidenced by content covered in a limited or superficial manner in two or more of the content areas: Presentation of information needs improvement as evidenced by content that is missing or unsatisfactory in one or more of the content areas: • • Concluding points regarding the role of information management and outcome assessment to inform decisionmaking within healthcare systems Importance of outcome assessment to sustain or improve quality, safety, and/or efficiency within healthcare systems • • Concluding points regarding the role of information management and outcome assessment to inform decisionmaking within healthcare systems Importance of outcome assessment to sustain or improve quality, safety, and/or efficiency within healthcare systems 9 NR 562: LEADERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT WITHIN COMPLEX HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS Graduatelevel Writing Style 30 Points 27 Points 25 Points 0 Points Distinguished graduate-level writing style is evidenced by meeting all of the following criteria with 0-1 errors total: • Correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, sentence and paragraph structure • Clarity, organization, and logical flow of ideas within writing • Scholarly, professional writing tone with no use of first person • Synthesis of information is present with no direct quotes used in this assignment • Correct APA format for the following: o Page numbering o Font style and size o Margins and spacing o Headings; subheadings o Citation and referencing sources o Mechanics of style (abbreviations, Graduate-level writing style exceeds expectations as evidenced by meeting the following criteria with 2-4 errors total: • Correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, sentence and paragraph structure • Clarity, organization, and logical flow of ideas within writing • Scholarly, professional writing tone with no use of first person • Synthesis of information is present with no direct quotes used in this assignment • Correct APA format for the following: o Page numbering o Font style and size o Margins and spacing o Headings; subheadings o Citation and referencing sources o Mechanics of style (abbreviations, Proficient graduate-level writing style is evidenced by meeting the following criteria with 5-7 errors, total: • Correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, sentence and paragraph structure • Clarity, organization, and logical flow of ideas within writing • Scholarly, professional writing tone with no use of first person • Synthesis of information is present with no direct quotes used in this assignment • Correct APA format for the following: o Page numbering o Font style and size o Margins and spacing o Headings; subheadings o Citation and referencing sources o Mechanics of style (abbreviations, Graduate-level writing style needs improvement as evidenced by meeting the following criteria with 8 or more errors, total: • Correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, sentence and paragraph structure • Clarity, organization, and logical flow of ideas within writing • Scholarly, professional writing tone with no use of first person • Synthesis of information is present with no direct quotes used in this assignment • Correct APA format for the following: o Page numbering o Font style and size o Margins and spacing o Headings; subheadings o Citation and referencing sources o Mechanics of style (abbreviations, 10 NR 562: LEADERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT WITHIN COMPLEX HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS capitalization, italics, numbers) Quality of Literature Support Assignment Length Expectations 0 Points Deducted A minimum of 5 peerreviewed scholarly sources, current within 5 years, are integrated within the assignment. 0 Points Deducted The length of the assignment meets the criteria: capitalization, italics, numbers) capitalization, italics, numbers) capitalization, italics, numbers) 5 Points Deducted The assignment fails to meet the requirement noted for quality of literature support. 5 Points Deducted The assignment fails to meet the requirement for length. Minimum of 4 pages in length; Maximum of 6 pages in length. (Not including title or reference pages) 11 NR562 Reflection 2 Due 02/19/2023 Based on your response to Reflection: Part 1, state one insight that you gained regarding the concepts in this module. Connect learning achieved to a minimum of one course outcome addressed during this module. Course Outcomes CO 3: Determine strategies to support efficiency and the responsible use of healthcare resources within a caring environment. (PO 2) • CO 4: Develop problem-solution strategies for a selected issues within the healthcare environment. (PO 5) • Module Objectives Analyze the impact of information systems on the delivery of efficient, safe, highquality healthcare. (CO 3) • Discuss strategies to promote health-related and organizational outcomes through the application of information management systems. (COs 3 and 4) • This is what I put in part 1: In this module, I hope to learn/do: Be able to determine strategies to support efficiency and the responsible use of healthcare resources within a caring environment. • Be able to develop problem-solution strategies for a selected issues within the healthcare environment. • Module Reflective Discussion Guidelines and Rubric PURPOSE The purpose of this reflective discussion is to encourage student reflection upon concepts learned during the module and their contribution to professional growth. Students will reflect upon learning within each module and connect insights gained with course-specific outcomes. DUE DATE • • Reflection 1 is due by 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday during Modules 1–8 of the session. Reflection 2 is due by 11:59 p.m. MT Sunday at the end of Modules 1–7 of the session and due 11:59 p.m. MT Saturday at the end of Module 8 of the session. TOTAL POINTS POSSIBLE: 15 POINTS REFLECTION OVERVIEW This course includes eight weekly modules of content. During each of the eight modules within this course session, please respond to the following reflective questions, beginning with Module 1 (the first week of the session) and continuing in consecutive order throughout the eight modules of the course session. For each module, consider the course concepts and topics addressed during the respective module, and respond to the following questions. Reflection 1: Review the course outcomes and consider the module objectives. What do you hope to learn during this module of study? Reflection 2: Based on your response to Reflection 1, state one insight that you gained regarding the concepts in this module. Connect learning achieved to a minimum of one course outcome addressed during this module. REFLECTION INSTRUCTIONS 1. Abide by the Chamberlain College of Nursing Academic Integrity Policy. 2. Read the two reflective questions and respond within the following timeframes noted above. MSN-AT Reflection Guidelines and Rubric_January 2019 1 3. Follow the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and sentence and paragraph structures. 4. The use of first person tense is acceptable in the reflective discussions. REFLECTION CRITERIA Category Points % Description Reflection 1 6 40% Reflective posting is submitted and describes what the student hopes to learn during this module. Reflection 2 6 40% Reflective posting is submitted and • describes one insight gained regarding the concepts in this module; and • connects learning achieved to a minimum of one course outcome addressed in this module. Timeliness of Postings 3 20% During Modules 1–8: Posting in response to Reflection 1 is made before Wednesday 11:59 p.m. MT. AND During Modules 1–7: Posting in response to Reflection 2 is made between Thursday 12:00 a.m. MT and Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT. OR During Module 8: Posting in response to Reflection 2 is made between Thursday 12:00 a.m. MT and Saturday 11:59 p.m. MT. Graduatelevel Writing Style It is an expectation that graduate-level writing style is used, evidenced by correct: • Grammar • Spelling • Word usage • Punctuation • Sentence structure • Paragraph structure If the above expectation is not met, 3 points shall be deducted. Total 15 100% A quality reflective discussion will meet or exceed all the above requirements. MSN-AT Reflection Guidelines and Rubric_January 2019 2 GRADING RUBRIC Reflection Criteria Met Not Met Reflection 1 6 Points 0 Points Reflective posting is submitted and describes what the student hopes to learn during this module. Reflective posting is submitted but fails to clearly describe what the student hopes to learn during this module. OR No posting is submitted in response to Reflection 1. Reflection 2 6 Points 0 Points Reflective posting is submitted and • describes one insight gained regarding the concepts in this module; and • connects learning achieved to a minimum of one course outcome addressed in this module. Reflective posting is submitted but fails to meet one or both of the following criteria. • Describes one insight gained regarding the concepts in this module. • Connects learning achieved to a minimum of one course outcome addressed in this module. OR No posting is submitted in response to Reflection 2. Timeliness of Postings 3 Points 0 Points The following expectations for timely postings are met: One or more of the following expectations for timely postings are not met: During Modules 1–8: Posting in response to Reflection 1 is made before Wednesday 11:59 p.m. MT. During Modules 1–8: Posting in response to Reflection 1 is made before Wednesday 11:59 p.m. MT. AND AND During Modules 1–7: Posting in response to Reflection 2 is made between Thursday 12:00 a.m. MT and Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT. During Modules 1–7: Posting in response to Reflection 2 is made between Thursday 12:00 a.m. MT and Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT. MSN-AT Reflection Guidelines and Rubric_January 2019 3 Graduatelevel Writing Style OR OR During Module 8: Posting in response to Reflection 2 is made between Thursday 12:00 a.m. MT and Saturday 11:59 p.m. MT. During Module 8: Posting in response to Reflection 2 is made between Thursday 12:00 a.m. MT and Saturday 11:59 p.m. MT. 0 Points Deducted 3 Points Deducted Graduate-level writing style is used, evidenced by correct: • Grammar • Spelling • Word usage • Punctuation • Sentence structure • Paragraph structure MSN-AT Reflection Guidelines and Rubric_January 2019 One or more errors is present in any of the following areas. • • • • • • Grammar Spelling Word usage Punctuation Sentence structure Paragraph structure 4

• WE OFFER THE BEST CUSTOM PAPER WRITING SERVICES. WE HAVE DONE THIS QUESTION BEFORE, WE CAN ALSO DO IT FOR YOU.
• Assignment status: Already Solved By Our Experts
• (USA, AUS, UK & CA PhD. Writers)
• CLICK HERE TO GET A PROFESSIONAL WRITER TO WORK ON THIS PAPER AND OTHER SIMILAR PAPERS, GET A NON PLAGIARIZED PAPER FROM OUR EXPERTS

QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPER – NO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER

Why Choose Us?

How It Works

• Click on the “Place Your Order” tab at the top menu or “Order Now” icon at the bottom and a new page will appear with an order form to be filled.
• Fill in your paper’s requirements in the “PAPER DETAILS” section.
• Fill in your paper’s academic level, deadline, and the required number of pages from the drop-down menus.
• Click “CREATE ACCOUNT & SIGN IN” to enter your registration details and get an account with us for record-keeping and then, click on “PROCEED TO CHECKOUT” at the bottom of the page.
• From there, the payment sections will show, follow the guided payment process and your order will be available for our writing team to work on it.

About AcademicWritersBay.com

AcademicWritersBay.com is an easy-to-use and reliable service that is ready to assist you with your papers 24/7/ 365days a year. 99% of our customers are happy with their papers. Our team is efficient and will always tackle your essay needs comprehensively assuring you of excellent results. Feel free to ask them anything concerning your essay demands or Order.

AcademicWritersBay.com is a private company that offers academic support and assistance to students at all levels. Our mission is to provide proficient and high quality academic services to our highly esteemed clients. AcademicWritersBay.com is equipped with competent and proficient writers to tackle all types of your academic needs, and provide you with excellent results. Most of our writers are holders of master’s degrees or PhDs, which is an surety of excellent results to our clients. We provide assistance to students all over the world.
We provide high quality term papers, research papers, essays, proposals, theses and many others. At AcademicWritersBay.com, you can be sure of excellent grades in your assignments and final exams.