14 pages<\/p>\n
Deliverable 7 Social Media Plan
If I were to establish a profitable company, I would form the Jerry\u2019s Caf\u00e9. The cafe would be the coffee alongside the \u2026<\/p>\n
Deliverable 7 Social Media Plan
If I were to establish a profitable company, I would form the Jerry\u2019s Caf\u00e9. The cafe would be the coffee alongside the internet house. Jerry\u2019s \u2026<\/p>\n
University of Maryland Baltimore County Alzheimer Disease Discussion
Alzheimer\u2019s Disease76-year-old Iranian MaleBACKGROUNDMr. Akkad is a 76 year old Iranian male who is brought to your offi \u2026<\/p>\n
University of Maryland Baltimore County Alzheimer Disease Discussion
Alzheimer\u2019s Disease76-year-old Iranian MaleBACKGROUNDMr. Akkad is a 76 year old Iranian male who is brought to your office by his eldest son for \u201cstrange behavior.\u201d Mr. Akkad was seen by his family physician who ruled out any organic basis for Mr. Akkad\u2019s behavior. All laboratory and diagnostic imaging tests (including CT-scan of the head) were normal.According to his son, he has been demonstrating some strange thoughts and behaviors for the past two years, but things seem to be getting worse. Per the client\u2019s son, the family noticed that Mr. Akkad\u2019s personality began to change a few years ago. He began to lose interest in religious activities with the family and became more \u201ccritical\u201d of everyone. They also noticed that things he used to take seriously had become a source of \u201camusement\u201d and \u201cridicule.\u201dOver the course of the past two years, the family has noticed that Mr. Akkad has been forgetting things. His son also reports that sometimes he has difficult \u201cfinding the right words\u201d in a conversation and then will shift to an entirely different line of conversation. SUBJECTIVEDuring the clinical interview, Mr. Akkad is pleasant, cooperative and seems to enjoy speaking with you. You notice some confabulation during various aspects of memory testing, so you perform a Mini-Mental State Exam. Mr. Akkad scores 18 out of 30 with primary deficits in orientation, registration, attention & calculation, and recall. The score suggests moderate dementia. MENTAL STATUS EXAMMr. Akkad is 76 year old Iranian male who is cooperative with today\u2019s clinical interview. His eye contact is poor. Speech is clear, coherent, but tangential at times. He makes no unusual motor movements and demonstrates no tic. Self-reported mood is euthymic. Affect however is restricted. He denies visual or auditory hallucinations. No delusional or paranoid thought processes noted. He is alert and oriented to person, partially oriented to place, but is disoriented to time and event [he reports that he thought he was coming to lunch but \u201cwound up here\u201d- referring to your office, at which point he begins to laugh]. Insight and judgment are impaired. Impulse control is also impaired as evidenced by Mr. Akkad\u2019s standing up during the clinical interview and walking towards the door. When you asked where he was going, he stated that he did not know. Mr. Akkad denies suicidal or homicidal ideation.Diagnosis: Major neurocognitive disorder due to Alzheimer\u2019s disease (presumptive) RESOURCES\u00a7 Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (2002). Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources. Decision Point OneSelect what you should do:Begin Exelon (rivastigmine) 1.5 mg orally BID with an increase to 3 mg orally BID in 2 weeks: Begin Aricept (donepezil) 5 mg orally at BEDTIMEBegin Razadyne (galantamine) 4 mg orally BIDGo to Databases and then go to a Search Engine like PUBMED, CINAHL and\/or COCHRANE DATABASE for Systematic Reviews to search for evidence-based research studies. Use search terms like \u201cAlzheimers\u201d and the drug names from the decision tree. Read the abstracts of the studies that seem appropriate to determine which one fits the scenario the best. Then read the complete study and use the knowledge gained as evidence to support your treatment decisions. The study results should be used to determine which of the 3 options is the most appropriate treatment at each decision point in the decision tree. You may need to do a search at each decision point if you are unable to find a study that supports all 3 of the decision points.Note, the decision tree provides feedback after each decision point. Do NOT include the feedback from the decision tree in your paper. I will not award any points for doing so.Write a 3-page summary paper that addresses the following:Briefly summarize the patient case study you were assigned, including each of the three decisions you took for the patient presented.In this scenario, pretend you are seeing this patient for a visit at your office. Decide which one of the three decisions would be most appropriate (decision point 1). Once you click on your decision, the tree will provide information on what happened since the last visit (4 weeks ago) and you need to decide which of the next three options will be the best (decision point 2). Once you click on your decision, the tree will guide you to the final visit (4 weeks later), provide information on what happened the last 4 weeks and present you with the next three decisions (decision point 3).Include a brief description of the most important information from the patient case. Then describe your decisions at decision points #1, #2 and #3. Note, points are not awarded based on what your decision at each step was (there is no wrong answer, though there is a more appropriate choice at each decision point).This section of your paper should take up no more than half of a page and will serve as the introduction.Based on the decisions you recommended for the patient case study, explain whether you believe the decisions provided were supported by the evidence-based literature (EBL). Be specific and provide examples. Be sure to support your response with evidence and references from outside resources.EBL refers to primary research studies done on this disease state and the drugs used to treat it. Primary research includes randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews.You need to provide a short summary of the research study you identified by using PUBMED, CINAHL and\/or COCHRANE DATABASE of Systematic Reviews. Include information on the study design e.g. the number of patients, treatment drugs, duration of treatment.Do NOT cite a textbook.What were you hoping to achieve with the decisions you recommended for the patient case study you were assigned? Support your response with evidence and references from outside resources.Research studies are used to determine a.) time to therapeutic effect, b.) the size of the therapeutic effect, c.) side effects one can expect from a drug treatment and d.) if one treatment is more effective than others.For this section, you need to include the results from the study you based your decision on for decision points #1, #2 and #3.Explain any difference between what you expected to achieve with each of the decisions and the results of the decision in the exercise. Describe whether they were different. Be specific and provide examples.One can expect similar outcomes in practice as was found in clinical trials if the study fits your patient.Here you need to compare the results from the research study to what happened in practice (the feedback provided by the decision tree). Refer to a.) time to therapeutic effect, b.) the size of the therapeutic effect, c.) side effects one can expect from a drug treatment and d.) if one treatment is more effective than others.<\/p>\n
NURS514 Phoenix Pros & Cons of Affordable Care Act Debate PPT
NSG\/514: Health Law, Policy, Ethics, And Global TrendsWk 4 Team \u2013 Affordable Care Act Debate [due Mon]Wk 4 Team \u2013 Affordab \u2026<\/p>\n
NURS514 Phoenix Pros & Cons of Affordable Care Act Debate PPT
NSG\/514: Health Law, Policy, Ethics, And Global TrendsWk 4 Team \u2013 Affordable Care Act Debate [due Mon]Wk 4 Team \u2013 Affordable Care Act Debate [due Mon]Assignment ContentAssignment Content Learning Team \u2013 Affordable Care Act DebateDebate the following:The Affordable Care Act is achieving its intended outcomes.The Affordable Care Act aligns with the IHI Triple Aim.Create an 12- to 15-slide presentation that demonstrates the team\u2019s evaluation of the pros and cons, as well as whether the team reached a consensus. Speaker Notes are required. The presentation content must reflect pros and cons of each of the following components: Connections to access and health insurance coverageInsurance recipientsExpanded options of coveragePayment systems reformEquity for nursing servicesCoordination of care and preventionWorkforce capacityPublic health provisionsCostFinancialPoliticalImplementationSupporting data and evidenceEthical, legal, and regulatory opportunitiesSummarize the Affordable Care Act and include a minimum of two slides that focus on the team\u2019s consensus or inability to reach a consensus.An Introduction and Conclusion are required. Format \u2013 Each slide is required to be 3-5 bullet points. Slides should not be in complete sentences. Each bullet point is required to be thoroughly discussed in the Speaker Notes. Please review the Sample PowerPoint in Announcements. Cite at least three scholarly sources.Click the Assignment Files tab to submit your team\u2019s presentation.ResourcesCenter for Writing ExcellenceReference and Citation GeneratorGrammar and Writing GuidesLearning Team ToolkitCopyright 2018 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.<\/p>\n
Walden University Study Plan Nursing Question
Assignment 2: Study PlanBased on your practice exam question results from Week 2, identify strengths and areas of opportun \u2026<\/p>\n
Walden University Study Plan Nursing Question
Assignment 2: Study PlanBased on your practice exam question results from Week 2, identify strengths and areas of opportunity and create a tailored study plan to use throughout this course to help you prepare for the national certification exam. This will serve as an action plan to help you track your goals, tasks, and progress. You will revisit and update your study plan in NRNP 6675, and you may continue to refine and use it until you take the exam.Photo Credit: [Jacob Ammentorp Lund]\/[iStock \/ Getty Images Plus]\/Getty ImagesTo PrepareReflect on your practice exam question results from Week 2. Identify content-area strengths and opportunities for improvement.Also reflect on your overall test taking. Was the length of time allotted comfortable, or did you run out of time? Did a particular question format prove difficult?The AssignmentBased on your practice test question results, and considering the national certification exam, summarize your strengths and opportunities for improvement. Note: Your grade for this Assignment will not be derived from your test results but from your self-reflection and study plan.Create a study plan for this quarter to prepare for the certification exam, including three or four SMART goals and the tasks you need to complete to accomplish each goal. Include a timetable for accomplishing them and a description of how you will measure your progress.Describe resources you would use to accomplish your goals and tasks, such as ways to participate in a study group or review course, mnemonics and other mental strategies, and print or online resources you could use to study.<\/p>\n
16 pages<\/p>\n
Template.scholarly Capstone Project Paper 1
This paper discusses how to create and implement a project whose objective is to prevent falls and promote health among ol \u2026<\/p>\n
Template.scholarly Capstone Project Paper 1
This paper discusses how to create and implement a project whose objective is to prevent falls and promote health among older people. The project \u2026<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
14 pages Deliverable 7 Social Media Plan If I were to establish a profitable company, I would form the Jerry\u2019s Caf\u00e9. The cafe would be the coffee alongside the \u2026 Deliverable 7 Social Media Plan If I were to establish a profitable company, I would form the Jerry\u2019s Caf\u00e9. The cafe would be the coffee … Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-14134","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-essaywr"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/academicwritersbay.com\/writings\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14134","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/academicwritersbay.com\/writings\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/academicwritersbay.com\/writings\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/academicwritersbay.com\/writings\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/academicwritersbay.com\/writings\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14134"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/academicwritersbay.com\/writings\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14134\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/academicwritersbay.com\/writings\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14134"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/academicwritersbay.com\/writings\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14134"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/academicwritersbay.com\/writings\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14134"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}