Assignment Solutions

ASSIGNMENT 1 – ESSAY Within the context of two theoretical ethical principles of equity and justice, overview the theory that of managed care and its life like implications for the health and wellbeing of other folk in non-public health care

—

by

A. Smith
in

ASSIGNMENT BRIEF

PROGRAMME TITLE

MSci in Successfully being and Social Care Administration, Sept2025.

MODULE CREDIT VALUE

20

MODULE TITLE

Moral Foundations (EF)

MODULE LEVEL

4

MODULE CODE

LSME407

ACADEMIC YEAR

2025-26

LEARNING OUTCOMES

On winning completion of this module the student will be ready to

  • Worth and talk about the thought of managed care and its life like implications.
  • Present the theoretical ideas that underpin a managed healthcare system.
  • Checklist and talk about the belief of ‘responsibility’ in the context of managed healthcare.
  • Present how a sure ethical native weather can be promoted as part of implementing an ethics programme in a healthcare organisation.

SUBMISSION DEADLINES

Project 1: Essay – 29/04/2026 4pm

Project 2: Reflective Essay – 27/05/2026 4pm

ISSUE DATE

16/03/2026

MODULE DESCRIPTION

The module considers the theoretical foundations of particular person and organisational ethics in a health and social care environment. The foundations that are developed form a framework that would possibly perhaps perhaps additionally be old to answer to straightforward day to day ethical challenges and eventualities. The just is for an ethically ‘conscious’ skill whereby principles would possibly perhaps perhaps additionally be applied flexibly and confidently when responding to complications. The final part of the module examines how a sure ethical native weather would possibly perhaps perhaps additionally be developed in a healthcare organisation including compliance and evaluate.

ASSESSMENT TASKS

There are TWO assignments for this module:

Project 1 – (Essay) 2000 words +/- 10%

Total Weighting: 50% Supposed Learning Outcomes: 1 and 2

Project 2 – (Reflective Essay as part of a studying log) 2000 words +/- 10% Total Weighting: 50% Supposed Learning Outcomes: 3 and 4

ASSIGNMENT 1 – ESSAY

Within the context of two theoretical ethical principles of equity and justice, overview the theory that of managed care and its life like implications for the health and wellbeing of other folk in non-public health care programs in the US and the NHS in the UK.

ASSIGNMENT 1 – INDICATIVE MARKING CRITERIA

[Total: 100 Marks]

Essay

A* 80%+

Excessive First

An very top reply will enjoy the following attributes:

  • An very top belief and discussion of the thought of managed care and its life like implication
    • An very top belief of the theoretical principles that underpin managed care with life like discussions round SDG-3 and 16.
    • Exceptionally smartly structured and smartly-presented arguments
    • Real use of English language
      • Referencing in precisely Harvard Fashion Intensive studying of major offer drawing honest inferences
      • Broad studying of secondary sources to be ready to substantiate or contradict the arguments given in the offer material
      • Exceptionally smartly-structured and smartly-presented document
      • Plump reference precisely in the Harvard vogue of referencing.

A 70 – 79%

First Class

All elements will enjoy been submitted, and the final requirements will be as smartly-known for the 80%+ marking band. On the varied hand, in one or two areas, the submission will be originate to minor criticism.

B 60 – 69 %

Greater 2nd

A very appropriate reply will enjoy the following attributes

  • A appropriate belief and discussion of the thought of managed care and its life like implication
  • A appropriate belief of the theoretical principles that underpin managed care
  • Establish the challenges and provide strategies for more than just a few solutions
  • Determined and logical constructing exhibiting the development of ideas and argument
    • Broad studying of secondary sources to be ready to substantiate or contradict the arguments given in the offer material
    • A smartly-articulated and detailed argument with sound common sense producing a generalized summary.
    • Plump reference precisely in the Harvard vogue of referencing with some minor errors.
    • A smartly-structured and coherent work written in honest English with some minor errors

C 50 – 59%

Lower 2nd

All elements will enjoy been submitted, and the final requirements will be as smartly-known for the 60-69% marking band. On the varied hand, there’ll be some gaps in records and diagnosis.

D 40 – 49%

Third Class

The reply in this band of marks will enjoy the following attributes:

  • A tiny depend on of the thought of managed care and its life like implication
  • A tiny belief of the theoretical principles that underpin managed care.
  • Primarily descriptive with tiny proof of deeper belief

  • Feeble constructing with some mistakes in grammar or sentence constructing.
    • Proof of appropriate but no longer in-depth studying of major offer. Ready to drawing related inferences
    • Small studying of secondary sources to be ready to substantiate or contradict the arguments given in the offer material
    • Lacks in articulating the key arguments to manufacture a generalized summary and recommendation.
    • Adequate facts visualization and academic document writing
    • The work will enjoy some noticeable errors in the English Language.
    • References and quotation of all the sources no longer integrated

F 30 – 39%

Fail

The reply in this band of marks will enjoy the following attributes:

  • The work displays an insufficient level of appropriate or conceptual belief of the field.
    • The work is nearly fully descriptive exhibiting exiguous or no proof of diagnosis and with unsubstantiated opinions and no utility of facts.
    • Very tiny studying comprehension of major offer
    • Very tiny proof of studying of secondary sources
    • Many mistakes in grammar or sentence constructing.
    • Underdeveloped academic vogue of document writing
    • The references checklist no longer whole and no longer in the Harvard referencing

F 0 – 29%

Discouraged Fail
  • Largely incorrect or inappropriate utility
  • No or exiguous proof of identification and records of the topic
  • Construction very feeble or lacking.
  • Many mistakes in grammar or sentence constructing
  • Citations and bibliography are wrong or lacking.
  • The work would possibly perhaps perhaps be incomplete or too brief.

ASSIGNMENT 2 – Reflective Essay

This assignment is developed from facts bought from your weekly studying logs, which displays on how the belief of responsibility is manifested on your managed health and social care environment and the arrangement to promote an ethical native weather in an organisation.

Job – Reflective summary

Reflect on an ethics programme that has been applied in response to ethical challenges surrounding the belief of responsibility on your health and social care environment, explaining the arrangement it’ll promote a actually top ethical native weather.[Total-100 marks]

ASSIGNMENT 2 – INDICATIVE MARKING CRITERIA

Reflective Essay

A* 80%+

Excessive First

An very top reply will enjoy the following attributes:

  • Exceptionally mammoth appropriate and conceptual belief of ‘responsibility’ in managedhealth and social care organisations and what constitutes an ethical native weather.
  • Unheard of evaluate and evaluate of the promotion of an ethical native weather in ethics programmes
  • Design foremost inferences and manufacture a vary of responses to tackle the organisation’s complications
  • Broad studying of major and secondary sources •
  • Exceptionally smartly-structured and smartly-presented document
  • Plump reference precisely in the Harvard vogue of referencing

A 70 – 79%

First Class

All elements will enjoy been submitted, and the final requirements will be as smartly-known for the 80%+ marking band. On the varied hand, in one or two areas, the submission will be originate to minor criticism.

B 60 – 69 %

Greater Secon d

The reply in this band of marks will enjoy the following attributes:

  • Good appropriate and conceptual belief of responsibility in managed health and social care organisations and what constitutes an ethical native weather.
  • A appropriate evaluate and evaluate of the promotion of ethical native weather in ethics 3

programmes within health and social care organisation.

  • Determined and logical constructing exhibiting the development of ideas and argument.
  • Establish the challenges and provide strategies for more than just a few solutions
  • Good evaluate, with a appropriate reflection
  • A smartly-structured and coherent work written in honest English.
  • A full checklist of references with minor errors/omissions.

C 50 – 59%

Lower Secon d

All elements will enjoy been submitted, and the final requirements will be as smartly-known for the 60-69% marking band. On the varied hand, there’ll be some gaps in records and diagnosis.

D 40 – 49%

The reply in this band of marks will enjoy the following attributes:

  • General records and conceptual belief of responsibility in managed health and social care organisations and what constitutes an ethical native weather.
  • General records and evaluate of the promotion of ethical native weather in ethics programmes.
  • Primarily descriptive work with disorganised or fragmented diagnosis.
  • Lack of wider research
  • Small evaluate, with minimum or no reflection
  • Only ready to develop long-established strategies no longer demonstrating an in-depth belief
  • The work will enjoy some noticeable errors in the English Language.
    • References and quotation of all the sources no longer integrated

F 30 – 39%

Fail

The reply in this band of marks will enjoy the following attributes:

  • The work displays an insufficient level of appropriate or conceptual belief of responsibility in managed health and social care organisations and what constitutes an ethical native weather.
  • Very feeble records and evaluate of the promotion of ethical native weather in ethics programmes.
  • The work is nearly fully descriptive exhibiting exiguous or no proof of diagnosis and with unsubstantiated opinions.
  • Lack of wider research
  • Construction very feeble or lacking
  • Many mistakes in grammar or sentence constructing.

F 0 – 29%

Discouraged Fail

The reply in this band of marks will enjoy the following attributes:

  • Largely incorrect or inappropriate material with exiguous or no proof of belief of the topic
  • Construction very feeble or lacking.
  • There are many mistakes in grammar or sentence constructing.
  • Citations and bibliography are wrong or lacking.
  • The work would possibly perhaps perhaps be incomplete or too brief

COMPLETING THE TASKS

In repeat to whole the Assignments 1 and a pair of, you will ought to research varied facts sources such as textbooks, journals, articles and the web. You are additionally required to invent abilities in diagnosis and synthesis of facts. Prognosis requires you to seriously gaze varied sides of a topic topic and identify notable points. Synthesis requires you to summarise the records that you would be in a position to enjoy gotten analysed clearly and coherently.

Please Present: Create use of facts on assignment preparation and expose verb utilization on your VLE. Please talk about with the Module Manual for more facts on;

  • Core and supplementary studying materials and life like websites
  • Guidance on how to original and publish your work
  • Penalties for exceeding or no longer assembly the instant observe
  • Penalties for unhurried submission
  • Referencing your work including the use of AI
  • Academic Malpractice and penalties
  • Re-sit down assignment
  • Request for extension of assignment cut-off dates and
  • Mitigation Circumstance claims with University of Chichester

QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPER – NO ChatGPT.NO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER

Best Custom Essay Writing Services

Looking for unparalleled custom paper writing services? Our team of experienced professionals at AcademicWritersBay.com is here to provide you with top-notch assistance that caters to your unique needs.

We understand the importance of producing original, high-quality papers that reflect your personal voice and meet the rigorous standards of academia. That’s why we assure you that our work is completely plagiarism-free—we craft bespoke solutions tailored exclusively for you.

Why Choose AcademicWritersBay.com?

  • Our papers are 100% original, custom-written from scratch.
  • We’re here to support you around the clock, any day of the year.
  • You’ll find our prices competitive and reasonable.
  • We handle papers across all subjects, regardless of urgency or difficulty.
  • Need a paper urgently? We can deliver within 6 hours!
  • Relax with our on-time delivery commitment.
  • We offer money-back and privacy guarantees to ensure your satisfaction and confidentiality.
  • Benefit from unlimited amendments upon request to get the paper you envisioned.
  • We pledge our dedication to meeting your expectations and achieving the grade you deserve.

Our Process: Getting started with us is as simple as can be. Here’s how to do it:

  • Click on the “Place Your Order” tab at the top or the “Order Now” button at the bottom. You’ll be directed to our order form.
  • Provide the specifics of your paper in the “PAPER DETAILS” section.
  • Select your academic level, the deadline, and the required number of pages.
  • Click on “CREATE ACCOUNT & SIGN IN” to provide your registration details, then “PROCEED TO CHECKOUT.”
  • Follow the simple payment instructions and soon, our writers will be hard at work on your paper.

AcademicWritersBay.com is dedicated to expediting the writing process without compromising on quality. Our roster of writers boasts individuals with advanced degrees—Masters and PhDs—in a myriad of disciplines, ensuring that no matter the complexity or field of your assignment, we have the expertise to tackle it with finesse. Our quick turnover doesn’t mean rushed work; it means efficiency and priority handling, ensuring your deadlines are met with the excellence your academics demand.

ORDER NOW and experience the difference with AcademicWritersBay.com, where excellence meets timely delivery.

NO PLAGIARISM