Project: Argument Blueprint Mapping By the cease of this assignment, you will hang a comprehensive argument draw that every information your argument for the Week 9 debate and integrates your research from last week

This criterion is linked to a Studying OutcomeIntroduction – Background & Significance (10 components)

10 to >9.0 ptsExcellentAffords a thorough, sure background (on the very least 4 sentences) and detailed rationalization of importance (on the very least 3 sentences). Fully contextualizes the difficulty and prepares the reader for the argument.

9 to >7.0 ptsProficientBackground and importance integrated and largely sure; is also lacking 1–2 required sentences total (e.g., 5–6 total sentences as another of 7). Would possibly doubtless well per chance hang minor gaps in detail.

7 to >5.0 ptsSatisfactoryBackground or importance novel nonetheless imprecise, incomplete, or tremendously below length (4–5 total sentences).

5 to >3.0 ptsDevelopingBackground and/or importance minimal, unclear, or transient (3 or fewer total sentences).

3 to >0 ptsMissingNo background or importance provided.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Studying OutcomePosition Assertion (10 components)

10 to >9.0 ptsExcellentComplete, concise, and correctly-formed Even though+Dispute+Attributable to assertion; clearly displays research; makes exercise of no “I”; at as soon as states stance.

9 to >7.0 ptsProficientDivulge assertion largely factual, minor clarity or structure components; displays research.

7 to >5.0 ptsSatisfactoryAssertion novel nonetheless imprecise, lacking piece of the components, or now now not fully grounded in research.

5 to >3.0 ptsDevelopingAssertion unclear, incomplete, or does now now not be conscious components.

3 to >0 ptsMissingNo arena assertion provided.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Studying OutcomeTwo Supporting Arguments – Evidence & Reasoning (20 components)

20 to >18.0 ptsExcellentEntails two fully developed arguments. Each and each argument has 1 sentence for the predominant point and on the very least 3 sentences of evidence (minimum 4 total per argument). Reasoning is obvious, logical, and correctly-supported by research.

18 to >15.0 ptsProficientTwo arguments novel, nonetheless one might possibly well also drop short of sentence minimum (e.g., 2 sentences of evidence). Reasoning largely sure; minor depth components.

15 to >11.0 ptsSatisfactoryOne or every arguments underdeveloped or lacking evidence (e.g., handiest 1–2 total sentences per argument).

11 to >6.0 ptsDevelopingArguments minimal or unclear; most sections fail to fulfill sentence necessities.

6 to >0 ptsMissingNo total arguments or evidence provided

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Studying OutcomeObjections and Refutation (15 components)

15 to >14.0 ptsExcellentAddresses objections in full with grand reasoning and evidence. Entails on the very least 3 sentences for the objection, 3 sentences of supporting evidence, and 3 sentences of refutation (9 total). Logical and persuasive refutation connects back to important argument.

14 to >11.0 ptsProficientObjection, evidence, and refutation novel nonetheless one piece might possibly well also drop moderately short (e.g., 2 sentences as another of three in a single part). Largely sure and supported.

11 to >8.0 ptsSatisfactoryAll three sections integrated nonetheless 2 or extra drop short of sentence minimums or reasoning is imprecise.

8 to >4.0 ptsDevelopingObjection or refutation minimal or unclear; fails to fulfill most sentence expectations.

4 to >0 ptsMissingNo objection or refutation integrated.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Studying OutcomeConclusion – Abstract, Compromise/Solution, and Name to Action (10 components)

10 to >9.0 ptsExcellentConclusion entails all three required substances: abstract (on the very least 3 sentences), compromise/reply (on the very least 2 sentences), and talk to to coast (on the very least 2 sentences). Persuasive and logically linked to the argument.

9 to >7.0 ptsProficientAll aspects integrated nonetheless one arena is also moderately below length (e.g., 1 sentence short) or lacks minor detail.

7 to >5.0 ptsSatisfactoryConclusion novel nonetheless lacking one in every of the three aspects or below length in extra than one sections.

5 to >3.0 ptsDevelopingConclusion minimal or unclear; fails to fulfill sentence expectations for most aspects.

3 to >0 ptsMissingNo conclusion provided.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Studying OutcomeUse of Research & Completeness (10 components)

10 to >9.0 ptsExcellentIntegrates research from Findings Log totally one day of sections; all sections total, exhibiting a comprehensive blueprint.

9 to >7.0 ptsProficientResearch integrated in most sections; most sections total.

7 to >5.0 ptsSatisfactorySome exercise of research; several sections incomplete or partly developed.

5 to >3.0 ptsDevelopingMinimal evidence of research; most sections incomplete.

3 to >0 ptsMissingNo evidence of research; blueprint incomplete.

10 pts