APPLYING EPIDEMIOLOGY TO PROGRAM DESIGN FOR CHRONIC DISEASE
Roughly 28.5 million Individuals have been aloof uninsured as of 2017, and 133 million Individuals […] endure from no less than one power situation.
—Nash et al. (2021, p. 5)
As you perceive, promoting definite social alternate is a ingredient of the Walden mission. To be an efficient agent for social alternate, nurses need so that you can logically and severely analyze inhabitants properly being points the use of epidemiologic concepts, after which translate this files into evidence-based totally note to toughen healthcare outcomes. This exercise will present you with the money for you such an experience at the inhabitants stage. It is miles a thrilling time to be working in the discipline of inhabitants properly being with the total current, dynamic, and modern applied sciences and suggestions to support sufferers and populations become more an expert about their properly being.
This week’s Discovering out Assets current reasonably plenty of properly being complications that lead to a need for ongoing care. Your Assignment is to make a preference a power illness of legitimate importance to you, after which possess an intervention program to toughen the properly being of populations tormented by it.
Reference:
Nash, D. B., Skoufalos, A., Fabius, R. J., & Oglesby, W. H. (2021). Inhabitants properly being: Developing a custom of wellness (3rd ed). Jones & Bartlett Discovering out.
RESOURCES
Be definite to study the Discovering out Assets forward of ending this exercise.
Click the weekly sources hyperlink to build up admission to the sources.
WEEKLY RESOURCES
TO PREPARE:
- Review the Power Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (NCCDPHP) online page from the Facilities for Disease Management and Prevention (CDC).
- Decide even handed one of the identified power ailments of national significance that impacts a inhabitants of ardour to you.
- Snatch into memoir a properly being you can fancy to toughen in this inhabitants connected to the chosen power illness.
- Construct a program proposal to toughen this properly being for this inhabitants the use of the project guidelines beneath. Decide even handed one of the program devices in Curley, Chapter 8, to guide your planning.
- Review the SMART objective sources for a review of write dreams to your program.
- Exercise the Walden APA paper template, along side appropriate APA 7 headings, to possess this Assignment.
THE ASSIGNMENT
In a 7- to 10-page proposal (no longer along side title page and references), tackle the next:
- Briefly name your selected power properly being peril and inhabitants.
- Picture the geographic put and crucial traits of this inhabitants.
- Picture the patterns of the illness to your selected inhabitants the use of the epidemiologic traits of individual, predicament, and time.
- Name one properly being you can fancy to toughen for the inhabitants.
- Briefly summarize current evidence that helps the importance of bettering this properly being .
- Briefly characterize the evidence-based totally program you’re creating, and why this near will supreme match the wants of your inhabitants.
- Point to what files you can have to accumulate, and how which you can make and analyze it. That you just too can merely resolve to web major files or use secondary files. Interpret your preference.
- Using the “SMART” map, write short- and long-term dreams for the program.
- Name the stakeholders who would possibly per chance merely aloof be desirous about program planning.
- Name which program planning mannequin (look Curley, Chapter 7) you selected to your program. Interpret your preference of mannequin. In conserving with the mannequin, notify how you can thought, implement, and review the program.
- Point to any connected cultural or ethical concerns connected to your program possess.
- Point to how you can fund the program.
- Picture suggestions that would be appropriate for marketing the program.
BY DAY 7 OF WEEK 10
Put up your Assignment.
SUBMISSION INFORMATION
Earlier than submitting your final project, which you can per chance take a look at your draft for authenticity. To verify your draft, accumulate admission to the Turnitin Drafts from the Initiate Here put.
- To put up your performed project, assign your Assignment as WK10Assgn_LastName_Firstinitial
- Then, click on Initiate Assignment near the cease of the page.
- Subsequent, click on Upload File and decide Put up Assignment for review.
Rubric
NURS_8310_Week10_Assignment_Rubric
|
NURS_8310_Week10_Assignment_Rubric |
||
|
Criteria |
Rankings |
Pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Discovering out OutcomeIn a 7- to 10-page proposal (no longer along side title page and references), tackle the next: Briefly name your selected power properly being peril and inhabitants. |
20 to >17.0 ptsExcellentThe response precisely and concisely identifies the chosen power properly being peril and inhabitants. 17 to >15.0 ptsGoodThe response precisely identifies the chosen power properly being peril and inhabitants. 15 to >12.0 ptsFairThe response considerably inaccurately or vaguely identifies the chosen power properly being peril and inhabitants. 12 to >0 ptsPoorThe response inaccurately and vaguely identifies the chosen power properly being peril and inhabitants, or it is lacking. |
20 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Discovering out OutcomePicture the geographic put and crucial traits of this inhabitants. |
20 to >17.0 ptsExcellentThe response precisely and concisely describes the geographic put and crucial traits of the inhabitants. 17 to >15.0 ptsGoodThe response precisely describes the geographic put and crucial traits of the inhabitants. 15 to >12.0 ptsFairThe response considerably inaccurately or vaguely describes the geographic put and crucial traits of the inhabitants. 12 to >0 ptsPoorThe response inaccurately and vaguely describes the geographic put and crucial traits of the inhabitants, or it is lacking. |
20 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Discovering out OutcomePicture the patterns of the illness to your selected inhabitants the use of the epidemiologic traits of individual, predicament, and time. |
25 to >22.0 ptsExcellentAn loyal and detailed description of the patterns of the illness in the chosen inhabitants the use of the epidemiologic traits of individual, predicament, and time is provided. 22 to >19.0 ptsGoodAn loyal description of the patterns of the illness in the chosen inhabitants the use of the epidemiologic traits of individual, predicament, and time is provided. 19 to >17.0 ptsFairA considerably wrong or imprecise description of the patterns of the illness in the chosen inhabitants the use of the epidemiologic traits of individual, predicament, and time is provided. 17 to >0 ptsPoorAn wrong and imprecise, or incomplete description of the patterns of the illness in the chosen inhabitants the use of the epidemiologic traits of individual, predicament, and time is provided, or it is lacking. |
25 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Discovering out OutcomeName one properly being you would fancy to toughen for the inhabitants. |
20 to >17.0 ptsExcellentThe response precisely and concisely identifies one properly being for enchancment in the inhabitants. 17 to >15.0 ptsGoodThe response precisely identifies one properly being for enchancment in the inhabitants. 15 to >12.0 ptsFairThe response considerably inaccurately or vaguely identifies one properly being for enchancment in the inhabitants. 12 to >0 ptsPoorThe response inaccurately and vaguely identifies one properly being for enchancment in the inhabitants, or it is lacking. |
20 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Discovering out OutcomeBriefly summarize current evidence that helps the importance of bettering this properly being . |
25 to >22.0 ptsExcellentA determined, concise, and splendid abstract of current evidence that helps the importance of bettering the properly being is provided. 22 to >19.0 ptsGoodAn loyal abstract of current evidence that helps the importance of bettering the properly being is provided. 19 to >17.0 ptsFairA considerably wrong or imprecise abstract of current evidence that helps the importance of bettering the properly being is provided. 17 to >0 ptsPoorAn wrong and imprecise, or incomplete abstract of current evidence that helps the importance of bettering the properly being is provided, or it is lacking. |
25 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Discovering out OutcomeBriefly characterize the evidence-based totally program you’re creating, and why this near will supreme match the wants of your inhabitants. |
20 to >17.0 ptsExcellentThe response precisely and concisely the evidence-based totally program you’re creating, and why this near will supreme match the wants of your inhabitants. 17 to >15.0 ptsGoodThe response precisely describes the evidence-based totally program you’re creating, and why this near will supreme match the wants of your inhabitants. 15 to >12.0 ptsFairThe response considerably inaccurately or vaguely describes the evidence-based totally program you’re creating, and why this near will supreme match the wants of your inhabitants. 12 to >0 ptsPoorThe response inaccurately and vaguely describes the evidence-based totally program you’re creating, and why this near will supreme match the wants of your inhabitants. |
20 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Discovering out OutcomePoint to what files you can have to accumulate, and how which you can make and analyze it. That you just too can merely resolve to web major files or use secondary files. Interpret your preference. |
25 to >22.0 ptsExcellentAn loyal and detailed explanation of serious files for the program and how it would possibly per chance maybe be received and analyzed is provided. A magnificent justification for decisions is provided. 22 to >19.0 ptsGoodAn loyal explanation of serious files for the program and how it would possibly per chance maybe be received and analyzed is provided. Acceptable justification for decisions is provided. 19 to >17.0 ptsFairA considerably wrong or imprecise explanation of serious files for the program and how it would possibly per chance maybe be received and analyzed is provided. Justification for decisions is provided but can be considerably imprecise or wrong. 17 to >0 ptsPoorAn wrong and imprecise, or incomplete explanation of serious files for the program and how it would possibly per chance maybe be received and analyzed is provided, or it is lacking. Justification for decisions is insufficient or lacking. |
25 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Discovering out OutcomeUsing the “SMART” map, write transient and long-term dreams for the program. |
25 to >22.0 ptsExcellentCertain and measurable transient and long-term SMART targets for the program are provided. 22 to >19.0 ptsGoodMeasurable transient and long-term SMART targets for the program are provided. 19 to >17.0 ptsFairTemporary and long-term targets for the program are provided but can be considerably imprecise or no longer meet all SMART criteria. 17 to >0 ptsPoorTemporary and long-term targets for the program are imprecise or assemble no longer meet SMART criteria or are lacking. |
25 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Discovering out OutcomeName the stakeholders that would possibly per chance merely aloof be desirous about program planning. |
20 to >17.0 ptsExcellentThe response precisely and concisely identifies the stakeholders that must be desirous about program planning. 17 to >15.0 ptsGoodThe response precisely identifies the stakeholders that must be desirous about program planning. 15 to >12.0 ptsFairThe response considerably inaccurately or vaguely identifies the stakeholders that must be desirous about program planning. 12 to >0 ptsPoorThe response inaccurately and vaguely identifies the stakeholders that must be desirous about program planning or is lacking. |
20 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Discovering out OutcomeName which program planning mannequin you selected to your program. Interpret your preference of mannequin. Basically based totally on the mannequin, notify how you can thought, implement, and review the program. |
40 to >35.0 ptsExcellentThe response clearly and concisely identifies the program planning mannequin and affords an impressive justification for its selection…. An loyal and detailed explanation of program planning, implementation, and review, consistent with the chosen mannequin, is provided. Response shows powerful understanding and application of program planning concepts and suggestions. 35 to >31.0 ptsGoodThe response clearly identifies the program planning mannequin and affords a suitable justification for its selection…. An loyal and appropriate explanation of program planning, implementation, and review, consistent with the chosen mannequin, is provided. 31 to >27.0 ptsFairThe response considerably inaccurately or vaguely identifies a program planning mannequin and justifies the preference…. A considerably imprecise or wrong explanation of program planning, implementation, and review, consistent with the chosen mannequin, is provided. 27 to >0 ptsPoorThe response inaccurately or vaguely identifies a program planning mannequin, or it is lacking. Justification for selection is used or lacking…. A imprecise or wrong explanation of program planning, implementation, and review is provided, or it is lacking. |
40 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Discovering out OutcomePoint to any connected cultural or ethical concerns connected to your program possess. |
25 to >22.0 ptsExcellentAn loyal and detailed explanation of connected cultural or ethical concerns connected to the program possess is provided. 22 to >19.0 ptsGoodAn loyal explanation of connected cultural or ethical concerns connected to the program possess is provided. 19 to >17.0 ptsFairA considerably wrong or imprecise explanation of connected cultural or ethical concerns connected to the program possess is provided. 17 to >0 ptsPoorAn wrong and imprecise, or incomplete explanation of connected cultural or ethical concerns connected to the program possess is provided, or it is lacking. |
25 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Discovering out OutcomePoint to how you can fund the program. |
10 to >8.0 ptsExcellentAn loyal and detailed explanation of how the program would be funded is provided. 8 to >7.0 ptsGoodAn loyal explanation of how the program would be funded is provided. 7 to >6.0 ptsFairA considerably wrong or imprecise explanation of how the program would be funded is provided. 6 to >0 ptsPoorAn wrong and imprecise, or incomplete explanation of how the program would be funded is provided, or it is lacking. |
10 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Discovering out OutcomePicture suggestions that would be appropriate for marketing the program. |
10 to >8.0 ptsExcellentAn loyal and detailed description of suggestions that would be appropriate for marketing the program is provided. 8 to >7.0 ptsGoodAn loyal description of suggestions that would be appropriate for marketing the program is provided. 7 to >6.0 ptsFairA considerably wrong or imprecise description of suggestions that would be appropriate for marketing the program is provided. 6 to >0 ptsPoorAn wrong and imprecise, or incomplete description of suggestions that would be appropriate for marketing the program is provided, or it is lacking. |
10 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Discovering out OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Boost and Group: Paragraphs originate determined aspects that red meat up properly-developed concepts, drift logically, and point to continuity of concepts. Sentences are reasonably centered—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A determined and complete cause say and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria. |
5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentParagraphs and sentences note writing standards for drift, continuity, and clarity…. A determined and complete cause say, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria. 4 to >3.5 ptsGoodParagraphs and sentences note writing standards for drift, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time…. Reason, introduction, and conclusion of the project is mentioned, yet is short and no longer descriptive. 3.5 to >3.0 ptsFairParagraphs and sentences note writing standards for drift, continuity, and clarity 60%–seventy nine% of the time…. Reason, introduction, and conclusion of the project is imprecise or off topic. 3 to >0 ptsPoorParagraphs and sentences note writing standards for drift, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.... No cause say, introduction, or conclusion modified into provided. |
5 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Discovering out OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—English writing standards: Appropriate grammar, mechanics, and loyal punctuation |
5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentUses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation and not utilizing a errors. 4 to >3.5 ptsGoodComprises about a (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 3.5 to >3.0 ptsFairComprises loads of (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 3 to >0 ptsPoorComprises many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. |
5 pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Discovering out OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting: The paper follows correct APA structure for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. |
5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentUses correct APA structure and not utilizing a errors. 4 to >3.5 ptsGoodComprises about a (1 or 2) APA structure errors. 3.5 to >3.0 ptsFairComprises loads of (3 or 4) APA structure errors. 3 to >0 ptsPoorComprises many (≥ 5) APA structure errors. |
5 pts |
Total Facets: 300
- WE OFFER THE BEST CUSTOM PAPER WRITING SERVICES. WE HAVE DONE THIS QUESTION BEFORE, WE CAN ALSO DO IT FOR YOU.
- Assignment status: Already Solved By Our Experts
- (USA, AUS, UK & CA PhD. Writers)
- CLICK HERE TO GET A PROFESSIONAL WRITER TO WORK ON THIS PAPER AND OTHER SIMILAR PAPERS, GET A NON PLAGIARIZED PAPER FROM OUR EXPERTS
QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPER – NO ChatGPT.NO PLAGIARISM – CUSTOM PAPER
Looking for unparalleled custom paper writing services? Our team of experienced professionals at AcademicWritersBay.com is here to provide you with top-notch assistance that caters to your unique needs.
We understand the importance of producing original, high-quality papers that reflect your personal voice and meet the rigorous standards of academia. That’s why we assure you that our work is completely plagiarism-free—we craft bespoke solutions tailored exclusively for you.
Why Choose AcademicWritersBay.com?
- Our papers are 100% original, custom-written from scratch.
- We’re here to support you around the clock, any day of the year.
- You’ll find our prices competitive and reasonable.
- We handle papers across all subjects, regardless of urgency or difficulty.
- Need a paper urgently? We can deliver within 6 hours!
- Relax with our on-time delivery commitment.
- We offer money-back and privacy guarantees to ensure your satisfaction and confidentiality.
- Benefit from unlimited amendments upon request to get the paper you envisioned.
- We pledge our dedication to meeting your expectations and achieving the grade you deserve.
Our Process: Getting started with us is as simple as can be. Here’s how to do it:
- Click on the “Place Your Order” tab at the top or the “Order Now” button at the bottom. You’ll be directed to our order form.
- Provide the specifics of your paper in the “PAPER DETAILS” section.
- Select your academic level, the deadline, and the required number of pages.
- Click on “CREATE ACCOUNT & SIGN IN” to provide your registration details, then “PROCEED TO CHECKOUT.”
- Follow the simple payment instructions and soon, our writers will be hard at work on your paper.
AcademicWritersBay.com is dedicated to expediting the writing process without compromising on quality. Our roster of writers boasts individuals with advanced degrees—Masters and PhDs—in a myriad of disciplines, ensuring that no matter the complexity or field of your assignment, we have the expertise to tackle it with finesse. Our quick turnover doesn’t mean rushed work; it means efficiency and priority handling, ensuring your deadlines are met with the excellence your academics demand.
